It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Long-lasting mental health isn’t normal
The vast majority of people experience at least a temporary mental disorder by age 38, a long-term study finds. A small percentage stays mentally healthy and often, but not always, reports enhanced well-being.
Abnormal is the new normal in mental health.
A small, poorly understood segment of the population stays mentally healthy from age 11 to 38, a new study of New Zealanders finds. Everyone else encounters either temporary or long-lasting mental disorders.
Only 171 of 988 participants, or 17 percent, experienced no anxiety disorders, depression or other mental ailments from late childhood to middle age, researchers report in the February Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Of the rest, half experienced a transient mental disorder, typically just a single bout of depression, anxiety or substance abuse by middle age.
...“For many, an episode of mental disorder is like influenza, bronchitis, kidney stones, a broken bone or other highly prevalent conditions,” says study coauthor Jonathan Schaefer, a psychologist at Duke University. “Sufferers experience impaired functioning, many seek medical care, but most recover.”
...Less surprising was the 83 percent overall prevalence rate for mental disorders. That coincides with recent estimates from four other long-term projects. In those investigations — two in the United States, one in Switzerland and another in New Zealand — between 61 percent and 85 percent of participants developed mental disorders over 12- to 30-year spans.
originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: hutch622
a reply to: Sheye
a reply to: libertytoall
I dunno guys. I look around my neighbourhood, ATS, FB, most anywhere - and it's pretty clear to me the all the studies cited are pretty much dead on.
I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me. Hunter S. Thompson
I dunno guys. I look around my neighbourhood, ATS, FB, most anywhere - and it's pretty clear to me the all the studies cited are pretty much dead on.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
I think we have far too many things that we label as 'mental illness' as opposed to just being on the spectrum of genuine human emotion.
Our scale for that was very black and white until the last 20 years, if that. So this means that we spent the better part of 100 years asserting that anything outside of 'culturally accepted or socially accepted behaviour' as falling into a mental illness.
The overwhelming stigma about mental health hasn't helped either. I also think that the pharmaceutical industry has a large part to play in this since they started pushing RSSI's more and more. And that's not to say they don't work for some, there's most certainly a need.
But part of the reason kids these days are having anxiety disorders as young as 10 or 12 is because of the expectations put upon them and the other subsequent cocktail of poor nutrition, education and drugs found in tap water, among other things.
~Tenth
originally posted by: Sheye
I think many are too quick to deem natural human reaction to very sad and disappointing issues as " mental health " problems.
It's perfectly natural and human to react to sad circumstances in ones life and to label that as mental illness is demoralizing to a perfectly good human heart. 😕
originally posted by: Sheye
I think many are too quick to deem natural human reaction to very sad and disappointing issues as " mental health " problems.