Trump “revealed more information to Russian ambassador than we have shared with our own allies”

A society of golems and zombies living in a post truth society has there ever been such a weak mindless disempowered population in history.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Exactly. I don't think anyone here is claiming Trump did anything illegal. Just incredibly stupid. Like miles above private server stupid. He just had to flex his boner. Who cares about losing an intelligence source?

Everything is classified WhEn POTUS speaks to foreign gobs
Perhaps he shared his favorite porn site

So we call the bull snip when the fake news outles launch an outrageous story against trump, but when the current admin spews bullsnip against foreign governments based on anonymous sources, its like gospel....

Of the hypocr... blah blah blah..

Why arent we this inquisitive when our government put out propaganda against other countries which we claim cant even access the internet properly, all based on secret sources...

Well that was fun for 20 minutes.

Ia reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense

Very questionable.

Ironically, the only named source in the Washington Post's article is National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster who notes that the entire story is nothing more than "fake news." Of course, that didn't stop them from running the headline anyway.

SOURCE

a reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense

So I have been watching the news and still haven't really heard anything. More he said she said. Cant really make heads or tails of this. I think I will just sit over here on the sideline and see if anything happens.

a reply to: Tarzan the apeman.

Well it's "anonymous sources" versus a bunch of people publicly saying the story is false. Your call.

I imagine the snowflakes in the Alt-Left are melting just a little bit more at this point, LMMFLWAO!

National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster: "I was in the room. It didn't happen."

Meanwhile, somewhere in the dark and dreary woods near Chappaqua, Bill Clinton's wife just found a "pretty rock" under a butternut tree, heh heh heh...

originally posted by: MysticPearl
Highly suggests it's a coordinated attack with the Post simply being the middle-man. Question is who's behind all this.

Jeff Bezos is a safe bet.
www.recode.net...

In May, after learning of the large team of Washington Post reporters looking into his past, Trump told conservative TV commentator Sean Hannity that Bezos was using the paper to damage Trump’s chances because he feared what a President Trump would mean for Amazon.

"He thinks I'll go after him for antitrust," Trump said at the time. "Because he's got a huge antitrust problem because he's controlling so much, Amazon is controlling so much of what they are doing.

"He's using the Washington Post, which is peanuts, he's using that for political purposes to save Amazon in terms of taxes and in terms of antitrust."

Bezos has spent a LOT of money trying to unseat Trump, and it has all been wasted. His WaPo is about the only thing left for him to keep using against Trump, which he has used for months now... fascinatingly for him, all he's really managed to do is turn a once somewhat respected news outlet into the 2017 version of the Weekly World News, complete with weekly Batboy meets ET at White House type headlines. Journalism is dead.

Nothing more than anti-Trump propaganda. Anything to make Trump look bad and try to discredit him.

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
Nothing more than anti-Trump propaganda. Anything to make Trump look bad and try to discredit him.

And as usual, quickly debunked by the facts.

originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: Sillyolme

Where is the evidence that the Russians hacked the election ? The DNC admits to rigging the election, we have them admitting in open court that they did that against their own candidate. But not one string of nothing to show Russia did anything, I think it is stupid to not agree that yes they did and have attempted to influence every election we have ever had but we do it to them as well...we have actually instituted coups in other countries for Christ sake and we don't expect it back ?

thewashingtonstandard.com...

Not a single story on any of the big networks or papers about it as I guess everyone thinks its okay ? If its okay then why not report about it...its news isn't it ? The DNC rigged the election, the DNC influenced my vote because I hate Hillary but would have voted for Sanders but I couldn't vote for him because they rigged it...the Russians did nothing to influence my vote as I hated Hillary forever.

I still can't believe Donna Brazile even has a job after her confirmed shady practices.

a reply to: odzeandennz

Government/admin "anonymous sources" are tied to national intel agencies... their "implausible bullsnip" is provided under anonymity because that's their job. The press, on the other hand, shouldn't have access to that classified info plus they use the "anonymous" tags to spew fabrications and shield themselves from culpability.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: marg6043

IMO - You use the bold feature too much.

It is not classified that trump shared classified information with the Russians.

The Classified information he shared with the Russians is classified...very classified in the sense it could burn sources and get agents killed.

The classified information was not shared with the press, only a description of how and why it was classified.

Let me know if you are still confused.

Note: The thin skinned freak-out POTUS and his minions have not denied any of it. The CIA and NSA have refused to publicly deny it.

Trump is a danger to this country in multiple ways.

LOL...the CIA and NSA not commenting doesn't mean they have refused. I love the spin though.

It usually means that the story is so stupid it isn't worth the time to pay someone to comment.

Stick with that dishonest denial...hold on to it...

I have a top secret super super secret source that told me there source is wrong. Funny how journalists think anonymous sources are news without anything to corroborate the claims. Hit the point now if they say anonymous source its just flat out made up. Worst part is this is stupid because the president has authorization to determine security levels on information.