It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: incepticus
Federal law "trumps" both, heh.
We are a comfy corporatocracy.
With so many people, they sound like great places to send large teams of federal agents if you want to imprison or deport individuals breaking federal laws.
Ultimately, federal laws trump state laws, so each of these agencies has something to hold over the heads of local authorities, but in the end, each of these agencies ultimately relies on individually negotiated agreements with local authorities to be able to operate.
For this reason, local sheriffs can, if they so decide, choose not to participate in a given action. Indeed, in many anti-immigrant states, the problem is often the reverse - local authorities are demanding the right to enforce federal laws, and at least if the case of Alabama and Arizona is considered, they aren't allowed to. The Arizona v. United States decision aka "Show Me Your Papers" was the result of state authorities attempting to enforce a federal law. Most of it was struck down, because it was too much of an entaglement between the different types of government.
The converse also holds. If DEA wants to raid a Colorado "dispensary," they have to supply the agents to do it. Colorado cannot legally bar the DEA agents from doing their job, but they are under no obligation to enforce it either.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I don't want to derail the thread but it's funny what the Administration thinks should be States rights to determine and what shouldn't be. These turds need to be flushed.
This was my first thought when I started reading this thread - I thought Trump was a big States Rights guy! Why is it that, in his opinion, states should determine their own laws in regards to abortion and gay rights, but yet the Feds are going to stick their noses in on their own laws in regards to legal weed... and don't forget, the people of these states actually voted in favor of it. It wasn't chosen by legislators or judges, but the people themselves!
originally posted by: underwerks
If Trump goes through with this, over 100,000 people stand to lose their jobs and be made into criminals overnight.
This is called progress in Trumps America.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I don't want to derail the thread but it's funny what the Administration thinks should be States rights to determine and what shouldn't be. These turds need to be flushed.
This was my first thought when I started reading this thread - I thought Trump was a big States Rights guy! Why is it that, in his opinion, states should determine their own laws in regards to abortion and gay rights, but yet the Feds are going to stick their noses in on their own laws in regards to legal weed... and don't forget, the people of these states actually voted in favor of it. It wasn't chosen by legislators or judges, but the people themselves!
It will be a HUGE hypocrisy, and one that I'm sure the anti-Trump crowd will not let go easily. The legal weed industry is also a big jobs creator. Another thing that Trump was pretty big about.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You're talking about weed. It's not a war, it's not an assault. This is the type of # Piers Morgan said the liberals need to stop with. Turning everything Trump says into armageddon. Stop being so melodramatic.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
How can you come out as a champion on States' rights for Trans rights but demand federal enforcement for marijuana?
“If that’s something that’s not desired any longer Congress should pass a law to change the rule. It is not the Attorney General’s job to decide what laws to enforce.”
So who should we fight?
The people that make the laws?
Or the guy who has the job of upholding the laws?
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You're talking about weed. It's not a war, it's not an assault. This is the type of # Piers Morgan said the liberals need to stop with. Turning everything Trump says into armageddon. Stop being so melodramatic.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I don't want to derail the thread but it's funny what the Administration thinks should be States rights to determine and what shouldn't be. These turds need to be flushed.
This was my first thought when I started reading this thread - I thought Trump was a big States Rights guy! Why is it that, in his opinion, states should determine their own laws in regards to abortion and gay rights, but yet the Feds are going to stick their noses in on their own laws in regards to legal weed... and don't forget, the people of these states actually voted in favor of it. It wasn't chosen by legislators or judges, but the people themselves!
It will be a HUGE hypocrisy, and one that I'm sure the anti-Trump crowd will not let go easily. The legal weed industry is also a big jobs creator. Another thing that Trump was pretty big about.
I was under the impression Trump was favorable towards legal weed. I was thinking that if it was ever going to be legal on a nationwide scale, he would be the president to make it happen. To hear Sessions come out like this is doing a 180!
originally posted by: JAY1980
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
How can you come out as a champion on States' rights for Trans rights but demand federal enforcement for marijuana?
Because it's a federal law!
How is this so hard to grasp?
Trump said it would be a law and order administration.
If we feel the law is unjust it's up to us to fight it and change it.
You conveniently seem to have left the quote out where Sessions said.
“If that’s something that’s not desired any longer Congress should pass a law to change the rule. It is not the Attorney General’s job to decide what laws to enforce.”
So who should we fight?
The people that make the laws?
Or the guy who has the job of upholding the laws?
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Rezlooper
I'm seeing "Trump" all throughout this thread so I know who the people are focused on. Sessions don't get the final decision though and Trump doesn't wanna lose support, he'll stick by the majority.