originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People
in that sense we should all file a protest (respectively of course) to indicate that given it seems we are about to name 110 planets?
There naming should be beyond Greek and Roman Cultures.
Just a thought.
After thinking about it, I think I was wrong about "only" Greek and Roma Deities. Planetary bodies today are named for deities from a wide range of
other mythologies beyond those of the ancient Greeks and Romans.
Some of the dwarf planets that would become planets (if the definition was to changed to include objects like Pluto) already have names that are from
other cultures' mythologies. For example, the dwarf planet
Makemake (pronounced MAH-kae MAH-kae) was a deity of the Rapu Nui of Easter Island.
The dwarf planet
Quaoar is named after the a god of the Native Americans who once inhabited parts of California.
Dwarf planet
Sedna is named for an Inuit Deity. The name of the dwarf planet
Haumea is from the Hawaiian Goddess of Fertility.
So I suppose once people developed a better understanding of past world cultures other than the Euro-centric classical Greek and Roman cultures, other
mythological deity names started becoming included on the list of potential names for the major and minor planets.
originally posted by: Kashai
I tend towards the secular argument but what is wrong with naming one Jesus and another Buddha and another Mohamed?
What about Quetzalcoatl?
I'll draw the line at NOT including names such as Jesus, Allah, or Buddha. I suppose it could be argued that "Sedna" is just as real in the minds of
certain Inuits as Jesus is in the minds of Christians. Or that Haumea is just as real in the minds of a small number of Hawaiians today as Allah is
to Muslims (BTW, not Muhammad; Muhammad is
not considered a divine being to Muslins; he was just a man. He was consider to be a great man and
revered as the greatest prophet, but a human nonetheless who is not worshipped as a divine being).
But I see a distinction (in my mind, anyway) between naming a planet after a deity who is still divine to a billion+ people worldwide (such as Jesus
and Buddha) and naming a planet after a deity who may be worshipped by a small number of native peoples who live in relatively localized groups.
Maybe in 2000 years or so, Jesus and Buddha will go the way of these other deities, and be seen as just ancient mythology. However, until then, I say
no.
Quetzalcoatl sound like a great idea, through.
By the way, maybe the list should include Australian Aboriginal mythological spirits, such as
Barraiya, who certain Australian Aboriginal
people say was the mythological spirit who created the vagina
edit on 28/3/2017 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)