It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: deadlyhope
Have a friend that's open to scientific evidence, and actually really intelligent in a myriad of scientific topics, but evolution is one where he won't yet follow modern science thought. He believes in the 6000 year old earth, etc...
One main topic I need help with is he desires proof of species changing, any species really - have we found fossil records showing the transition of our ancestor into both humans and primates?
Also, he will bring up that there's a lack of proof that species can entirely change over time. Such as oceanic species becoming land species.
Then, I bring up neanderthal and cromagnum(sp) and he mentions that we share some of the same genes but the DNA is entirely different...
Is he correct or on the evidence based side in any of this?
I can't really refute him because I have no good example of a swimming dinosaur becoming a flying creature after millions of years, etc, and I don't know enough about human evolution.
Google searches are not as helpful as I had hoped, so here I am.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: deadlyhope
Have a friend that's open to scientific evidence, and actually really intelligent in a myriad of scientific topics, but evolution is one where he won't yet follow modern science thought. He believes in the 6000 year old earth, etc...
One main topic I need help with is he desires proof of species changing, any species really - have we found fossil records showing the transition of our ancestor into both humans and primates?
Also, he will bring up that there's a lack of proof that species can entirely change over time. Such as oceanic species becoming land species.
Then, I bring up neanderthal and cromagnum(sp) and he mentions that we share some of the same genes but the DNA is entirely different...
Is he correct or on the evidence based side in any of this?
I can't really refute him because I have no good example of a swimming dinosaur becoming a flying creature after millions of years, etc, and I don't know enough about human evolution.
Google searches are not as helpful as I had hoped, so here I am.
have you tried the abovetopsecret search engine? dozens of threads already exist pertaining to your questions, i strongly recommend you use it. it is the little magnifying glass icon next to your inbox at the top right.
have we found fossil records showing the transition of our ancestor into both humans and primates?
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: deadlyhope
Have a friend that's open to scientific evidence, and actually really intelligent in a myriad of scientific topics, but evolution is one where he won't yet follow modern science thought. He believes in the 6000 year old earth, etc...
One main topic I need help with is he desires proof of species changing, any species really - have we found fossil records showing the transition of our ancestor into both humans and primates?
Also, he will bring up that there's a lack of proof that species can entirely change over time. Such as oceanic species becoming land species.
Then, I bring up neanderthal and cromagnum(sp) and he mentions that we share some of the same genes but the DNA is entirely different...
Is he correct or on the evidence based side in any of this?
I can't really refute him because I have no good example of a swimming dinosaur becoming a flying creature after millions of years, etc, and I don't know enough about human evolution.
Google searches are not as helpful as I had hoped, so here I am.
have you tried the abovetopsecret search engine? dozens of threads already exist pertaining to your questions, i strongly recommend you use it. it is the little magnifying glass icon next to your inbox at the top right.
Why even post if you wont answer the mans question? Not everyone wants to or knows how to use your broken search engine feature (that yes, NEVER works).
There is no conclusive evidence to support evolution as is at present, only a theory.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: deadlyhope
Have a friend that's open to scientific evidence, and actually really intelligent in a myriad of scientific topics, but evolution is one where he won't yet follow modern science thought. He believes in the 6000 year old earth, etc...
One main topic I need help with is he desires proof of species changing, any species really - have we found fossil records showing the transition of our ancestor into both humans and primates?
Also, he will bring up that there's a lack of proof that species can entirely change over time. Such as oceanic species becoming land species.
Then, I bring up neanderthal and cromagnum(sp) and he mentions that we share some of the same genes but the DNA is entirely different...
Is he correct or on the evidence based side in any of this?
I can't really refute him because I have no good example of a swimming dinosaur becoming a flying creature after millions of years, etc, and I don't know enough about human evolution.
Google searches are not as helpful as I had hoped, so here I am.
have you tried the abovetopsecret search engine? dozens of threads already exist pertaining to your questions, i strongly recommend you use it. it is the little magnifying glass icon next to your inbox at the top right.
Why even post if you wont answer the mans question? Not everyone wants to or knows how to use your broken search engine feature (that yes, NEVER works).
There is no conclusive evidence to support evolution as is at present, only a theory.
people are continuously bringing such concerns to these forums no matter how many times they are answered in previous exchanges. i was attempting to avoid the pattern that can be observed in the previously mentioned dozens of threads that are almost literally carbon copies of each other. Im already suspicious that this thread is also a trap, an exercise in futility like so many before it. people dont want to learn, they just want to be right.
deuces.
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: deadlyhope
Have a friend that's open to scientific evidence, and actually really intelligent in a myriad of scientific topics, but evolution is one where he won't yet follow modern science thought. He believes in the 6000 year old earth, etc...
One main topic I need help with is he desires proof of species changing, any species really - have we found fossil records showing the transition of our ancestor into both humans and primates?
Also, he will bring up that there's a lack of proof that species can entirely change over time. Such as oceanic species becoming land species.
Then, I bring up neanderthal and cromagnum(sp) and he mentions that we share some of the same genes but the DNA is entirely different...
Is he correct or on the evidence based side in any of this?
I can't really refute him because I have no good example of a swimming dinosaur becoming a flying creature after millions of years, etc, and I don't know enough about human evolution.
Google searches are not as helpful as I had hoped, so here I am.
have you tried the abovetopsecret search engine? dozens of threads already exist pertaining to your questions, i strongly recommend you use it. it is the little magnifying glass icon next to your inbox at the top right.
Why even post if you wont answer the mans question? Not everyone wants to or knows how to use your broken search engine feature (that yes, NEVER works).
There is no conclusive evidence to support evolution as is at present, only a theory.
people are continuously bringing such concerns to these forums no matter how many times they are answered in previous exchanges. i was attempting to avoid the pattern that can be observed in the previously mentioned dozens of threads that are almost literally carbon copies of each other. Im already suspicious that this thread is also a trap, an exercise in futility like so many before it. people dont want to learn, they just want to be right.
deuces.
if you don't like it stop posting.
originally posted by: deadlyhope
a reply to: SgtHamsandwich
Thank you for the link, my friend won't accept speculation as much though - he wants to see absolute proof that this thing eventually turned into a chicken or what not. Wouldn't their be tens or hundreds of changes over time that we could find evidence of?
I read all the article I could in the time I had, but it doesn't seem to definitively show its link to modern birds, just similar characteristics.
originally posted by: SgtHamsandwich
One of the best cases is from dinosaur to bird species change.
Archaeopteryx