Oceanus Procellarum (Ocean of Storms) Alien Base or Elite Holiday Camp?

a reply to: lunarrover

From your grainy image, which shapes are those? My jelly brain is having a hard time seeing what you claim to see, when I look at TV's images or OneBigMonkeyToo's render.

Yours don't compare. Theirs show, or more to the point, do NOT show, what you claim to see in yours.

Please explain this incongruity between the image you provided, and theirs.

Please help me to cognitively identify basic geometric shapes in an astounding way.

Oh - and if you want to insult peoples' intelligence, you may want to start using a spell checker. Your spelling, for an RAF man of 15 years, is appalling.

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: lunarrover

From your grainy image, which shapes are those? My jelly brain is having a hard time seeing what you claim to see, when I look at TV's images or OneBigMonkeyToo's render.

Yours don't compare. Theirs show, or more to the point, do NOT show, what you claim to see in yours.

Please explain this incongruity between the image you provided, and theirs.

Please help me to cognitively identify basic geometric shapes in an astounding way.

Oh - and if you want to insult peoples' intelligence, you may want to start using a spell checker. Your sp
elling, for an RAF man of 15 years, is appalling.

I wasnt saying you were a jelly brain. But the images do make thick people jump up and down a lot lol like angry chimps.

No matter what I post you are hell bent on playing the forum game which is ok cos this is a forum lol. No point bringing anything here because this place isnt the right place for it I doubt it would be welcome anywhere in reality. Its a bit purile and dumb to continue. Infact I probably make myself look bad trying to defend any of the images I posted and wont bother as it is a bit too much hard work for a return of 0. as I said before some people like the stuff I have done and some dont.

I would not expect anything different really if honest. You cant post that sort of stuff without uproar ensuing in some format or tother.

At least I'm not a Flat Nut :lol

originally posted by: lunarrover
At least I'm not a Flat Nut :lol

Ok.. I'll give you that

originally posted by: lunarrover

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: lunarrover

Can you share something that doesn't look like craters and/or 'domes'?

Yeah, heres a lunar thingamy jig, I think one of them is doing some welding?

wow. OK nevermind..

a reply to: lunarrover

I worked in photo recon for the RAF for 15 years

the peasoup uh i mean plot thickens

a reply to: lunarrover

thats just some glare on the photo wtf dude?

a reply to: lunarrover

no ego?
you just posted that you worked on RAF recon

a reply to: lunarrover

this one could be an authentic ufo but one true claim doesnt validate all the false ones!

a reply to: lunarrover

wow! thats very true!

a reply to: humanoidlord

Any semblence of credibility died with your idiotic theory about lowering brightness manifests millions of years in the making alien anomalies.

a reply to: lunarrover

when you lower the brightness you are tampering with the picture where yiu like it or not

OP, your photos are sadly full of nothing. The moon is the moon.. there are not castles or alien bases or anything else. It's rock.. dust.. craters.. not much else. Hi def images pretty much destroy every attempt at trying to claim there are all sorts of "bases" on the moon. I applaud your effort, but not your results.

NASA is not trying to "cover up" anything. If there were photos that had anything anomalous in them, do you honestly think they would Photoshop those so they could then display them to the public? Of course not.. they simply would never see the light of day. I think it's honestly hilarious people think NASA would think it's a better idea to heavily edit a single photo and then publish it, than just to not publish it, if there is something there they don't want the public to see. Out of thousands of photos.. let's heavily Photoshop a few to hide alien bases! Or.. maybe it's your imagination and wishful thinking. : )

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: lunarrover

when you lower the brightness you are tampering with the picture where yiu like it or not

I know that but someone has done a job on you pal.

Dont take my word for anything, be honest to yourself. Try going and getting and doing then seeing becomes believing.

Its real. Nothing I do or say should be able to convince you and rightly so. Just go and take a look for yourself.

originally posted by: fleabit
OP, your photos are sadly full of nothing. The moon is the moon.. there are not castles or alien bases or anything else. It's rock.. dust.. craters.. not much else. Hi def images pretty much destroy every attempt at trying to claim there are all sorts of "bases" on the moon. I applaud your effort, but not your results.

NASA is not trying to "cover up" anything. If there were photos that had anything anomalous in them, do you honestly think they would Photoshop those so they could then display them to the public? Of course not.. they simply would never see the light of day. I think it's honestly hilarious people think NASA would think it's a better idea to heavily edit a single photo and then publish it, than just to not publish it, if there is something there they don't want the public to see. Out of thousands of photos.. let's heavily Photoshop a few to hide alien bases! Or.. maybe it's your imagination and wishful thinking. : )

If that is what you choose to believe fine, I'm not here to change peoples religeons. I though it was time I posted what I believe is the truth.

Edit to say, we can now remove the veil of secracy spawned from a 1960's photo lab and may be strip away one of truths protective layers.

Lol.....the OP ISN'T a Brit.....isn't serious and isn't here to make you BELIEVE anything.....he/she is here to make you DISBELIEVE.

a reply to: KeithCooper

Wrong.

a reply to: fleabit

said it better than me

a reply to: lunarrover

then shown proof you worked on RAF

a reply to: humanoidlord

With all due respect I really dont want to be identified.

I worked in photo labs as a tech, both onbase and portable at remote locations. A lot of the time I spent working with mundane faces of recruits or developing pictures of bent up metal from accidents. We did use chemical baths but as time went on it started moving into digital but i got out 18 years ago. The more interesting work came with bringing out detail within the digital domain. I run a small cleaning business now, it's not great but pays the bills.

Now the dust has settled what are peoples thoughts on this?