It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The information was compiled and processed by scientists and technicians at the University of Maryland and Google Earth. It used Landsat imagery from 2000 to 2012 to study how forest cover has changed globally. Lee used that information to look at Alberta, where previous studies had already found the most industrially affected forests in Canada. He found that in those 12 years, the eastern slopes of the Rockies lost 6.8 per cent of their forests that weren't in a protected area. That outpaced the rate of deforestation in the oilsands region, which came in at 5.5 per cent. The Canadian average was 3.1 per cent. Brazil's average was 4.3 per cent, the U.S. was 2.9 per cent and Russia came in at 2.2 per cent.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: D8Tee
23% of Alberta's land has been earmarked or converted into oil sands territory.
Half of my family works in the oil sands or natural gas sector of Alberta and have confirmed this as being the case. The deforestation is ongoing.
It probably won't amount to 1/4 of total forest land being converted mind you, so yes that's exaggerated.
~Tenth
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: D8Tee
The total area of tar sands deposits sits at 141,000 km2.
So by my calculations that's about 21%.
OH I see what you're getting at now. ( i just read your link)
Nevermind.
I thought we were just discussing the total amounts.
~Tenth
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: D8Tee
It would be great if your thread showed irrefutable proof that his statement was wrong, but... sigh... instead this thread looks more like a rant.
originally posted by: freedomSlave
I live in Alberta this statement is utter b.s. lol 1/4 of Alberta .