RT to Trump: The Honeymoon is over.

a reply to: uncommitted

Please spare us the excuses about the popular vote loss by Trump by stating things for which there is no evidence whatsover

No evidence?

www.washingtontimes.com...

Almost a million that they freely admit to.

I am willing to bet money that the actual number is far higher.

You can't even get on a plane nowadays without showing some ID, the far-left screams “voter suppression” and brings lawyers affiliated with the Democratic Party to court to litigate every time efforts are made to pass voter ID laws.

a reply to: Monger

I didn't say they were racists, I said they were hicks

LOL, like thats a better way of putting it. OK, I'll pretend that when you say hicks, you don't really mean "racists". After all "hicks" aren't stereotyped as being racist right?

The white victimhood thing is what you're peddling.

Please quote me in a post where I'm preaching white victimhood.

Your posts on the other hand, show where your true colors lie.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: uncommitted

Please spare us the excuses about the popular vote loss by Trump by stating things for which there is no evidence whatsover

No evidence?

www.washingtontimes.com...

Almost a million that they freely admit to.

I am willing to bet money that the actual number is far higher.

You can't even get on a plane nowadays without showing some ID, the far-left screams “voter suppression” and brings lawyers affiliated with the Democratic Party to court to litigate every time efforts are made to pass voter ID laws.

I'm sorry, you are quoting from a blog that is making assumptions on what a person thinks might have happened and that person (working with no actual facts mind) even goes on to say in your link -

“Is it plausible that non-citizen votes account for the entire nation-wide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.”

You really didn't think through what you posted did you? The person quoted is putting forward a hypothetical argument, so again, no actual evidence whatsoever.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
Please quote me in a post where I'm preaching white victimhood.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: Monger

So white people are all hicks now? Half the country are just racist ignorant rednecks? And how is this picture supposed to back up your claim?

I made no claim that those hicks were racist, that was your spin you put on my words. You jumped on the word 'hick' like I dropped the n-bomb and accused me of calling them racist. I didn't. To me, that smells an awful lot like 'muh white oppression.' Maybe I misinterpreted.

a reply to: Monger

You jumped on the word 'hick' like I dropped the n-bomb

How the hell is one label being thrown around better than another?

And how do you know all of the people in your picture are "hicks"? I only see white people at that picture. Even though I'm sure I can post pictures of Trump at rallies with black people, women, Mexicans, so your picture proves absolutely nothing in your statement of "starstruck hicks only voted for trump"

Which by your very own admission, means half the country are "hicks".

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

It seems pretty apparent that Russia pressed some pretty significant buttons during your last election.

The only thing apparent is that everyone keeps saying it, yet offers nothing in the way of proof.
"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it."
-Hitler

I'm sorry...did Flynn not just quit because he was part of a continuing relationship between the Russians and the Trump team? Is he not the third to do so?

You know, I don't have a dog in this fight...I don't have to argue, I just let the story unfold.

a reply to: uncommitted

You really didn't think through what you posted did you?

You said there was NO evidence.

I said that there is.

Its not my responsibility to inform you. I'm sure oyu have a google search bar. Use it.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: uncommitted

You really didn't think through what you posted did you?

You said there was NO evidence.

I said that there is.

Its not my responsibility to inform you. I'm sure oyu have a google search bar. Use it.

That doesn't show any evidence that the non citizen voting the writer of the blog postulated had actually happened, or that the non citizen voting had been in Clintons favour - you said it was evidence, you are wrong. You said the difference was through illegal immigrants and people using the identity of dead people, I didn't, you are the one who needs to stand by your claim, I don't have to prove it.

I haven't got a google search bar actually, I always say no when downloaded software asks me if it can install things I don't want. If I want google I'll go to google.

a reply to: uncommitted

That doesn't show any evidence that the non citizen voting the writer of the blog postulated had actually happened, or that the non citizen voting had been in Clintons favour - you said it was evidence, you are wrong.

They have never had a formal investigation into it. So if you want me to hand you a website with some smoking gun proof that there was voter fraud you know that's impossible.

I haven't got a google search bar actually

Maybe you should get a search engine then. That article was the first hit on a google search "Hillary voter fraud"

And just because it is a blog, how does that detract from the information within? All news articles are blogs. Its from a left leaning news outlet no less saying that there are definate suspicions.

I was just showing you how easy it is to access this kind of information if you just look.

That was just the first hit.

a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

It seems pretty apparent that Russia pressed some pretty significant buttons during your last election.

Repeating something over and over doesn't make it true. By the by, the west is the one pushing the world's "buttons".

a reply to: intrptr

The talking has been going on since last year.
What does Russia have on trump?
More than the dirty little dossier for sure.

a reply to: Cancerwarrior

They have never had a formal investigation into it. So if you want me to hand you a website with some smoking gun proof that there was voter fraud you know that's impossible.

So your claim -

Not counting all of the dead people and illegal immigrants who voted for Hillary?

Carries no weight whatsoever. Fail.

I won't 'get myself a search engine', I choose when to use one and tend not to click on sites that make claims of such fraud with no evidence, but lots of innuendo that's considered plausible by those that are desperate to believe it.

a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

I'm sorry...did Flynn not just quit because he was part of a continuing relationship between the Russians and the Trump team?

Considering the lies told about him, the new admin, and the russians in general, maybe he decided this country isn't worth defending anymore.

What empire that wages unjust aggressive war under false pretenses is?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: intrptr

The talking has been going on since last year.
What does Russia have on trump?
More than the dirty little dossier for sure.

Who cares about Trump secrets, lol? The issue before Russia is all that NATO hardware massing on their border.

Talk is cheap.

a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

I'm sorry...did Flynn not just quit because he was part of a continuing relationship between the Russians and the Trump team?

No sir.

He quit because he lied to Pence about talking to them.

There is much more to this story than this simplistic version they keep repeating. Preibus is about to get canned mark my words. He is a total muppetfart, and many suspect him of leaking this to the MSM. There is a Deep State shadow government of unelected officials trying like hell to stop Trump at all costs. He is Anti-Globalist and unpredictable for them.

And its easy to see for people that have been paying attention. Trump pisses off a whole lot of the establishment politicians that have been pissing me ( and many other Americans) off for a while now.

It helps establish the narrative that they have been pushing since the campaign of this Russia/Trump alliance. An alliance which so far, is just talk. Nobody can seem to "prove" that "Russia hacked the election" and all these other claims about the evil Russians. How do you hack voting machines that aren't capable of an internet connection? They want people to believe that the only reason Trump got elected is because of the Russians. They get to impeach trump and get their boogeyman the russians back. Win win for them.

Heck I ought to post that in the Prophecies forum.....

a reply to: uncommitted

I won't 'get myself a search engine'

Then you would miss Obama bragging about how illegals will not be deported or face any legal action for voting. You would miss Bob Creamer talking ON camera about how easy it is to commit voter fraud. etc. etc. etc. You would miss out on all of the claims from precints about people that have been dead for decades on the voter lists......

So once again, there is alot of evidence, just no proof like what you are asking for. Just look.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: uncommitted

I won't 'get myself a search engine'

Then you would miss Obama bragging about how illegals will not be deported or face any legal action for voting. You would miss Bob Creamer talking ON camera about how easy it is to commit voter fraud. etc. etc. etc. You would miss out on all of the claims from precints about people that have been dead for decades on the voter lists......

So once again, there is alot of evidence, just no proof like what you are asking for. Just look.

No, none of that - not one piece is evidence, it's all hearsay apart from one piece. When someone dies, it appears in America that when their death is officially declared, their name is not automatically removed from a voter list - end of. That in itself means absolutely nothing. Still more innuendo with neither evidence or proof.

a reply to: uncommitted

No, none of that - not one piece is evidence,

Once again, evidence, and proof are two totally different things that you are confusing.

Can I provide you evidence of voter fraud? Sure can. But as you're too lazy or unwilling to get a search bar, I'm too lazy and unwilling to post a list of websites and videos for you to look at and scrutinize.

Educate yourself.

originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: uncommitted

No, none of that - not one piece is evidence,

Once again, evidence, and proof are two totally different things that you are confusing.

Can I provide you evidence of voter fraud? Sure can. But as you're too lazy or unwilling to get a search bar, I'm too lazy and unwilling to post a list of websites and videos for you to look at and scrutinize.

Educate yourself.

This is becoming tiresome. Evidence is facts that added together provide potential proof.

a. The means by which an allegation may be proven, such as oral testimony, documents, or physical objects.
b. The set of legal rules determining what testimony, documents, and objects may be admitted as proof in a trial.

www.thefreedictionary.com...

Evidence isn't somebody saying it could happen (oral testimony would be someone saying they witnessed it happen, fairly sure you don't have that from a reliable source), that's hearsay. I hope that helped educate you just a little - every little counts.

originally posted by: Monger
a reply to: TheSpottedOwl

Smoke meet fire.

www.businessinsider.com...
www.businessinsider.com...
www.reuters.com...
www.dailykos.com...

Is it going to stand up to a Trump supporters rigorous Pizzagate level of proof? Probably not. But to me it's pretty clear.

Source; ex MI6 spy........


"tuh duh tuh duh tuh tuh duh.....""