Rod Rosenstein -There Will NOT Be a Special Prosecutor in the Russian Interference Probe.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The dems didnt give her special treatment. What are you talking about???

Comey overstepping his bounds to suggest what action should follow, which is the job of attorney general.

Whom if you remember met with Hillary's husband privately.

And through all of which Obama supported someone who broke the law and was under investigation.

Is this some kind of selective memories or something?

No I don't have selective memory, because I'm independent and look at every administration the same.

Selective memory is something blind partisan fan boys have (wink wink )

You right wing idiots might want to take note that Comey didn't think a special prosecutor is needed too? WHY? Because the FBI has intelligence gathered by several US allies and will be moving methodically to get this autocrat out of office.

By the way, justice Roberts and Keagan are being briefed on high treason charges. People are going to jail after this no matter how hard you right wing dolts try to keep your head in the sand.

originally posted by: carewemust
May 12, 2017

This is a good decision from Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein. After all, there are THREE SIMULTANEOUS investigations ongoing into how the mighty and powerful country of Russia affected our 2016 Presidential election. Hundreds of people have been working on this every day...for MONTHS.

""Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein doesn't find it necessary at this point to appoint a special prosecutor to probe Russia's interference in the presidential election, CNN reported Friday, citing sources familiar with his thinking.

One source told CNN that Rosenstein is unlikely to make a change unless the FBI investigation seems endangered. Rosenstein has reportedly vowed to lawmakers and staff that he plans to allow the bureau’s probe to keep operating free of White House pressures.

Democrats have called for a special prosecutor in the wake of President Trump on Tuesday firing FBI Director James Comey, who was leading the bureau's investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Senate Minority Dick Whip Durbin (D-Ill.) said Friday that Rosenstein must either name a special prosecutor or resign.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, joined that call on Friday evening, arguing that “these investigations are far too important to risk disruption, delay or interference.""

SOURCE: thehill.com...

--------------

QUESTION: What is the PRIMARY REASON for these 3 simultaneous investigations?

I thought it was ascertaining exactly how RUSSIA was able to affect our election. But many politicians and MSM outlets say that the primary thrust is uncovering collusion between Trump's people and Russian contacts. Some others say that the "unmasking" and "leaking" aspects are now center stage.

Since they utilize so many resources, it's probably best to start winding them down if nothing meaningful is uncovered by a certain date, don't cha think?

-CareWeMust

a reply to: carewemust

Sorry, NOPE!

The two scoops is real.

Posted too soon, nevermind. More information needed.

originally posted by: SeekingAlpha
You right wing idiots might want to take note that Comey didn't think a special prosecutor is needed too? WHY? Because the FBI has intelligence gathered by several US allies and will be moving methodically to get this autocrat out of office.

By the way, justice Roberts and Keagan are being briefed on high treason charges. People are going to jail after this no matter how hard you right wing dolts try to keep your head in the sand.

originally posted by: carewemust
May 12, 2017

This is a good decision from Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein. After all, there are THREE SIMULTANEOUS investigations ongoing into how the mighty and powerful country of Russia affected our 2016 Presidential election. Hundreds of people have been working on this every day...for MONTHS.

""Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein doesn't find it necessary at this point to appoint a special prosecutor to probe Russia's interference in the presidential election, CNN reported Friday, citing sources familiar with his thinking.

One source told CNN that Rosenstein is unlikely to make a change unless the FBI investigation seems endangered. Rosenstein has reportedly vowed to lawmakers and staff that he plans to allow the bureau’s probe to keep operating free of White House pressures.

Democrats have called for a special prosecutor in the wake of President Trump on Tuesday firing FBI Director James Comey, who was leading the bureau's investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Senate Minority Dick Whip Durbin (D-Ill.) said Friday that Rosenstein must either name a special prosecutor or resign.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, joined that call on Friday evening, arguing that “these investigations are far too important to risk disruption, delay or interference.""

SOURCE: thehill.com...

--------------

QUESTION: What is the PRIMARY REASON for these 3 simultaneous investigations?

I thought it was ascertaining exactly how RUSSIA was able to affect our election. But many politicians and MSM outlets say that the primary thrust is uncovering collusion between Trump's people and Russian contacts. Some others say that the "unmasking" and "leaking" aspects are now center stage.

Since they utilize so many resources, it's probably best to start winding them down if nothing meaningful is uncovered by a certain date, don't cha think?

-CareWeMust

I'm proudly "right wing" and an enthusiastic supporter of President Trump.

Are you calling me an "idiot" and a "dolt"?

a reply to: SeekingAlpha

Feel free to link to your false claim about the supreme court being briefed on treason. Considering they are prohibited from having a meeting of that type I am curious how you will walk back your false clam.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

The attorney General who said she'd stay out of it because of her meeting with Bill Clinton? That AG?
And before you jump on it I know she didn't formally recuse herself but did announce that she would go with the FBI recommendations.
Comey didn't work the case alone he was head of the department. The agents who did work it would have said so if he ignored incriminating evidence. Washington is a plumbers dream. Leaks all over the place. Incriminating evidence would have been leaked by now.