It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Obama used a teleprompter but Trump shoots it straight from his mind and heart . Obama was politically correct but DT is not . I like the latter but have come to despise the former ...To.o fake for too long in my books
A speech writer would be cool though
You are too funny Benghazi . Oh and you might want to remind yourself that I make you angry at the best of times ....just sayin
Are you talking about "proof" ? You're okay with the President of the United States telling lies in front of the whole world? Some of us, aren't.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: Gryphon66
His aids and advisers lost control of him in my opinion. He's basically running a muck through the Whitehouse. I've never, in my years of following politics, seen anything like this. It's unprecedented... and we're not even at the 100 day mark.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: xuenchen
It's there, it's classified, so we should just take his word like good little girls and boys?
No.
Don't take anybody's word.
You're saying that, yet you're telling us to take his word on the excuse the evidence is 'classified'?
So whenever Trump makes up a claim, we should just assume he's telling the truth because he probably has evidence and it's probably classified.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Schiff responed on Twitter that he didn't understood what he was shown.
Trump can show us the evidence.
Where is it?
It's there.
It's classified.
Trump can declassify anything in an instant.
Next excuse?
Do you want a civil war because that's how you start one. People will go balistic if they hear the truth. Just look at all the bs protests for minor or insane reasons.
I have more faith in Americans than you seem to. Americans have a constitutional right to protest; sorry you don't agree with that.
No.
Don't take anybody's word.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Schiff responed on Twitter that he didn't understood what he was shown.
Trump can show us the evidence.
Where is it?
It's there.
It's classified.
Trump can declassify anything in an instant.
Next excuse?
Do you want a civil war because that's how you start one. People will go balistic if they hear the truth. Just look at all the bs protests for minor or insane reasons.
I have more faith in Americans than you seem to. Americans have a constitutional right to protest; sorry you don't agree with that.
Well you destroyed that faith when the american people threw one temper tantrum after another because of laws that existed and are enforced worldwide since forever without people ever complaining about it. Weill i have faith in the people that voted Trump into office but i hope the rest will come around after this whole false narrative about russia got picked apart.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: xuenchen
No.
Don't take anybody's word.
No. We should take Donald Trump's word because in your mind he has the evidence and it's classified.
We should trust him. That's what you're saying. Otherwise you wouldn't have come out with the excuse that his no show of evidence is due to it being classified.
If we shouldn't take his word or anybody's then you wouldn't of made that excuse, no?
originally posted by: carewemust
Teump is a perfectionist at triggering the right people. A maestro!
originally posted by: carewemust
Teump is a perfectionist at triggering the right people. A maestro!
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
But what is there to investigate? The FBI and Justice Department confirmed nothing. His own administration had to apologize to the British for the claim they were used to spy on him. I mean Trump made this accusation so surely he had the evidence before he decided to open his mouth right?
Outside it may be April Fools' Day, but inside my heart there are two new angry Donald Trump tweets.
On Saturday morning, the president insisted he wasn't going to be fooled by, um, the fake media.
"When will Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd and @NBCNews start talking about the Obama SURVEILLANCE SCANDAL and stop with the Fake Trump/Russia story?," he tweeted.
You know that the president really means it because "SURVEILLANCE SCANDAL" was in capital letters.
A second tweet was coming right up: "It is the same Fake News Media that said there is 'no path to victory for Trump' that is now pushing the phony Russia story. A total scam!"
www.cnet.com...
Where's his evidence? Didn't say he was going to provide proof? Where's Nunes? He clearly accused the previous administration of spying on him so where's his direct evidence? Why does he need to investigate something he already claimed as fact? He has nothing. He read this on Fox news, Breitbart whatever and decided to run with it. Now he, his administration and supporters are running around like headless chickens trying to use anything as an excuse. He has nothing so there's nothing to investigate.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: The GUT
I will be the first to admit I could be wrong as I am only human and I am a grown up.
The hacking was not an illusion in my view. Trump is tied by many threads to very bad people in Russia and elsewhere. Oligarchy monster types. He is not an innocent. But believe as you will. We may never k ow the truth. And if it comes out, we may still wrangle over it.
If proof came out that Trump was corrupt and had coordinating at a very high level with Russia to get a "win" then what would you say?
Permanent Government or no, all I see from Trump are lies.
(The new Cold War is already here, mi amigo.)
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: Wardaddy454
Well, The WH invited Schiff et al to come look at the evidence and Schiff walked out looking less than thrilled after the visit.
Oh goody, you believe Schiff looked 'less than thrilled' so this is enough proof for you? I should take your observation then as fact.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
You're saying that, yet you're telling us to take his word on the excuse the evidence is 'classified'?
So whenever Trump makes up a claim, we should just assume he's telling the truth because he probably has evidence and it's probably classified.