The Anomalous Moon

originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: lunarrover

Interesting that the enhanced images were the ones most heavily blurred originally, and also the ones with the most familiar-looking structures. Don't you think?

That is pretty much what drives me, when I find a heavily blurred and overexposed image it fuels my curiosity and makes me think what is this image hiding?

a reply to: lunarrover

I asked you what you think they are...of course you couldn't know. And you should definitely not leave it alone. There are plenty of things that are kept from us...only a fool would believe they tell us everything that is up there beyond our ability to see. But I am trying to engage you on your topic here...spark an actual discussion.

My point was that when people are inundated with too much visual information, their ability to see anything hidden within in is greatly diminished and they will either become frustrated or impatient or both. Either way, they will lose interest in the topic and the opportunity for discussion is history.

Perhaps you might consider choosing a few images...like the amazing one a few posts up, marking the areas where the anomalies are and doing a new thread discussing only those images and what they might reveal. Then, choose another batch of images and make a new thread for those, and so on. That way, you get your info out there without losing your audience to thread drift and overwhelming them with too much visual stimuli...you know how when you look at the same word for too long, you start to feel like it isn't spelled right or something and after a while it starts to look completely alien, like gibberish? It's like that.

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: lunarrover



A lot of folks simply refuse to acknowledge anything beyond what society and the status quo have conditioned them to acknowledge. The eyes will see but the brain will filter it out. Mental censoring takes place quite commonly here with these topics. No amount of convincing by others will change it.

On the other hand, as a yoot, I was reading a book about pictures of the Moon, and the text advised me to rotate the picture 180 degrees, and all the craters would suddenly look like domes. They did.

The point being made was, it's easy for your eyes to see craters as domes, the cues that cause this are subtle, and you have to look with better eyes if you're doing photoanalysis.

You make a very valid point here about how our eyes can process visual information. However, it is important to remember that the reverse is also true. What if we've always thought we were looking at craters when in truth, we we looking at domes all the time?

a reply to: tigertatzen

I wont post anymore pictures. I think I have posted enough now

It would be nice to be microscopic on each image for you but the danger with that would be trickle feeding the audience which is time consuming. I just wanted to raise awareness really. I know it isnt great but it is what it is.

Feel free to do what thou wilt with them.

You're going about this the wrong way here at ATS.

ATS is a discussion site. It's not a blog or a place to post pictures (like flickr, photobucket, etc).

Take one or two pictures, make a thread about them, show the areas that you think are something, explain why you think there is something there, explain what you did to the pictures to show what is there. In otherwords: Open it up for discussion.

There are very many threads that have done this already here on ATS using the Moon, Mars, and other things right here on Earth.

Making a thread that you flood with a huge amount of images is not a discussion thread, and people here will loose interest. They are here to discuss things, not just look at a bunch of pictures you've manipulated with a photoshop program. Threads like that (flooded with a lot of different pictures) tend to die as people loose interest because there is no discussion going on.

If your only goal was to simply plaster a bunch of pictures here, you're in the wrong place. If you just wanted to post pictures and say "I'm right and everyone else is wrong" again, you are in the wrong place. This is ATS.....not GPL.

So, are you here for discussion? Or are you here to push your images and YouTube channel?

Naw......this thread is fabulous.......I see the details plain as day......Aristarchus has a helluva tower or impact tower in the mid of it yup and the dishs with shadow and under structures of normality

Love the pics.....

a reply to: eriktheawful

I'm here to Deny Ignorance.

I do want to talk about all of this stuff and more, I do not have a hidden agenda of anykind. The last thing I want to do is annoy people. Sorry I got it so wrong. I'm not here to say I am right and everyone else is wrong or push my youtube as I cant see any bennefit in doing that. I just got a bit camrried away.

Note to self: Must try harder.

Note to yourself....you're absolutely right down the middle perfectly presenting the case in all aspects of decorum


Great reply to: lunarrover

a reply to: lunarrover

could you circle the domes so i can see?

a reply to: lunarrover

babies? wtf? what mad you think that?

a reply to: lunarrover

cant see crap

a reply to: lunarrover

some symetry here but could be pareidolia

a reply to: lunarrover

under odd lighting every crater looks like a dome

a reply to: lunarrover

arrows needed

a reply to: lunarrover

that odd structure in the bottom looks odd but again nothing conclusive

a reply to: lunarrover

nothing

a reply to: lunarrover

arrows pls

a reply to: lunarrover

craters

a reply to: lunarrover

that odd thing is a very famous lunar crater that probaly formed after an horizontal impact

a reply to: lunarrover

yet again nothing