It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: AMPTAH
We still don't know exactly what was said in that phone call. It could have been a passing comment from the ambassador and the media is making a bigger deal of it than it was.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Telos
His phone was tapped. The intelligence community know what was said in those conversations. Regardless of whether there are people in the government out to get Trump what Flynn said in those conversations was apparently a violation of the Logan Act. Then not only did he violate the Logan Act he lied about the content of those conversations to his bosses who now look like idiots for repeating those lies on national television.
Flynn screwed up. He deserved to be fired. End of story.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: StoutBroux
How do we know that nothing was done? Apparently Yates warned Trump about Flynn and he did nothing. Hell, apparently the administration were briefed on what Flynn did last month and they sat on the information. So who knows when they were first actually informed about what occurred.
“Trump may think Flynn is the sacrificial lamb, but the reality is that he is the first domino. To the extent the administration believes Flynn’s resignation will make the Russia story go away, they are mistaken,” said Susan Hennessey, a former NSA lawyer.
“Flynn’s resignation validates the suspicions of many in Washington that something is seriously amiss with regard to President Trump’s ties to Russia. This is the third member of Trump’s circle to be pushed out over Russia-linked scandals,” she said.
“This is only going to increase pressure from both the public and Congress demanding a full accounting of the nature of Trump’s connections to Russia both now and during the campaign.
The Washington Post reported on Monday that former acting attorney general Sally Yates informed him last month that Flynn’s misleading statements to Vice-President Mike Pence and other officials could leave him open to Russian blackmail. But it was Yates who was sacked, over her refusal to defend Trump’s travel ban, not Flynn. ”
originally posted by: Damiel
My feeling is that he's a scapegoat for initially sanctioned behind the scenes moves
(Reagan/Iran hostages come to mind) but :
Yup Alex jones fully sold out.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Telos
Alex Jones is a shill for Trump.
In reality, Flynn’s conversation with Kislyak was merely the excuse that establishment neo-cons and neo-libs from both parties were desperately searching for.
Flynn’s conversation was about lifting sanctions , shifting the blame is the Donald's territory.
The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N.Korea etc?
twitter.com...
The real story here is he lied to the VP and the administrations closeness to the Russian government ,but ...look over there !
originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
a reply to: Xcalibur254
I am still waiting for evidence of Logan Act violation. I doubt he will ever be charged because the case is too weak.
Obama definitely violated the Logan Act but nobody seemed to care.
2008 Candidate Senator Obama Sent U.S. Secret Emissary To Iran Telling Them Not To Negotiate With George Bush – Said Wait For Him To Be Elected….
The facts of this story have existed in discussion since last year, yet failed to capture traction until the recent protestations of VP Joe Biden, and Secretary of State John Kerry.
From a radio interview in October of 2014 Mark Levin discusses with Michael Leeden the details of a secret message sent by candidate Senator Barack Obama to Iran in 2008 via a former Ambassador, William G Miller.
In essence the content of the communique was Senator Obama telling the Iranian government not to negotiate with the outgoing George Bush administration because Obama was more friendly toward the position of Iran and he would work to structure a more favorable outcome to the Iranian people.
theconservativetreehouse.com... e-bush-said-wait-for-him-to-be-elected/
Or do people think it was just coincidence that Iran released the hostages right after he was inaugurated?
originally posted by: AMPTAH
originally posted by: Damiel
My feeling is that he's a scapegoat for initially sanctioned behind the scenes moves
(Reagan/Iran hostages come to mind) but :
It's pretty obvious, that Trump was behind Flynn's actions. Trump felt Obama was increasing sanctions on Russia, just to make it difficult for he Trump to get good relations with Putin when he entered office.
Trump wanted to hit the road running.
So, he authorized Flynn to communicate to the Russians their willingness to lift the sanctions as quickly as possible, to preempt any Russian moves at retaliating for Obama's actions, which would make it more difficult to "turn things around" once Trump got into power.
So, they were acting before the inauguration to undo the work of the Obama administration, to fit their own coming policies, to give themselves a jump start.
Maybe Pence didn't know anything about it, since Trump and Flynn may have had their own understanding.
So, when Pence asked Flynn, since Pence was out of the loop on this one, Flynn couldn't tell him without compromising the secret conversations he had with Trump. Flynn had to lie to Pence.
That, of course, made Pence mad, since he is the vice-president.
And so it goes...
But it did work, because Putin made a grand stand of showing
"' when they go low, we go high"
and refused to retaliate for the sanctions.
originally posted by: AMPTAH
originally posted by: olaru12
Flynn was just trying to protect Trump, but Trump threw him under the bus anyway. Flynn will be investigated and might spill his guts about the "real" Russian connection. This is why the Trump team in place now is in total chaos. They know the hammer is about to fall.....
The administration is trying to sell this as Flynn having a trust issue, but did nothing illegal.
The reason they are trying so hard to get everybody repeat "trust" as the cause, is that, not only was Flynn's actions illegal, but must have been sanctioned by Trump himself. If they admit it's illegal, then further investigation is required, and Trump gets implicated, and maybe impeached. If they get everybody to accept it's an internal "trust" issue, then by firing Flynn, the case is over, and people stop looking at it.