It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You are confusing sentencing with being charged. DOJ does not determine the sentencing. Calm down.
Go research mandatory minimums then get back to me. You clearly don't know what you are talking about.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Nickn3
Sessions is reversing all the progress we've made!
You've nailed it there. Isn't it great!
So you agree with the US having the world's highest incarceration rate? That's not the land of the free at all.
originally posted by: RainbowPhoenix
...
The scariest part is realizing just what a large percentage of this country supports this narcissistic megalomaniac and every asinine decision he and his acolytes make. Cheering him on as he and his goons lord over this country with their oppressive and regressive policies.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Trueman
Seriously do you people not know the history behind mandatory minimum sentences? Why are you just dismissing this because I'm a liberal?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Mike.Ockizard
Your right the police unions and private prison lobby do.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
The directive states "provable" charges. If they are provable then I don't see the issue here.
I do not like the policy of mandatory minimum sentencing. But that isn't actually what is being discussed with respect to what the directive from Sessions is saying.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: UKTruth
What has the incarceration rate got to do with anything? Are you suggesting that if there are too many criminals , society should accept it and let some people off? If so, you sound as radical as the last administration.
It's only a crime because we say it is a crime. That is it. There is no reason to put non-violent people behind bars.
Nonsense. If you don't like a law work on changing the law. Sessions job is to enforce the law. It would be a dereliction of his duty to turn a blind eye to crime. God forbid you ever get your way and realise a country where only violent crime is punished.