Hopefully Trump government is now survieling Obama

a reply to: Phage

Yes, everyone foreign call/email/video chat is intercepted, incoming or outgoing overseas. Well, thanks to leaks, we now know it's also us citizens, period, as well.

re: can o worms

Oh yeah, definitely, which is why I earlier replied with 'interestin'. Nothin we can do but watch.

a reply to: Neil4No1

Yes, everyone foreign call/email/video chat is intercepted, incoming or outgoing overseas.

No. Targeted foreign agents. Authorized by warrant.

a reply to: Phage

No, ALL communications worldwide are pretty much recorded, regardless. Being able to peep in on any of it yes, requires supposed suspicion to unmask a U.S. citizen n all that was supposedly done to Trump. But as we see with all this Rice/Obama n Co corruption, anyone can break the law n get away with it, until they get caught.

And if legal n true, why couldn't Trump use those same intel tools used against him to find further corruption supposedly done? DNC is already legit corrupt, it's all intertwined, tangled weave in all, just gotta find mama spider.

a reply to: Neil4No1

No, ALL communications worldwide are pretty much recorded, regardless.

In one, central location? That's a lot of data. How do you know this?

But as we see with all this Rice/Obama n Co corruption, anyone can break the law n get away with it, until they get caught.

What law was broken?

And if legal n true, why couldn't Trump use those same intel tools used against him to find further corruption supposedly done?

Because warrants are required.

a reply to: Phage

re: data collection

Really, gonna play naive?

re: laws

It's merely based on assuming the accusations that President Trump are true. His odds n claims have been on-point even before the election. Imagine his connections now. Neither of us will know till later, but, well, my odds will be on the current prez, lol.

a reply to: Neil4No1

Really, gonna play naive?

No. Gonna play paranoid?

It's merely based on assuming the accusations that President Trump are true.

Well, there's your problem right there. Why on Earth would you do that?

His odds n claims have been on-point even before the election.

You mean the birther thing. All righty then.

a reply to: Phage

That's because both sides play he-said, she-said. We can all read n act informed but in reality, we all don't know a dang thing, thanks Socrates. All we can do is assume, talk shi'ite, n wait till it's all over.

re: birther

Lame, cherry-picker. Odds HAVE been in his favor, like it or not, just reality. Now imagine his vast connections as current President.

The most expedient way to implement this immediately
would be to add The Clintons to the Russian investigation.

That way everyone The Clintons have talked to can be surveilled.

Coincidentally, a new poll out shows 52% of Americans want
the Clintons added to the "Russian" instigation.

originally posted by: Xeven
Hopefully Trump government is now survieling Obama and his cabinet due to evidence showing illegal collection and release of US intelligence.

It's only right! Anyone think Obama is wiretapped?

No hopefully they're not... Because surveillance isn't the right word, due to the fact it's the wrong act to engage in.

Investigating, is the right word, because it's the proper act to engage in; in relation to illegal activities.


Surveillance for the sake of watching someone hoping the screw up, so you can lambast them later for political gain is a terrible concept.

a reply to: CrawlingChaos

Surveillance is the word that fits Susan Rice and her
actions, if news reports are accurate.

In that sense, you are correct.

But there is more than one way to legally fry a fish.

a reply to: burntheships

Don't get me wrong, something rotten was afoot there. But, to weaponized the intelligence community and have THAT become the political norm is something I cannot, will not get behind.

Are y'all done getting logic-curbstomped by Phage yet?

a reply to: Wayfarer

Um, when did it start? Not this thread.

a reply to: Neil4No1

Keep telling yourself that. I'm chuckling at the wreckage of this thread and your responses.

a reply to: Xeven

I hope is wiretapped. I also hope his forged birth certificate is brought to light along with all those involved.

originally posted by: Xeven
Hopefully Trump government is now survieling Obama and his cabinet due to evidence showing illegal collection and release of US intelligence.

It's only right! Anyone think Obama is wiretapped?

You really DO want Trump to go to jail don't you?

originally posted by: Neil4No1
a reply to: Phage

C'mon, even you gotta admit tha whole 'wire-tapping' hooplah was legit, it's just stuck up in a mess of technical wordplay legal jargon.

Lol. No.

I really hope he isn't. Obama's people and maybe even Obama should be and hopefully are charged for unmasking U.S. Citizens caught up in surveillance without a warrant....

This has always been illegal no matter what Mrs. Rice or the Left are trying to tell everyone. Unmasking is a very large part of FISA and foreign intelligence and is a big no, no.

a reply to: GuidedKill

You should read up about how unmasking actually works as well as what Rice did to request the unmasking, because you are wrong.

a reply to: Xeven
I heard Obama is hiding in Tahiti until this whole thing blows over. It took him hours to respond to the "wiretap" claim and he still has not defended Susan Rice. Maybe his internet does not work.