Someday we will learn why Obama did this.

Those were the words of Andrew Napolitano, a former superior court judge.

Here is what he was referring to:

On Jan. 3, outgoing Attorney General Loretta Lynch secretly signed an order directing the National Security Agency -- America’s 60,000-person-strong domestic spying apparatus -- to make available raw spying data to all other federal intelligence agencies, which then can pass it on to their counterparts in foreign countries and in the 50 states upon request. She did so, she claimed, for administrative convenience. Yet in doing this, she violated basic constitutional principles that were erected centuries ago to prevent just what she did.

Something went legally wrong in Obama's administration after the election. Hillary's loss sent the administration into cya mode. "Houston, we have a problem!" #draintheswamp

What in the hell were they up to? What in the hell were they trying to cover up? What doors were they trying to keep open to them after our election?

Andrew Napolitano: Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a parting shot at personal freedom

a reply to: queenofswords


If this is true she should be arrested as soon as can be arranged.

a reply to: queenofswords

They were insuring the dirt on trump and the Russians wasn't flushed by the incoming admin who had lots to lose by the info.

Come on you know this.

a reply to: queenofswords

Yet in doing this, she violated basic constitutional principles that were erected centuries ago to prevent just what she did.

I'd like to know which "Constitutional Principles" Loretta Lynch officially violated by doing this. I'm not doubting what she did at all, just hoping to get a little more detail before delving deeper into this

Clearly more evidence of the outgoing Administration's Operation Gladio tactics

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: queenofswords

They were insuring the dirt on trump and the Russians wasn't flushed by the incoming admin who had lots to lose by the info.

That's their bulls**t story. Not buying it for a second.

And Andrew Napolitano? The guy of "FBI insiders say they are ready to indict Hillary Clinton" fame judge Napolitano?? The guy who claimed all last spring that Hillary was going to jail? That guy? The one who claimed his close friends inside the bureau assured him that was true? Him?

a reply to: FamCore

The article sheds some light on that. It would be worth delving into a little deeper.

a reply to: Sillyolme

There is no evidence on Trump, otherwise they would have used it.

You know this as they all cry daily how they lost.

To add: they are not done with Hillary yet, you will see.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: queenofswords

Yet in doing this, she violated basic constitutional principles that were erected centuries ago to prevent just what she did.

I'd like to know which "Constitutional Principles" Loretta Lynch officially violated by doing this. I'm not doubting what she did at all, just hoping to get a little more detail before delving deeper into this

Well the FBI New York wasn't permitted to read emails related to Hilary Clinton's private server contained on Anthony's Weiner's laptop as their investigation was isolated to Weiner's Weiner. Legal reasons to one's right to privacy.

What happens when you get investigated for something you may or may not have done and now everything about you is shared with every agency domestic and foreign. Now imagine they'd like you to do something you'd otherwise be disinclined to do and the present this folder of you to you.

Trump could tell you people the moon is made of green cheese and you’d believe it.

He knows he can reLIE on you

If she did it secretly how come we know about it, listen up people everything is beyond fake now, its all an illusion. Obama loves Trump, Trump loves Hillary Hillary loves Putin.

That is what is eating the democrats that now all their dirt is coming out to the surface.

On top of that we have the claims of Trump been wiretapped, this going to get very uncomfortable for those involved.

Politics are dirty we all know that, but for some reason they have turned violently rabid with Trump in the white house.l

a reply to: burntheships

Hell occurs is not, when you have one of the committee on the Russian affair member coming forward on national TV and asking if anybody knows something about Russia and Trump to talk.

What that tells you, is all BS they have nothing, but the Democrats keep digging and don't want to let go.

originally posted by: Willtell
Trump could tell you people the moon is made of green cheese and you’d believe it.

He knows he can reLIE you

You already believe that yourself, so he doesn't need to tell you.

The recent USA Freedom Act permits the NSA to ask the FISA court for a search warrant for any person -- named or unnamed -- based on the standard of “governmental need.”

________

Now, because of the Lynch secret order, revealed by The New York Times late last week, the NSA may share any of its data with any other intelligence agency or law enforcement agency that has an intelligence arm based on -- you guessed it -- the non-standard of governmental need.

So President Barack Obama, in the death throes of his time in the White House, has delivered perhaps his harshest blow to constitutional freedom by permitting his attorney general to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, thereby enabling people in law enforcement to get whatever they want about whomever they wish without a showing of probable cause of crime as the Fourth Amendment requires. That amendment expressly forbids the use of general warrants -- search where you wish and seize what you find -- and they had never been a lawful tool of law enforcement until Lynch's order.

I ask again....Jan. 2017 ???!!! What in the hell were they up to?

originally posted by: Willtell
Trump could tell you people the moon is made of green cheese and you’d believe it.

He knows he can reLIE you

But he wouldn't, because he isn't a silly person like Obama is.
Obama cuts the cheese and blames it on wind. Go figure

I want to know why a SITTING president turned the ic community on the incoming president.
This is FAR worse than watergate.
Obama mapy turn out to be FAR worse than PUTIN.

IT IS NOT OK TO SPY ON US CITIZENS