Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador

originally posted by: Kashai
Sure, lets pretend those weapons cannot be fired any second based upon one opinion.

And yet here we all are hob nobbing on the internet missile free. Feel free to hide under your table though. I'll message you in a couple years when the coast is clear.

so the information was earned through an intelligence "sharing" system and people are upset that he might have shared this information with a major power? this is how things get done if u want to build bridges and defeat a common enemy. we did it during WW2 like crazy aswell with our allies and supposed allies. we share info with nato to this day. i guess it would be upsetting if u want to keep the old rivalries alive and well for generations to come but at some point people need to be willing to build bridges and end these stupid rivalries between nations that always lead to war. we can do much more good being friends with these countries rather then threatening them with mutual annihilation and keeping the populace in fear. isnt anyone else sick of the constant fear mongering?

a reply to: Rosinitiate

What was the last time you spoke to someone on the internet or otherwise from the Russian Republic?

a reply to: TheScale





I mean all one can do to prove this to themselves is to travel to Syria.

Headline may as well say; President declassifies information to use in negotiations with Russia. Cause he can.

So why exactly would a standing President of the United States give a country who we actually have ICBM's pointed at. "Highly Classified Information"?

Is it because Russia and the US share a space station?

originally posted by: Kashai
So why exactly would a standing President of the United States give a country who we actually have ICBM's pointed at. "Highly Classified Information"?

Is it because Russia and the US share a space station?

like i said to mend bridges and open up a dialogue. would u rather us stay enemies keeping that finger on top of the button that will doom mankind? have u talked to any actual russians that lived in the soviet union? i regularly work with one and the russian people are not our enemies. they are far more american then many americans today. they understand what its like to be oppressed and they pluck the pearl from the oyster they have found in america with gratefulness. like i said, why keep up with the fear mongering? where has that gotten us over the past 70 years with russia?

a reply to: Xeven

a reply to: TheScale



Actually yes I spoke to a Russian PHD who had a lot to do with Russian Nuclear Submarines as well as Nuclear Technology in general.

in respect to our conversation you have no idea what you are talking about.

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: TheScale



Actually yes I spoke to a Russian PHD who had a lot to do with Russian Nuclear Submarines as well as Nuclear Technology in general.

in respect to our conversation you have no idea what you are talking about.

then prove it rather then posting videos if u know so much. fyi i have family members who were in the pentagon, a navigator on us submarines who was on the committee that created our strategic planes for the navy in the pacific. which btw doesnt much matter, its something to consider but living in the past and not evolving your position only leaves u stuck in the same spot never moving forward. by extending an olive branch, your taking the first step. if they break it and stomp it underfoot then you know exactly where you stand. evolve and adapt to the current times or u will be dust in the wind of time.

a reply to: TheScale

In the Soviet system, environmentally threatening incidents such as the bursting of an oil pipeline received little or no public notice, and remedial actions were slow or nonexistent. Government officials felt that natural resources were abundant enough to afford waste, that the land could easily absorb any level of pollution, and that stringent control measures were an unjustifiable hindrance to economic advancement. In the 1990s, after decades of such practices, the government categorized about 40 percent of Russia's territory (an area about three-quarters as large as the United States) as under high or moderately high ecological stress. Excluding areas of radiation contamination, fifty-six areas have been identified as environmentally degraded regions, ranging from full-fledged ecological disaster areas to moderately polluted areas.

countrystudies.us...

Just to add...

Abortion in Russia is legal as an elective procedure up to the 12th week of pregnancy, and in special circumstances at later stages.[1] In 1920, Russian Soviet Republic became the first country in the world to allow abortion in all circumstances, but over the course of the 20th century, the legality of abortion changed more than once, with a ban being enacted again from 1936 to 1955. Russia had the highest number of abortions per woman of child-bearing age in the world according to UN data as of 2010.[2] In terms of the total number, in 2009 China reported that it had over 13 million abortions,[3] out of a population of 1.3 billion, compared to the 1.2 million abortions in Russia,[4] out of a population of 143 million people.

en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: TheScale

In the Soviet system, environmentally threatening incidents such as the bursting of an oil pipeline received little or no public notice, and remedial actions were slow or nonexistent. Government officials felt that natural resources were abundant enough to afford waste, that the land could easily absorb any level of pollution, and that stringent control measures were an unjustifiable hindrance to economic advancement. In the 1990s, after decades of such practices, the government categorized about 40 percent of Russia's territory (an area about three-quarters as large as the United States) as under high or moderately high ecological stress. Excluding areas of radiation contamination, fifty-six areas have been identified as environmentally degraded regions, ranging from full-fledged ecological disaster areas to moderately polluted areas.

countrystudies.us...

Just to add...

Abortion in Russia is legal as an elective procedingup to the 12th week of pregnancy, and in special circumstances at later stages.[1] In 1920, Russian Soviet Republic became the first country in the world to allow abortion in all circumstances, but over the course of the 20th century, the legality of abortion changed more than once, with a ban being enacted again from 1936 to 1955. Russia had the highest number of abortions per woman of child-bearing age in the world according to UN data as of 2010.[2] In terms of the total number, in 2009 China reported that it had over 13 million abortions,[3] out of a population of 1.3 billion, compared to the 1.2 million abortions in Russia,[4] out of a population of 143 million people.

en.wikipedia.org...

and wtf does that have to do with this conversation. u think proceeding down the same path of aggression towards each other will save lives? millions upon millions will be lost. by opening up a peaceful dialogue and working towards furthering a friendly stance towards each other can save millions of lives. so basically what you want is for the world to burn from what i gather?

a reply to: TheScale


The British tried to appease Adolf Hitler and that did not work out every well did it?


Why exactly do you think there were 1.2 million abortions in a population of 143 million?

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: TheScale


The British tried to appease Adolf Hitler and that did not work out every well did it?


Why exactly do you think there were 1.2 million abortions in a population of 143 million?

actually it worked out great for them. they held their position and werent overrun giving them the time needed for their allies to build up the necessary equipment and man power for the invasion on d-day. it saved their country along with saving lives. besides thats not relevant to this conversation either. somehow u think sharing intelligence on current affairs has a correlation with abortion rates so im going to just have to say your a bit out there if u think continuing down the same path of aggression will somehow prevent abortions.

a reply to: TheScale


What is the extent of rape in the Russian Republic compared to that of China?

What about the US"

What does that say about day to day life in comparison to "In 2013, 664,435 legal induced abortions were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. The abortion rate for 2013 was 12.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years, and the abortion ratio was 200 abortions per 1,000 live births."

Our populations is about 323 million.

You saying its not an issue?

Do you have daughters or a wife?

Of course you have a mother what do you think is wrong with Russia in relation to living their day in and out that this disparity occurs?

Children for Sale
Would $36,000 convince you to have another kid?
By Daniel Gross


Communism is officially dead in the Soviet Union, but the Marxist belief that men and women are essentially economic creatures is alive and well at the Kremlin. In May, Vladimir Putin, alarmed at Russia's declining population, which is falling thanks to short life expectancy and a plummeting birthrate (1.17 children per woman, down from about 2 in 1990), offered a bonus of 250,000 rubles (about $9,200) to women who would have a second child.

www.slate.com...

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: TheScale


What is the extent of rape in the Russian Republic compared to that of China?

What does that say about day to day life in comparison to "In 2013, 664,435 legal induced abortions were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. The abortion rate for 2013 was 12.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years, and the abortion ratio was 200 abortions per 1,000 live births."

Our populations is about 323 million.

You saying its not an issue?

Do you have daughters or a wife?

Of course you have a mother what do you think is wrong with Russia in relation to living their day in and out that this disparity occurs?

yes but your logic is lacking. in what way does continuing with an aggressive stance and staying at odds with russia change any of their internal affairs? none if youd like to know. thus why this has no relevance to the conversation about intel sharing. what your proposing actually reduces any chance of learning such things and going back to the days when the iron curtain kept their internal affairs hidden from the majority of the world. by being more peaceful and working as allies we have the ability to influence russia in certain ways. again though im not sure how u think that will affect abortion rates when the US itself has laws protecting the right of women to make that choice. thats why this entire conversation weve been having is about as whacky as they come imo

a reply to: TheScale


Would you point a weapon at someone who allowed harming there own people to that extent.

Just for starters...


Again we are pointing ICBM's at Russia how can it be appropriate to share, "highly classified information"?

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: TheScale


Would you point a weapon at someone who allowed harming there own people to that extent.

Just for starters...


Again we are pointing ICBM's at Russia how can it be appropriate to share, "highly classified information"?

if its not blatantly obvious to you then i fear there is nothing anyone can say to make it clear. this is a question youll have to answer for yourself.

The stupidity and denial of you right wingers on this board is freaking hilarious! LOL!!