It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HeathenJessie
a reply to: Willtell
Yeah, they're really quite different.
I still think it's a great movie, I don't think Kubrick intended to make a faithful adaptation of the book. Changes he made were usually pretty deliberate and have some kind of meaning or purpose. Or maybe he was more careless than people think and prone to making very obvious mistakes. I want to believe the former as opposed to the latter but it's really just personal opinion.
When you think about it, the book works well as it is but would a truly failthful adaptation to film be good? It's a reasonably meaty volume...
I tend to look at Kubrick adaptations to be more a vehicle for something Stanley wants to convey as opposed to trying to convey the message of the author. I suppose we'll never really know, but as film I reckon it works really well and there's enough to make it watchable multiple times.
And if that doesn't quite float your boat...there's always the performance of Nicholson to sweeten the deal, he was awesome in that film.
My only real criticism is the performance of Shelley Duval, I never really liked her very much...to me she'll always be Popeye's goofy girlfriend. Her hysterical flailing and whining towards the end of the film got quite irritating at times.
originally posted by: HeathenJessie
a reply to: Willtell
Sure, it's all good.
Out of interest, what is your favourite Kubrick movie?
originally posted by: Dutchowl
King could certainly do it instead of wasting his time with those lame stories he keeps churning out.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Dutchowl
King could certainly do it instead of wasting his time with those lame stories he keeps churning out.
King did a sequel to The Shinning called Doctor Sleep.
And how would he free his dad? He dies in a boiler explosion.
The intriguing thing about The Shining was the hidden messages Kubrick put in pointing to the Apollo Moon Landing.
And how would he free his dad? He dies in a boiler explosion.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
Kubrick did away with the boiler explosion in the film. Jack still dies, so we presume, but that was a strong deviation from the book (as you've pointed out).
Anyway I'm way too critical because after finishing that book and turning off the lights I immediately had to turn them back on again and the only movie to ever do that to me was The Exorsist.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
I never felt like any movie did his work justice.