US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

Seems pretty apparent what happened to me...

Assad pulled a fast one and cut Putin off at the knees by hiding and using some chemical weapons. Russia pulled out when they found out (Russia has been all over that base). Putin let Trump know they were clear. Trump kicked the snot out of Assad's airbase and weapons storage. Putin probably called up Assad afterward and told him not to ever pull a stunt like that again or he'll let ISIS have his head.

Win-win-win.

Next!

Way to go TRUMP!

I supported Trump right up to this point.........now he can go f*** himself.

a reply to: EternalShadow

i've posted about that twice, heard it on fox and they say it was filmed by a air asset in the area. i also posted what the DOD/Pentagon says was the flight path of the aircraft that dropped the weapon on page thirty six of this thread. it has a picture of the town with a cloud on the right hand side over the buildings.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Agreed! We're defiantly on the winning team striking down all the rouge country's of the world. Trump is obviously the best man for the job. Even Putin (Vladimir) runs from Da Trump!

Next we should mop of North Korea and Iraq and Irann and Berlin and probably other places like in the pacific ocean where china is starting to make a noise and then we can take Manchuria and establish USA as #1 again just as Trump promised!!

a reply to: Flatcoat

Great! Move to Syria. They're looking for some new recruits right about now.

If we are to believe that Putin really is an ally of Assad, then Putin has to respond to these strikes. If he doesn't, then it sets a precedent and shows Russia to be soft where America is involved.

07:00
Kremlin response: 'significant damage to US-Russia ties'

In its first public response to the airstrikes, the Kremlin has issued a strong statement condemning the US move as “aggression against a sovereign nation”.

Moscow said the strikes had been carried out on an “invented pretext” and claimed the Syrian army did not have chemical weapons.

The strikes, it said, would do “significant damage to US-Russia ties” and created a “serious obstacle” to creating an international coalition to defeat Isis.

Russian president Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin said, views the strikes as an attempt to deflect world attention from civilian deaths in Iraq – where at least 150 people died in a series of coalition airstrikes in Mosul last month.

originally posted by: FuggleHop
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Agreed! We're defiantly on the winning team striking down all the rouge country's of the world. Trump is obviously the best man for the job. Even Putin (Vladimir) runs from Da Trump!

Next we should mop of North Korea and Iraq and Irann and Berlin and probably other places like in the pacific ocean where china is starting to make a noise and then we can take Manchuria and establish USA as #1 again just as Trump promised!!

That's a stupid idea.

Iraq are your allies, war with North Korea would be ruinous, Berlin? What has Berlin done?

Oh, don't attack Iran either, they literally haven't done anything.

a reply to: elysiumfire
If Russia didn't respond with their air defences and jammers then Putin has lost this round imo.
Syria is the one place Russia could go military and not whine to the UN.

a reply to: elysiumfire

No, it just shows Syria wasn't playing by the rules and they got spanked.

Putin doesn't look bad at all. He stepped out of the way. If he hadn't, he'd have had the chemical attack on his head. Smart move on Putin's part.

a reply to: Ohanka

#1 wrong. They all need to be taught lessons for defying the USA and trading with china.

originally posted by: Flatcoat
I supported Trump right up to this point.........now he can go f*** himself.

For bombing an airbase and not escalating a conflict.

OK....lol

Get back to me when he actually starts a war and I might agree with you.

He send a strong message to the world, it just went over your head.

originally posted by: haman10

07:00
Kremlin response: 'significant damage to US-Russia ties'

Moscow said the strikes had been carried out on an “invented pretext” and claimed the Syrian army did not have chemical weapons.

Is Russia-Kremlin implying that THEY are the ones who killed civilians with chemical weapons this week?

originally posted by: haman10

07:00
Kremlin response: 'significant damage to US-Russia ties'

In its first public response to the airstrikes, the Kremlin has issued a strong statement condemning the US move as “aggression against a sovereign nation”.

Moscow said the strikes had been carried out on an “invented pretext” and claimed the Syrian army did not have chemical weapons.

The strikes, it said, would do “significant damage to US-Russia ties” and created a “serious obstacle” to creating an international coalition to defeat Isis.

Russian president Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin said, views the strikes as an attempt to deflect world attention from civilian deaths in Iraq – where at least 150 people died in a series of coalition airstrikes in Mosul last month.

So Russia has nothing. Nothing.

Trump just made them look weak on the world stage and he just showed American strength and backed our red lines for all future countries to note.

a reply to: carewemust

Last I checked Russia's position was that the chemicals were in terrorist possession and the building that contained them was bombed leading to the outrage.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
Seems pretty apparent what happened to me...

Assad pulled a fast one and cut Putin off at the knees by hiding and using some chemical weapons. Russia pulled out when they found out (Russia has been all over that base). Putin let Trump know they were clear. Trump kicked the snot out of Assad's airbase and weapons storage. Putin probably called up Assad afterward and told him not to ever pull a stunt like that again or he'll let ISIS have his head.

Win-win-win.

Next!

Way to go TRUMP!

Derp derp derp

1- there is Zero evidence indicating Syria did the chemical attack

whose more likely to do it? FSA or Syria?

2-what happened to kids in musil who were heartlessly murdered by US?

3-ISIS just launched a large-scale attack on the same province that US attacked. whats your reponse to this?

helping ISIS much?

originally posted by: avgguy
Well this it what all of the libs wanted, hope they're happy.

And once again the cult response is immediately 'DEMS' FAULT!!!!1'

Christ's sake change the record

Simple mans view from the bottom of the world here. The door is open to all sorts of # now . super powers and little powers are going to war,not right now,but this is a test from the big boys to the allies to do a muster check. The big boys will throw a few Biffs and the younger fellas behind the bike shed will rush in,and lose the most face. I guarantee you,trump will do something to nk,and have at it there too. Its almost like Germany again,fighting on two fronts, which way to look?. I'm glad we are at the are end if the world down here.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: carewemust

Last I checked Russia's position was that the chemicals were in terrorist possession and the building that contained them was bombed leading to the outrage.

Oh..I see. So one of the factions bombed a building which contained chemical weapons that terrorists had stored inside?

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: EternalShadow

i've posted about that twice, heard it on fox and they say it was filmed by a air asset in the area. i also posted what the DOD/Pentagon says was the flight path of the aircraft that dropped the weapon on page thirty six of this thread. it has a picture of the town with a cloud on the right hand side over the buildings.

You're overlooking my point...how did an air asset (most likely an airforce TACP or JTAC) on the ground know to film that exact strike?? IF 'professionally' filmed I could see it as Intel gathering, in which aircraft identification would be included as well making it a slam dunk. However, it isn't. IF it's amateur footage, how in the F# did they know????