It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ATLANTA - Three people are in custody after a fire that caused a bridge to collapse on I-85, according to the state fire marshal's office.
Basil Eleby has been charged with first degree criminal damage to property and two others are charged with criminal trespass.
Seems to me, that something of this nature, which is going to cause nothing but problems, would qualify for some form of govt. (fed.) relief--matching funds or some such.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: seagull
Seems to me, that something of this nature, which is going to cause nothing but problems, would qualify for some form of govt. (fed.) relief--matching funds or some such.
Oh, it definitely will, as part of the US Highway system. But money isn't the holdup.
The contracts will be handled through the state. The state has a very short list of contractors that it uses, typically because someone in the contracting company knows someone in the state DOT. So they get the contract. The contract is for a much longer period than is necessary, and it's very easy to get it extended. So the contractor works private jobs when they're available, and public jobs when not. A six month job gets spread out over 2 years, with the contractor pushing private deadlines (that usually won't be extended) for three fourths of that time.
I drove a dumpy truck for the local DOT contractor for a while after I came off the road... the corruption and cooperation between contractor and DOT is massive.
TheRedneck
What was the justification for hiring the mexican crew? Cheaper wages, no benefits?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Groot
Don't get me started...
They laid off an entire asphalt crew that had been there 15 years to hire a Mexican crew... couldn't speak English, kept breaking the equipment, would motion a driver into a power line if he wasn't looking, and laid down such rough asphalt the DOT started threatening to pull contracts. No idea whatever happened over that; I decided not to drive a truck with no brakes shortly after they did that.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: flatbush71
Synopsis
1. Simple diversion while unknowns (unsubs) walked in / out strategic information, tech or virus, code etc.
2. Field test of nano technology.
3. Some future activity required the closing of I-85.
4. A total misdirection. The event caused a major realignment of strategic assets in the region. That may have been getting close to something of worth and that could not be allowed to happen.
Or any variation / combination of the above.
This was not a simple accidental arson by hobos.
But it is safe to say the general public is satisfied and other than the constant complaints about traffic congestion it will soon be forgotten.
Buck
This was not a simple accidental arson by hobos.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: seagull
Seems to me, that something of this nature, which is going to cause nothing but problems, would qualify for some form of govt. (fed.) relief--matching funds or some such.
Oh, it definitely will, as part of the US Highway system. But money isn't the holdup.
The contracts will be handled through the state. The state has a very short list of contractors that it uses, typically because someone in the contracting company knows someone in the state DOT. So they get the contract. The contract is for a much longer period than is necessary, and it's very easy to get it extended. So the contractor works private jobs when they're available, and public jobs when not. A six month job gets spread out over 2 years, with the contractor pushing private deadlines (that usually won't be extended) for three fourths of that time.
I drove a dumpy truck for the local DOT contractor for a while after I came off the road... the corruption and cooperation between contractor and DOT is massive.
TheRedneck