It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Julie Washington
O+
- Blue, Green or Hazel Eyes green
- More Physically and Emotionally aware nope
- Red hair no hair
- Sensitive to heat always too cold
- Higher IQ hahahahaha, nope
- Lower body temperature nope
- Dreams of or actual Alien abductions nope
And yet, I am an alien.
Technically a sex machine would be considered a cyborg.
originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: Julie Washington
As I have explained in several OP’s, there is NO rhesus monkey gene in humans. Sheeeeeesh!
The widely used term "Rh" was kept for the clinically described human antibodies that are different from the ones related to the rhesus macaque monkey. The discovery was produced by immunizing rabbits with red blood cells from a rhesus monkey, NOT a HUMAN. The agglutinin factor found in rhesus macaque was classified in the Landsteiner-Wiener antigen system. The propensity for the Rh factor was just one in a system of various antigens (it consists of 50 defined blood-group antigens, among which the five antigens D, C, c, E, and e ). Based on different models of genetic inheritance, two different terminologies were developed; both of them are still in use.
An international consortium of scientists including Penn State researchers analyzed the draft genome sequence of the rhesus macaque monkey, the second nonhuman primate, after the chimpanzee, to have its genome sequenced. The rhesus genome shares about 93 percent of its sequence with both the human and the chimpanzee genome. As the most distant of the three species, the rhesus provides an ideal reference point for comparisons among the three closely related primates. The study appeared recently in the journal Science, together with four companion papers that also relied on the genome sequence.
originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: Julie Washington
Let's turn the perspective around instead of asking if that type is alien derived because in response to that question, we can honestly say we don't know. And even those that study the genetics of our DNA don't want to hint or say that claim an alien component component even if it can be the case within what they like to call our "junk."
But if we wonder why reports of from people being abducted tend to have that blood type, then that tends to suggest the ETs are interested in and zero in on that type for some reason. Why is that? Are they making some efforts to link up to old blood relatives? Are the genetics of that type more prone to higher states of consciousness that the ETs can "tune into?" --
You could say this is another one of those "which came first, the chicken or the egg" puzzles. But as for me, an abductee with the traits mentioned fully recognized before anybody did a field study of the associations, I think I know the answer.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: St Udio
scientific Adam.