It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: DayAfterTomorrow
Your link is a new age blog post you cherry-picked to suit your opinion?
Ah well, looks like all the etymological experts are all wrong.
/sarc
originally posted by: DayAfterTomorrow
DNA is the same sequencing of letters on a grander scale
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: DayAfterTomorrow
DNA is the same sequencing of letters on a grander scale
DNA is not letters. It's a sequence of purines and pyrimidines arranged on a sugar-phosphate carrier.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: DayAfterTomorrow
Funny how your own logic only applies when you want it to.
originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: DayAfterTomorrow
DNA isn't digital, either. It's a chemical encoding method for storing cellular information.
I think you're going way overboard trying to say DNA is somehow co-identical with Judeo-Christian literature because they're both encoded with some sort of symbols, even though the symbology used is radically different in form and content. It's sort of like saying some cars are made of sky because they are both blue.
originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: DayAfterTomorrow
Digital information, no. I don't think you understand the concept of logos. And I know you don't have a grasp on holography. Not everything is coidentical.
But DNA and the KJV share less commonality by far than the KJV and, say, the Communist Manifesto, or the Quran
originally posted by: DayAfterTomorrow
DNA is a shadow of the process.