It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.macon.com...
Most of us know that smoking is linked to heart disease and cancer. But in recent years, research has shown that smoking also inhibits wound healing because it decreases blood flow. As a result, smokers don’t do as well as non-smokers after having spinal fusion surgery and joint replacements.
One study found that smokers who got joint replacement surgery had an 80 percent higher chance than nonsmokers of needing repeat surgery because of complications from infection.
For this reason, surgeons who do those procedures have begun asking patients to quit smoking – or at least stop for four to six months before and after surgery.
“We want the best results possible,” said Dr. Bryan Edwards, head of orthopedic surgery for Novant Health. “We’re not denying you a surgery. We’re preventing you from having a complication.
In Charlotte, some surgeons who perform spine surgery and knee and hip replacements have begun using a “value-based” system that means accepting a single “bundled payment” for each patient encounter. This gives doctors an incentive to provide the best care for each patient.
If all goes well and care is delivered for less than the contract price, the doctor or hospital keeps the savings. If there are complications and the patient needs more care, the doctor or hospital absorbs the extra cost.
So, operating on smokers, with potentially expensive complications, could hurt the bottom line for physicians.
Read more here: www.macon.com...#storylink=cpy
originally posted by: VegHead
What about morbidly obese patients? They have very high complication rates as well, tend to not heal well, etc. If they refuse to operate on smokers, I would think the same logic would apply to morbidly obese patients as well.
Which you might either think is justified or a slippery slope, depending on your perspective...
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: VegHead
The story covers that, the obese will just have to have barbaric surgery BEFORE the other surgery. See simple.
originally posted by: VegHead
What about morbidly obese patients? They have very high complication rates, tend to not heal well, etc. If surgeons refuse to operate on smokers, I would think the same logic would apply to morbidly obese patients too.
Which you might either think is justified or a slippery slope, depending on your perspective...
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
What about alcoholics ?