It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: Violater1
This has been an catastrophe waiting to happen for years:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: Violater1
Scary, huh?
I saw your thread....and Hanford rang a bell....hard to believe that the problem has been known for so long ...and they either drag their feet....or do nothing.
originally posted by: rickymouse
We shouldn't be creating this kind of dangerous stuff if we cannot make it safe when we are finished. Handing this mess down to future generations is not acceptable. People running things are not too smart, they allowed these kind of things to be done, it should have been done right years ago or we should have never started using nuclear energy
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: rickymouse
We shouldn't be creating this kind of dangerous stuff if we cannot make it safe when we are finished. Handing this mess down to future generations is not acceptable. People running things are not too smart, they allowed these kind of things to be done, it should have been done right years ago or we should have never started using nuclear energy
We have a facility to store this stuff. Yucca Mountain was over engineered, and capable of storing waste for at least 50-100 years (time enough to get a space elevator).
Blame Congress, they built it and then defunded it.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: rickymouse
We shouldn't be creating this kind of dangerous stuff if we cannot make it safe when we are finished. Handing this mess down to future generations is not acceptable. People running things are not too smart, they allowed these kind of things to be done, it should have been done right years ago or we should have never started using nuclear energy
We have a facility to store this stuff. Yucca Mountain was over engineered, and capable of storing waste for at least 50-100 years (time enough to get a space elevator).
Blame Congress, they built it and then defunded it.
originally posted by: rickymouse
Yucca mountain is a temporary storage area, a very expensive one. It just makes sure that the materials will not have to be dealt with by our generation. We should be paying our bills as we make them.
Price tag on the Fukishima cleanup is estimated to be 190 billion dollars. Thats if you can put a price tag on it. How much will it cost to clean up Hanford?
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: rickymouse
Yucca mountain is a temporary storage area, a very expensive one. It just makes sure that the materials will not have to be dealt with by our generation. We should be paying our bills as we make them.
I won't deny Hanford is a mess, truth is Yucca still wouldn't solve it. But, nuclear is still the safest form of power generation we have. Take a look at the death print of various energy sources. Nuclear is by far the safest, it just has the most visible mishaps.
Citing the 2014 Hanford Lifecycle Scope Schedule and Cost report, the 2014 estimated cost of the remaining Hanford clean up is $113.6 billion – more than $3 billion per year for the next six years, with a lower cost projection of approximately $2 billion per year until 2046.
originally posted by: Leonidas
a reply to: dianajune
With all due respect, WTF do you think he can bring to the table at this point? Keep on mind that the people around here refer to Hanford as "Nagasaki's Revenge"...this is a big messy problem that goes back 80 years
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: Violater1
Scary, huh?
I saw your thread....and Hanford rang a bell....hard to believe that the problem has been known for so long ...and they either drag their feet....or do nothing.