Donna Brazile finally admits she forwarded town hall questions to Clinton camp

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 727Sky


She broke the law, but admitted it? There's no way she'd charged. The FBI would give her a pass for being too dumb to know what she was doing... just like they gave to Hillary.

She was reckless and careless is all.

Yep..not even worthy of a slap on the wrist. I wonder what Donna's next job will be?

She will probably help ghost-write a book for somebody.

originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yeah it is a stretch. But it sure is nice to see some of what is in the rabbit hole. I just wonder how deep it really is.

I'm not sure that Donna Brazile giving Hilary Clinton a list of predictable questions at a Town Hall meetings is particularly "down the rabbit hole."

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Snarl
This 'admission' is probably coming out to protect Wasserman Schultz, who could be expelled by the Ethics Committee, if things were played right.

Have to agree with Tarzan though ... "Left and the right take care of their own."

Yet these are the same people who will have "ethics" problems with the current admin............

Unlike the Republican Congress that tried (and failed because of public outcry) to get rid of the only Ethics watchdog on them?

Yeah, throw that stone.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 727Sky


She broke the law, but admitted it? There's no way she'd charged. The FBI would give her a pass for being too dumb to know what she was doing... just like they gave to Hillary.

She was reckless and careless is all.

Yep..not even worthy of a slap on the wrist. I wonder what Donna's next job will be?

She will probably help ghost-write a book for somebody.

Worked out for Tony Schwartz.

a reply to: Gryphon66

They weren't "predictable questions".

They were the real questions.

CNN does not "predict".

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Gryphon66

They weren't "predictable questions".

They were the real questions.

CNN does not "predict".

The questions at a "Town Hall" between Clinton and Sanders weren't predictable?

Well, that's an opinion, anyway.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You know sometimes I really don't know how to reply to some people.
For me it is the the rabbit hole for you not so much. I get it.

originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: Gryphon66

You know sometimes I really don't know how to reply to some people.
For me it is the the rabbit hole for you not so much. I get it.

Don't feel rained on. I often don't know how to respond to some things I read on here.

However, please don't misunderstand. I don't mind looking behind the curtains ... but this deal with Brazile just isn't that to me.

Different strokes, you know?

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Snarl
This 'admission' is probably coming out to protect Wasserman Schultz, who could be expelled by the Ethics Committee, if things were played right.

Have to agree with Tarzan though ... "Left and the right take care of their own."

Yet these are the same people who will have "ethics" problems with the current admin............

Speaking of ethics... the Dems are putting up Eric Holder, of all people, to lead the charge against gerrymandering. The jokes write themselves.

Democratic push to end gerrymandering, helmed by Eric Holder, to begin in Va.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 727Sky


She broke the law, but admitted it? There's no way she'd charged. The FBI would give her a pass for being too dumb to know what she was doing... just like they gave to Hillary.

She was reckless and careless is all.

Yep..not even worthy of a slap on the wrist. I wonder what Donna's next job will be?

She will probably help ghost-write a book for somebody.

Barack and Michelle are seeking input for their $65 million dollar book deal. Donna can give them a hand, for a price.

originally posted by: Konduit

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Snarl
This 'admission' is probably coming out to protect Wasserman Schultz, who could be expelled by the Ethics Committee, if things were played right.

Have to agree with Tarzan though ... "Left and the right take care of their own."

Yet these are the same people who will have "ethics" problems with the current admin............

Speaking of ethics... the Dems are putting up Eric Holder, of all people, to lead the charge against gerrymandering. The jokes write themselves.

Democratic push to end gerrymandering, helmed by Eric Holder, to begin in Va.

Why not?

The Reps have been at it since 2010: REDMAP

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 727Sky


She broke the law, but admitted it? There's no way she'd charged. The FBI would give her a pass for being too dumb to know what she was doing... just like they gave to Hillary.

She was reckless and careless is all.

Yep..not even worthy of a slap on the wrist. I wonder what Donna's next job will be?

She will probably help ghost-write a book for somebody.

Barack and Michelle are seeking input for their $65 million dollar book deal. Donna can give them a hand, for a price.

How much you figure you would get for a book deal?

With or without help.

Sour grapes aren't becoming.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: 727Sky

And this matters because...?

Its called "corruption", and it matters because we just completed an election that was a circus. Hillary rigged her side of the aisle to shoo off the parties actual candidate. she stole the primary, and then leveraged that same power structure to try to steal the election.

The breadth of the corruption is what matters. Because at some point we will need to sit down and figure out exactly what happened on that jet where Bill Clinton discussed his grandchildren with the head of the DOJ.

Bernie sanders would have a suit no?

pry too late now. Sanders has been compromised. Was just a Dennis Kucinich poser.

I think anyone inside the party has a lawsuit.

a reply to: GraffikPleasure

Why does it matter?.... Wow...

Lying to the American public and helping Hillary cheat in the election process? Yup, right nothing to see here, just democrat process at work.

Donald Trump has brought lying to the American public to new heights. Shouldn't you be focusing your energies there, instead of fighting the last battle?

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

We will also need to figure out what all of Trump's advisers were talking about with the organization formerly know as the KGB.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

We will also need to figure out what all of Trump's advisers were talking about with the organization formerly know as the KGB.

There's no proof of anything anywhere.

a reply to: DJW001

what if the only difference now is that everyone is and has to ability to keep the score regarding the truth?

All sources, from Trump to the NYT to CNN to Politifact to Infowars have all went to the same level of credibility.

We also need to investigate the Russian Bank and Podesta group connections. Once it is discovered that the podesta group was lobbying to remove Russian sanctions it must be concluded that the whole Russian story is fake news.

You cant cry muh Russia while HRC's right hand man ran a group which was lobbying to remove sanctions. The same sanctions they are crying trump may remove bc "connections". Do you know how stupid that sounds?

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

We will also need to figure out what all of Trump's advisers were talking about with the organization formerly know as the KGB.

There's no proof of anything anywhere.

Yet.

I withdraw the questions.