It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TRUMP Team: If cia / nsa leaked "photoshopped" info to the media? Even more criminal act!!!!

page: 3
16
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
Correct me if im wrong, but the popular vote was never Trumps, so i have to question who indeed put Trump in to power?

The system/electoral college process decided in the end, that system being part of the problem and highly manipulable by powerful people.

Why did he not win the popular vote if indeed the people put him where he is?


What? Clearly you don't understand how the U.S. election works, nothing about the electoral college was "manipulated". It was put into place at the founding of our country so that a few cities (Boston, New York at the time) couldn't dictate to the entire country. It's a very transparent ingenious system that has worked well for our country for over 200 years (until Hillary lost and Trump won, now it's so evil!). And if popular vote was the criteria, Trump would have spent time in Cali/NY, and easily could have gotten the votes needed.


edit on 18-2-2017 by TruMcCarthy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

Pretty easy to say that from this position isn't it?
Because we will never know will we?

She sure as hell wouldn't have the whole world asking WTF four weeks in.



posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

We know we know he won. Yeah he reminds us daily in case we forget.
Must be that fifty first dates thing. We forget everything when we go to sleep at night.

That doesn't change the fact that most voters voted for Hillary. It never will. Which is why we need to identify those three million illegal voters and we need to find them now...LOL.
Trump can't be second to anyone or anything.



posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

Look the democratic process or the notion of such is a nightmare in my own nation also, hence the reason its still a monarchy at heart. Certainly no better than your own.

Your right i don't understand your electoral college process. Seems to me democracy cannot function effectively unless it equates to one man/woman one vote, anything else seems to impose a form of Apartheid.

It's not 200 years ago, times change.



posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: DJW001

what is it called when a group of anonymous, unelected deep state actors employ their statecraft in illegal ways to create the appearance of impropriety within the Admin in order to smear it and create the appearance of collusion with foreign powers?

what would that be called, sir?


Unfortunately some of the actors are known Mc Cain,Graham,Ryan all these three are white anting on behalf of the Republican establishment and you can often tell from what nots happening what is happening.For example where is the criticism of Pence?,there is just the sound of crickets there all he did with Flynn was establish plausible deniability,in fact I wouldn't be surprised if he does an LBJ.
edit on 18-2-2017 by khnum because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-2-2017 by khnum because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 10:56 AM
link   
Releasing info on the inside working of the White House is a crime. It may be the morale thing to do, but still a crime. It weakens the Administrations role in conflicts and negotiations. If you do the crimes, be prepared to do the time.



posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 11:38 AM
link   
Obama release a photo shopped birth certificate. That doesn't mean he wasn't born in Hawaii, but it was photo shopped. So the White house has a history of releasing photo shopped material. There were also questions about that war room photo during that fictional Bin Laden raid. If there are Obama operatives on the inside like everyone is saying, it is not too far fetched that photo shopped material is being leaked.



posted on Feb, 18 2017 @ 12:20 PM
link   
a reply to: galien8

REPUBLICANS (in the cia / nsa / fbi / booz allen hamilton) REVOLT!!!! The time is now, the man is TRUMP, and the PLACE IS THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!!



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 12:12 AM
link   
a reply to: tribal


Use your brains guys....this is a total straw man CIA style.


And this is a total straw man FSB style. Unlike some countries, there will be open hearings and evidence presented.



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 12:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: galien8
a reply to: galien8

REPUBLICANS (in the cia / nsa / fbi / booz allen hamilton) REVOLT!!!! The time is now, the man is TRUMP, and the PLACE IS THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!!



So you are actively advocating the overthrow of the United States government? Thank you for your honesty. That is insurrection, not treason.



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 12:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nickn3
Releasing info on the inside working of the White House is a crime. It may be the morale thing to do, but still a crime. It weakens the Administrations role in conflicts and negotiations. If you do the crimes, be prepared to do the time.


It's not that simple. There are different levels of legal issues. Some things are classified to protect national security. Leaking those is indeed a crime. (Snowden.) Other types of information are covered by non-disclosure agreements. This would be a breach of contract; a civil case, not a crime. If there is nothing in writing specifying what may or may not be revealed... no crime.



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 12:30 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

BIG DIFFERENCE between a foreign hacker/spy of 5 decades (Russia) stealing Podesta e-mails, and the CIA implementing a carefully designed coupe attempt against their own boss.. the President of the United States of America.



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 07:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: galien8
a reply to: galien8

REPUBLICANS (in the cia / nsa / fbi / booz allen hamilton) REVOLT!!!! The time is now, the man is TRUMP, and the PLACE IS THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!!



So you are actively advocating the overthrow of the United States government? Thank you for your honesty. That is insurrection, not treason.


NO! ...the man is TRUMP... means THE MAN (that can make USA great again)



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 07:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

There's no election after he gets impeached. There is a pecking order .
The next election is still 2020.



Yes I heard it too, Mike Pence will become president according to The Constitution, just like Gerald Ford replacing Richard Nixon, vice president replaces president when president get impeached



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 07:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: galien8

How can telling the truth ever be considered to be a criminal act?

The truth may not always set us free but its generally the best policy.

What kind of example are we setting for our children by condemning people who speak the truth?


If it is the truth, these days with fake news and manipulated digital evidence we will never know.

...The Truth ist tot, Der Lord ist fort...



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: galien8

Two items:

1. The leaks were by less than ten individuals according to reports. There are thousands of folks involved in the US covert services.

2. How much of your post revolves around the "if" in your second paragraph? Perhaps to display the proper significance you should have done something like ...

IF ...
edit on 19-2-2017 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 07:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
There's no election after he gets impeached. There is a pecking order .
The next election is still 2020.


Hypothetical there could be a double impeachment of president and vice president
if vice president is somehow implicated by that leaked manipulated fake digital evidence
edit on 2017-2-19 by galien8 because: typo



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 07:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: galien8

Two items:

1. The leaks were by less than ten individuals according to reports. There are thousands of folks involved in the US covert services.

2. How much of your post revolves around the "if" in your second paragraph? Perhaps to display the proper significance you should have done something like ...

IF ...


0.5^8 => 1 in 256



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 07:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: galien8

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: galien8

Two items:

1. The leaks were by less than ten individuals according to reports. There are thousands of folks involved in the US covert services.

2. How much of your post revolves around the "if" in your second paragraph? Perhaps to display the proper significance you should have done something like ...

IF ...


0.5^8 => 1 in 256


Sure. And 0 = 2.

Now.

Two items:

1. The leaks were by less than ten individuals according to reports. There are thousands of folks involved in the US covert services.

2. How much of your post revolves around the "if" in your second paragraph? Perhaps to display the proper significance you should have done something like ...
edit on 19-2-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Feb, 19 2017 @ 08:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: galien8

0.5^8 => 1 in 256




Sure. And 0 = 2.

Now.

Two items:

1. The leaks were by less than ten individuals according to reports. There are thousands of folks involved in the US covert services.

2. How much of your post revolves around the "if" in your second paragraph? Perhaps to display the proper significance you should have done something like ...



you had [size=8]IF ...[/size] [ = [ I thought it was pseudo code


I tend to think in scenarios I fit them with the facts I have and extrapolate







 
16
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join