It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: RobertConrad
I am convinced that many of the numbers quoted in the Bible are symbolic rather than literal.
Thus "7" is always a number associated with God.
"70" combines two such numbers- 7 (associated with God) and 10 (associated with completeness). Thus Jeremiah prophesied that the interval between the fall of Jerusalem and the fall of Babylon would be 70 years. This did not come true, as a literal number of years, but the interval was surely "the fullness of the period which God had appointed". I would take that to be what Jeremiah meant.
if the numbers quoted are symbolic rather than literal, they cannot be used to mark off years on a calendar and predict end-times periods.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: RobertConrad
No, 2 Peter is about people who doubt THAT the end will come.
I am merely doubting that we can predict exactly WHEN.
Our salvation depends on believing in Christ and his return, but it does not depend on identifying a specific year.
He told Noah at a certain time that he had placed 120 years on that system of things:
His perverse version says (2 Peter 3:8) . . .However, do not let this escape your notice, beloved ones. . . (2 Peter 3:9) . . ., but he is patient with you . . . the ect periods let us know he has perposely takenit from the context. as to what is it we are not to be ignorant with and why God is longsuffering.
2Pe 3:8 ¶ But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
9 ¶ The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Things that are different are not the same. Critical is not the same as perilous. See what was added to the Scriptures as well "critical times hard to deal with will be here". Any man worth his salt knows that covetous is not the same as "lovers of money". Change it just enough to confuse boasters vs boastful, Proud vs haughty, but leave enough of the preserved word to cause confusion and questing in the mind of the hearer to make disciples after their own selves.
2Ti 3:1 ¶ This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
The ability of the Watchtower to accurately foretell the meaning of 1914 is a great source of faith for Jehovah's Witnesses, unaware of what the Watchtower said prior to 1914, as nothing that Russell said about 1914 came to pass. For Russell and early Watchtower followers, the second of October 1914 was expected to be the the conclusion of this system of things.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: RobertConrad
Whats derogatory about repeating what your own elders said?
www.jwfacts.com...
The ability of the Watchtower to accurately foretell the meaning of 1914 is a great source of faith for Jehovah's Witnesses, unaware of what the Watchtower said prior to 1914, as nothing that Russell said about 1914 came to pass. For Russell and early Watchtower followers, the second of October 1914 was expected to be the the conclusion of this system of things.
Would that be only a short period of time, a few years? No. Just as in Noah's day the end lasted 120 years, so in our time, the "last days have already lasted over 100 years. If they are to last 120 years, then the end will come in 2034. I am not saying that is the case. But it is not a long way off. Whether it be in a year or few, or only a decade or two more. It can't be that far away.
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: RobertConrad
Would that be only a short period of time, a few years? No. Just as in Noah's day the end lasted 120 years, so in our time, the "last days have already lasted over 100 years. If they are to last 120 years, then the end will come in 2034. I am not saying that is the case. But it is not a long way off. Whether it be in a year or few, or only a decade or two more. It can't be that far away.
I am somewhat in the dark here. What end are you talking about? The end as Christianity understands the end of this existence in the second resurrection of Revelation? Or are you understanding the end as rabbinic Judaism believes the end shall be?
Christianity believes that there will be a first resurrection as is explained in Revelation but that Jacobs Trouble will not be the end of this earth. After that first resurrection (which is yet to come) there is another 1,000 years and then the end of this creation. By this Christian doctrine we have 1,000 + years at least before the end of creation.
Rabbinic philosophy declares the end after one universal resurrection (which is yet to come) of all creation and the golden age of a one world Jewish government. After this resurrection and the golden era have expired then the end of this creation will come. You can't mix the two together because they are separate doctrines. In either case it cannot happen overnight as most people are led to believe.
So what are we talking about here when we say "the end?" Are we talking about the end of one era but not of the world? Are we taking about the return of the Christ? Or are we talking about the return of the house of David as the world ruler?
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: RobertConrad
However, current affairs suggest that we may have to wait a long time before we hear a world-wide cry of "There is peace and security".
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: RobertConrad
Passages like "On a day when he does not expect" are about a sudden and unexpected loss of peace, the dramatic arrival of destruction at a time when people are feeling relaxed and secure.
They don't amount to a suggestion that there will be a sudden and unexpected arrival of peace.
In fact nobody, in practice, would be able to feel a psychological sense of security until apparent peace had existed for some time. They would spend the early days of peace anxiously looking over their shoulders.