It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: deadlyhope
a reply to: rickymouse
Okay I think I'm giving up on this thread.
What I said was "Some things may need to be handled at the federal level" and "state government should inherit a lot of the power and responsibilities the federal government "
What people took that as " Let's instate anarchy and chaos and have no federal rules at all "
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: deadlyhope
Most of what you are calling for is exactly what Trump has said he wants to do.
He wants to reduce Federal control over many things and give that power back to the states.
There are way too many Federal regulations, and Trump is already working on reducing them.
But there are certain things that need to be handled Federally for common sense reasons.
These are covered in the Constitution, and include things like national security, immigration, trade deals with other countries, etc.
originally posted by: deadlyhope
a reply to: rickymouse
Okay I think I'm giving up on this thread.
What I said was "Some things may need to be handled at the federal level" and "state government should inherit a lot of the power and responsibilities the federal government "
What people took that as " Let's instate anarchy and chaos and have no federal rules at all "
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
We need a larger State foot print and a smaller Federal footprint. There is a reason we are 50 united states and not just one big democracy. It seems those on the left want that single democracy where the fed dictates everything and the majority rules.
The problem is what does a person who disagrees with the feds do?....where do they go? Take the legalization of pot as example. One state you can smoke it open, but the feds will put you away for 20 years... If you do not like how a state is then move to another state that agrees with your views...very simple... There is a reason I will not live in CA, well I would if someone was willing to pay me an exorbitant amount to do so. If the whole US became CA then no choice is available and many on the left would like it that way.
I believe the Federal Government needs a massive reduction in power.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
Two words..."State's Rights".
Leave education to the states.
Leave healthcare to the states.
Leave infrastructure to the states.
Leave law enforcement to the states (with the exception of Border Patrol...which is better aligned with national defense).
Leave environmental to the states.
Leave energy to the states.
Leave transportation to the states.
Leave agriculture to the states.
Leave housing (HUD, etc.) to the states.
Leave Labor to the states.
The only thing which should be federal is Defense and Homeland Security (but get rid of the TSA...they're worthless).
Can you imagine how much money $$$,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ we just saved right there????????
originally posted by: deadlyhope
a reply to: Caver78
And I've said several times that I am not saying the Fed should not make any laws, or should be gotten rid of or made 100% obsolete - Just that mostly we should be able to do what we want, and in some instances may have to follow national guidelines, or work within a standard.
originally posted by: Caver78
a reply to: deadlyhope
I agree with the sentiment, but having seen what some of the States have come up with on their own, some Federal laws are necessary. Which is an unpopular notion, but whatever.