New Michael Brown Documentary Says Video Proves Cops Are Lying!

originally posted by: Bone75


I also think it's mighty irresponsible of CNN to keep plastering Darren Wilson's face on the television. Even the DOJ concluded that the physical evidence and CREDIBLE witness testimony supported the officer's version of events.

The policeman could have got away at any time. He was in his car his engine was running. There was no need to carry on without help.
It's pretty clear why the police just released the first tape, without going into earlier events. As for court cases, so often the air is blue with lies from both offenders and police, that's the way it works, and that's what juries are left to deal with.

The only people who didnt know about the other video had already made their minds up and only listen to the "news"... the easily manipulated think its some sort of relevant release of a secret video. So he deals drugs and robs is local community store.. it validates any of these idiot arguments that claim he was a nice boy.. just a wonderful citizen?? It okays the rabid protesters last night.. and the shootings among the protesters?? I live close to the area.. its getting old hearing the BS and seeing the BS happening. They.. the so called protesters.. HATE their community and REFUSE to police themselves... or their kids.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Good source! SMH. Not even close. Are you upset that once again the truth has come out and all you can do is scream fake news and that it was edited? If it were edited to shine him in a different light why wasn't the marijuana hand off edited?

a reply to: Stevenjames15

Good source! SMH. Not even close. Are you upset that once again the truth has come out and all you can do is scream fake news and that it was edited? If it were edited to shine him in a different light why wasn't the marijuana hand off edited?

well the article says it was. if there was nothing to hide why not show the whole thing?

from the OP's link emphasis mine,

The video Pollock obtained, which was edited for the documentary, challenges the narrative police had long maintained:

editing means that the video has been tampered with, cut, changed to show something favorable for/ to the one that edited it. not a true copy. again if there was nothing to hide on browns side why edit it?

i'm thinking, and there is good reason to think this, is that somebody is out to make a payday off this documentary.
if people will think back, there was a fight amongst the family members about selling big mike t shirts. in which the family members called of all people, the furguson police to break it up. can anyone say ironic.

NOVEMBER 6--A police report detailing a fight last month between members of Michael Brown’s family over the sale of commemorative t-shirts identifies the late teenager’s mother as one of the “attackers” who beat and robbed vendors selling the merchandise from a tent in a Ferguson, Missouri parking lot.
Michael Brown's Mother Named As Robbery Attacker

it would also seem that attacking people and robbing them runs in the family.

LOL, they just proved he was a drug dealer on top of everything else.

How does this make him less guilty?

BLM is based on fake news around a thug who is now a proven drug dealer who committed assault and robbery, then attacked the police.

He lived a dangerous life no different than someone who for instance, rock climbs without a rope during thunder storms. The inevitable happened directly from his actions.

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Speaking of his mother....

This tribute blanket his mom has behind her is creepy as f-!!!




ETA: Or I assume it's a blanket. Whatever it is, it freaks me out.

originally posted by: kngfc
a reply to: Spider879

How that community was being "ran"? Who "runs" a community?

People living inside of a community are responsible for what happens inside of it.

Oh but I see. Everyone's a victim right?

This isn't about police or race.

It's about the self-deprivation of a culture.

Since we are gonna accept the gov't report on what happened in Ferguson lets go all in and accept this finding also

Ferguson policies targeted blacks, created toxic environment: U.S. attorney general

Some police would compete to see who could issue the most citations to African-Americans, he said. Often the charges were trumped up, or fictitious. Police and city officials laced their emails with racist jokes, Holder added. The city also looked to double its revenue in fines collected by the courts to a projected $3 million for its 2015 fiscal year, from over $1.3 million in 2010, he said. "Ferguson police officers issued nearly 50 percent more citations in the last year than they did in 2010 – an increase that has not been driven, or even accompanied, by a rise in crime," Holder said.
www.reuters.com...

So yes this got dick to do with so called culture as you put it but ppl who ran that community.

a reply to: Spider879

has nothing to do with brown, mike attacked the cop. plain and simple.

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Spider879

has nothing to do with brown, mike attacked the cop. plain and simple.

Look you can choose to believe that , and I am not here to try the case, the DOJ said nothing here to see so that's that, my issue is with the police and their release of a vid footage that had dick to do with the incident, the reason?? to highlite his thuggishness , all the while had footage of an earlier vid which could have put the one released in context, some folks above me are saying this vid was out there..well it sure as fk didn't reach mass media, also folks are claiming he was no angle , true but I wonder how many here truly are and didn't act the ass in their youth.

The person that I responded to bought up the issue of culture hence my reply.

a reply to: Spider879

my issue is with the police and their release of a vid footage that had dick to do with the incident, the reason??

"had dick to do with it"? your just grasping now. it showed that he was one of the two that the description was put out on.
it also showed that brown was no stranger in the use of violence to get his way.

keep on pretending it " had dick to so with it".

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Spider879

my issue is with the police and their release of a vid footage that had dick to do with the incident, the reason??

"had dick to do with it"? your just grasping now. it showed that he was one of the two that the description was put out on.
it also showed that brown was no stranger in the use of violence to get his way.

keep on pretending it " had dick to so with it".

No Iam not, Mike wasn't stopped because someone called that he robbed a store or sold drugs, he was stopped for walking in the street, what happened after..the DOJ issued it's report, the head cop released that footage that had nothing to do with the incident , others who are hostile to my replies admitted as much.

a reply to: Spider879

, he was stopped for walking in the street,

yes and told to get out of the street then wilson started driving away. it was when he was driving away that the call went out about the store robbery, wilson recognized brown and his buddy and backed up. don't leave that out.




ETA: everybody that reads my post when i use wiki know i always say this, cause it's fast.

Security camera footage, from shortly before the shooting, recorded Brown stealing several packages of cigarillos from a nearby convenience store and assaulting the store clerk who tried to stop him, according to the Department of Justice examination. Brown was accompanied by his friend Dorian Johnson.[2] Wilson had been notified by police dispatch of the reported robbery and descriptions of the two suspects. He encountered Brown and Johnson as they were walking down the middle of the street. Wilson said that he realized that the two men matched the robbery suspects' descriptions.[3][4] Wilson backed up his cruiser and blocked them.
Shooting of Michael Brown

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Spider879

, he was stopped for walking in the street,

yes and told to get out of the street then wilson started driving away. it was when he was driving away that the call went out about the store robbery, wilson recognized brown and his buddy and backed up. don't leave that out.

That's all well and good, but like I told you I am not trying the case, I am talking about the use of a vid footage that had No-thing to do with the case, the reason being is to smear him, again not saying he was an angle, but if LEO is going out of their way to smear the dead, then I can have no trust in them, and in this I am not alone.

originally posted by: Spider879

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Spider879

, he was stopped for walking in the street,

yes and told to get out of the street then wilson started driving away. it was when he was driving away that the call went out about the store robbery, wilson recognized brown and his buddy and backed up. don't leave that out.

That's all well and good, but like I told you I am not trying the case, I am talking about the use of a vid footage that had No-thing to do with the case, the reason being is to smear him, again not saying he was an angle, but if LEO is going out of their way to smear the dead, then I can have no trust in them, and in this I am not alone.

You should be mistrusting the media..

a reply to: Spider879

you might be now, but from your OP you were trying the case over again. you changed up. and went to a different angle

Lying by omission, now I am wondering if those of you after being such shill for police shooting if this new footage shown after two fking yrs too late have a change of mind about what really went down and the events leading up to that young man's death.

originally posted by: Advantage

originally posted by: Spider879

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Spider879

, he was stopped for walking in the street,

yes and told to get out of the street then wilson started driving away. it was when he was driving away that the call went out about the store robbery, wilson recognized brown and his buddy and backed up. don't leave that out.

That's all well and good, but like I told you I am not trying the case, I am talking about the use of a vid footage that had No-thing to do with the case, the reason being is to smear him, again not saying he was an angle, but if LEO is going out of their way to smear the dead, then I can have no trust in them, and in this I am not alone.

You should be mistrusting the media..

Don't trust them much either.

originally posted by: Spider879

originally posted by: Advantage

originally posted by: Spider879

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Spider879

, he was stopped for walking in the street,

yes and told to get out of the street then wilson started driving away. it was when he was driving away that the call went out about the store robbery, wilson recognized brown and his buddy and backed up. don't leave that out.

That's all well and good, but like I told you I am not trying the case, I am talking about the use of a vid footage that had No-thing to do with the case, the reason being is to smear him, again not saying he was an angle, but if LEO is going out of their way to smear the dead, then I can have no trust in them, and in this I am not alone.

You should be mistrusting the media..

Don't trust them much either.

I like you Spider.. I dont always agree, but I genuinely like you. I swear to you, the media made this issue what it is mostly. The vid was never secret. His background was free to know if one wanted to know it. I live near Ferguson, its a craphole of crime. Most of the citizenry dont give a damn to do anything for themselves or anyone else. They were whipped EASILY into violent destructive riots. Not for Brown, he was an excuse. Its because they are who they allowed the local media and the protest organizers to use them. Even last night.. shootings in a "peaceful" protest. The minority who want something else... they dont have a voice because the majority are those of the same mindset of those "protesters".

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Spider879

you might be now, but from your OP you were trying the case over again. you changed up. and went to a different angle

Lying by omission, now I am wondering if those of you after being such shill for police shooting if this new footage shown after two fking yrs too late have a change of mind about what really went down and the events leading up to that young man's death.

How so, I haven't changed up anything, didn't mentioned guilt or supposed innocence of either Mike or Darren , even in bold red it's about the damned vid.

a reply to: Spider879

please, it obvious.

ok just for the sake of arguing

Lying by omission

what does this mean if your not saying the reason for the stop was a lie? hence retrying the case.

two fking yrs too late have a change of mind about what really went down and the events leading up to that young man's death.

and this seems to be stating that a drug deal gone wrong, or put off was the reason that he took the cigarillos and that the cops choose to ignore it, hence retrying the case.

then this post,

that Mike Brown was just some thoughtless thug no context as to the earlier vid.

the earlier part of the video had nothing to do with brown attacking the cop after he backed up to stop him. the video they released as i said earlier showed that yes brown and johnson were indeed the two, and that yes he( brown) was prone to violence. he choose to become violent twice in a short span of time. that's the context open your eyes.
it wasn't until you started getting spanked and you realized that your OP was in trouble, that you went the DOJ route and police corruption.