It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bloodymarvelous
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
I disagree. I think if time travel is ever invented it will be based on string theory, which is what I based my scenario on.
I'll address your scenario.
Let's say you find a planet 200 LY away. You go to your time machine based on Pluto, you go back in time when your grandpa was a child. You warp space-time and instantly arrive at that planet. You do some things to alter their history at that faraway planet right? You can because you haven't previously observed anything from that planet.
What happens if you then warp back to earth after spending only a few days at that faraway planet, and you go and find your grandpa and kill him?
You don't solve the paradox by just avoiding it.
Traveling to another dimension is exactly the same problem.
The underlying assumption to Star Trek time travel is that time travel is only possible to the past of other dimensions. You can't go back and kill your grand father because time travel to your own dimension is impossible.
But why couldn't you travel to another dimension, and then time travel from there to this dimension's past?
originally posted by: makemap
Time travel is dangerous. You don't know what outcome will come out for your future self unless your trying to prevent it first place by erasing the person from doing it.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: bloodymarvelous
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
I disagree. I think if time travel is ever invented it will be based on string theory, which is what I based my scenario on.
I'll address your scenario.
Let's say you find a planet 200 LY away. You go to your time machine based on Pluto, you go back in time when your grandpa was a child. You warp space-time and instantly arrive at that planet. You do some things to alter their history at that faraway planet right? You can because you haven't previously observed anything from that planet.
What happens if you then warp back to earth after spending only a few days at that faraway planet, and you go and find your grandpa and kill him?
You don't solve the paradox by just avoiding it.
Traveling to another dimension is exactly the same problem.
The underlying assumption to Star Trek time travel is that time travel is only possible to the past of other dimensions. You can't go back and kill your grand father because time travel to your own dimension is impossible.
But why couldn't you travel to another dimension, and then time travel from there to this dimension's past?
Good question. I thought of that already and addressed that issue at the end of my first post.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: bloodymarvelous
You go back and watch your grandpa only to find that the you that arrives to kill him never comes. You conclude that you had actually traveled to a parallel world with astoundingly close resemblance to the one you killed your grandpa in...
So what the hell is going on?
You run all of the data obtained throughout the entire experiment through your super A.I. computer. And after a few long days of work you reach a conclusion.
All parallel world's are on the same river of time although in different states on this river.
originally posted by: bloodymarvelous
This is a pretty good video about the experiment if you watch it all the way to the end.
www.youtube.com...
He talks about using electrons in a double slit experiment, and then about using photons. But there's no need to get confused about that.
You can use either one. Using either electrons or photons with a double still you will get basically the same result.