Clinton body count redux in one "info-graphic".

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Bloody hell, I forgot about her.

Guess I didn't advance the round.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

I think mainstream news doesn't touch many truthful and even proven stories of great public interest, so that's not the way I would approach your argument.

I don't think the info-graphic purports to be something it's not, really. It's doesn't claim that all those on the list were murdered by the Clintons....it really doesn't.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

You are not understanding that Fox News would jump at this opportunity as they always had with the Clintons in the past.

Anyway GASP! Take a look at this article about big bad boy Trump!
www.snopes.com...

Now what?

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You are not understanding that Fox News would jump at this opportunity as they always had with the Clintons in the past.

No, I don't believe that.

I think both parties are in collusion and the mainstream media covers for them. That's why I don't really bother with any mainstream news.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You are not understanding that Fox News would jump at this opportunity as they always had with the Clintons in the past.

No, I don't believe that.

I think both parties are in collusion and the mainstream media covers for them. That's why I don't really bother with any mainstream news.

I am sure you're right. I believe that too. That's why sometimes I read BBC.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

I read international news sites a lot, too, BBC included. It's becoming scary how the same headlines traverse all major news sources now, though.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You are not understanding that Fox News would jump at this opportunity as they always had with the Clintons in the past.

Anyway GASP! Take a look at this article about big bad boy Trump!
www.snopes.com...

Now what?

I guess where I am disagreeing with you is that you think that a few democrats saying Snopes is bias toward republicans proves they can't be biased against democrats,

or in this case one story debunking a Trump accusations proves they can't be biased agianst him.

I think this is not true.

Almost every outlet ever has reported some good things or defended some parts of aall political parties. So in that world, you would claim there is no bias at all in media.

Heck, I myself am biased to libertarian and right wing leading views, yet have defended liberals many times. Does that mean I am not bias toards the views I stated? Absolutely not.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You are not understanding that Fox News would jump at this opportunity as they always had with the Clintons in the past.

Anyway GASP! Take a look at this article about big bad boy Trump!
www.snopes.com...

Now what?

Now what? We laugh at your use of the pervert and the hooker in their basement 'fact checking'.

a reply to: Grambler

I guess my point is that since some Democrats and Republicans get upset over certain articles that don't support their assertions shows that Snopes do not care for either side. I am sure some biases and falsehoods creep through (there are different writers I am assuming?).
Let's just agree to disagree. Now what I want is evidence for this "info-graphic".

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You are not understanding that Fox News would jump at this opportunity as they always had with the Clintons in the past.

Anyway GASP! Take a look at this article about big bad boy Trump!
www.snopes.com...

Now what?

Now what? We laugh at your use of the pervert and the hooker in their basement 'fact checking'.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: GuidedKill
I'm sure the usual cast of characters will be along any second to say. What Evidence?? How do you know?/

Sorry to rain on your parade.
www.snopes.com...

Wow that snopes article makes it look even more obvious there is a cover-up.

Snopes says they should not have to tell people not to believe it but they will. 1 or 2 people drop dead that are going to testify against you in a lifetime raises a eyebrow for sure. This is just insane. There can't be a probability high enough for this.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
...make sure they were actually dead. Never having been a hitman I can't state that definitively, but I feel like it's a pretty rational thing for a hitman to do.

This is in fact our standing modus operandi.

a reply to: Shamrock6

If you are not saying Rich was killed in a robbery gone wrong... what exactly are you claiming?

Please source your material.

I did not ask you to defend anything, I stated what information I am going off of.

The only thing that does add up when it comes to the meme is that is was not the next day that he was called to testify, it was a matter of days.

On topic of the meme that I shared and for the fourth time what is your take on Lucas and Thorn?

Follow up question have you discounted all of the deaths around the Clintons that are found in the infamous Clinton Body Count?

a reply to: elementalgrove

Robbery gone wrong:

It is becoming somewhat evident that Seth Rich was passing info towards WikiLeaks. Since he was just a DNC staffer and not a high ranking officer. So the info wasn't exactly his so it would be theft which is a synonym of robbery. And since this info painted both the DNC and to a degree Hillary in a bad light, it would be wrong for a DNC staffer to do such unauthorized use of information. And of course Seth Rich was murdered.

So, Seth Rich (murdered during a robbery) gone wrong. Is true, from a certain point of view...

This is wrong . He was heading home from a bar. It happened very close to his doorstep.

There is so much False info out there.

Can not believe the sources quoted here.

As a libertarian, I'm just sitting back , eating my popcorn watching the world burn down waiting to reap the benefits.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: gladtobehere

Link me to a Fox News article about Clinton's alleged body count.
I'll wait.

Fox News has more integrity than the liberal MSM. They don't fly off the handle reporting and repeating rumors, like ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/NYT/WAPO and liberal outlets.

a reply to: gladtobehere

What about the African Americans that died when the Clintons screwed them over:

The establishment is getting scared and desperate now that we are getting this close to dismantling them. The DNC is set back 30+ years for their crimes. The word on the street even among the leftie/ normie population is that all news coming out of the mainstream is either completely fake paid shilling, or at the very least is totally jumping the gun. RIP deepstate #DrainTheSwamp


Mainstream press right now:

damn he killed hookers. you cannot socialize with these people, politichans, prezs, etc. at any point they can flip and kill you for no reason other than a whim.

i feel bad for the hookers, she was just doing her job.