Former Obama security adviser declines invite to testify

a reply to: marg6043

The Obama rat will take the fifth and that is fine with me, she will never have any standing in Washington at all for the rest of her life.

Let the filthy rat take the 5th...it will only prove what we already know. Dirty rat!

She obviously has a lot to hide.
Obama's administration was just one big criminal enterprise, from funding terrorists to using govt power to persecute enemies.
Shocking.

I am fed up with Democrats. Totally fed up!

They lie, delay, obfuscate, plead the fifth, blame others, twist facts like a pretzel, ignore real facts, and then, delay some more. I am fed up with their tactics.

They couldn't care less about what is right and best for The American citizens of this country. They have become a mafia-style political gang that cares only for party, "by any means necessary", and "the ends justify the means".

Shame on Susan Rice.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa
She's under scrutiny by republicans you mean.
She's not under any kind of official scrutiny. Jesus the disconnect from reality is amazing .
She's not even a part of the Russian interfering investigation and has nothing to do with this.
The invite is a distraction. Probably instigated by the Orange dictator. Who's a lying sack of poop and wants to try to distract from the real focus of the hearings.
But I see everybody already abandoned this thread so I guess I'm done here.

You do know the DOJ Inspector General has an open investigation into Lynch and Comey?

It was an IG referral to the FBI that got the ball rolling on Hilllary's illegal server having classified emails on it....oh you forgot I guess

Or do you choose to ignore that as well?

a reply to: queenofswords

I am right there with you, to think that I have voted Democrat once in a while, I have not clue what in the hell is going on with the party, they are in shambles, I mean they are destroying themselves and have no dependable leadership.

I can ask anybody to please give me a reliable leader in the Democratic party right now and no even their faithful base can come out with one.

They are proving that when it comes to power is them or nobody else and the hell with the nation and the people.

a reply to: marg6043

TMN is hardly a credible source for factual or unbiased news of any kind.

You might even want to check their actual rating on Media Bias/Fact Check.

It's literally rated as a " Questionable Source" with "Extreme Bias."

Nice try though.

delete

a reply to: Flatfish

Former National Security Adviser Susan Rice Declines Invitation to Testify on Russia

CNN ran the original story after all.

time.com...

www.cnn.com...

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Flatfish

Former National Security Adviser Susan Rice Declines Invitation to Testify on Russia

CNN ran the original story after all.

time.com...

www.cnn.com...

I'm not contesting whether or not she declined Lindsey Graham's invite to testify before the committee, I think that's pretty obvious.

It's all the other bullsh#t accusations and insinuations that conservatives are associating with her decision not to accept the invite that I'm talking about.

You people act like she's offered to testify in exchange for immunity or something.

Does the name Michael Flynn come to mind?

a reply to: Flatfish

You know she is been around as been in politics since the 90s, she does have a record that can be followed very well.

She also have align herself with many political figures is not hard to see from where the comments comes from.

a reply to: RickinVa

Wait a minute. Comey is under investigation and still leads another investigation and nobody has a problem with that? Are there no contingency plans in place for these type of situations? Am i the only one who finds that not only odd but highly suspicious.

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Trump is still looking to prove something that never happened.

you mean like "Evil Russians hacking the US Election" just after we were assured by Obama that hacking the election was impossible?

LOL, you people make me smile.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: RickinVa

Wait a minute. Comey is under investigation and still leads another investigation and nobody has a problem with that? Are there no contingency plans in place for these type of situations? Am i the only one who finds that not only odd but highly suspicious.

The IG's do internal reviews....it's not the same as an FBI investigation. If they find probable cause, then they would send request to the Department in question, which in this case would be Jeff Sessions since he is the current AG.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Flatfish

You know she is been around as been in politics since the 90s, she does have a record that can be followed very well.

She also have align herself with many political figures is not hard to see from where the comments comes from.

I can see where they're coming from alright. They're coming straight out of someone's ass, that's where.

Despite what you may believe, Susan Rice has a pretty good record as a public servant which kinda explains why shy garnered unanimous approval of the entire senate when nominated to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N..

You may question her judgment with respect to the Sudan/Osama Bin Laden issue, but she was not alone in her opinion and/or advice on the situation at the time.

Much like healthcare, the issues at hand were far more complicated than most people know.

a reply to: Flatfish

Well, despite your view of her good track record as a public servant, she is obviously hiding something and her refusal will only add fuel to the flames.

"...but she was not alone in her opinion and/or advice on the situation at the time"
Cool, she didn't work alone, got it.

"...far more complicated..."

Well, you don't know that. Logic says of course its complicated because its government, but thats everyday and thus, no excuse.

On the surface, it does look like she may have something to hide, but there's obvious politicization going on here from both sides.

On the dems' side, it's clear they don't want her testimony to become a distraction from Yates' testimony, which will completely contradict the WH narrative. They want to keep the focus of this hearing on Yates and Clapper. I'm guessing she's been advised by Whitehouse and crew to come up with a reason for avoiding this one.

On the repubs' side, they clearly want to steer the discussion away from Yates and focus on the unmasking and whether or not it was politically motivated. The problem with that angle is that if she did indeed have legitimate reasons to unmask some of the participants in the lawfully collected communications, then she most likely won't be able to talk about it in a public hearing due to the ongoing investigation.

I suspect we'll hear from her at some point, one way or another.

originally posted by: Sillyolme


It wasn't a bipartisan invite.
She was prepared to testify until she learned that.

Is a subpoena a bipartisan invite?
What will her excuse be then?

a reply to: Flatfish

Susan Rice is all ready been know as a liar, her Benghazi link blunder is all its needed to keep her from having any position of power ever again.

And that is a fact that you can take to the bank and not is no coming from anybody rear end but Rice herself.

a reply to: burntheships

They are not going to subpoena her.

a reply to: marg6043

No she's not known as a liar.
Know who is???
Yeah you do.