Think the Vault is open

a reply to: Rosinitiate

I hit some highlights, but have it bookmarked. Been meaning to listen to it all.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

The only existing video I have found was:

twitter.com...

and it's from the come, stay awhile.

The clue that led to the Airborne March with the don't ask (hotel) message was the hotel listed on the wikipedia sight.

It seems rather apparent in hindsight that it really was meant as a communication to someone. (a meet up as it were) no need for the videos anymore and they received too much attention. They likely served their purpose. So very Clancy.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Gut, I don't have a clue cause I am so selective in who I read

From anonscan account thus far

.@kloloria
.@kardaddy
.@magatastica
So you thought your new Sock-account would work?
Have a nice day, but not with us.
Anonymous

a reply to: The GUT

I am becoming as lost at you and others in this.

Pay attention to Rosinitate. He stays more up to date than I. I am too scattered with other issues.

Just for the record Julian Assange has activated his very own twitter account, wiki leaks have confirmed it's his official twitter so those of you following wiki leaks or those that use twitter may want to keep an eye on his account

Ok here Julian Assange
Twitter Page

Fake or what

Look at the Joined Date -------- October 2011 ???????????

originally posted by: Trillium
Ok here Julian Assange
Twitter Page

Fake or what

I don't know what to make of it but wikileaks official page is promoting it as Julian's own twitter account. Whether it's a set up I don't know just be interesting to watch

a reply to: Trillium didn't even noticed the joining date to be honest but I'm under the impression Julian may of registered his account then but has only activated it? I don't know how it all works just thought I'd give a heads up for people who may want to keep and eye on it

I'm so dumb I can't even find where it says a joined date.. then again I'm using my phone so might not show it

Vault7 opens Sunday.

Vault7

I'd be more concerned about BadmoonRising

originally posted by: canDarian
Vault7 opens Sunday.

Where did that come from?

Noticed he was using the word 'canilis'

Can someone translate his header?

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: canDarian
Vault7 opens Sunday.

Where did that come from?

Noticed he was using the word 'canilis'

Can someone translate his header?

Go back a page (page 11) it's translated at the bottom. The cartoon strip was posted by Julian's cat twitter

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: canDarian
Vault7 opens Sunday.

Where did that come from?

Noticed he was using the word 'canilis'

Can someone translate his header?

Go back a page (page 11) it's translated at the bottom. The cartoon strip was posted by Julian's cat twitter

May have miss something
Twitter

Ok...so I've been "scanning" this whole Vault7 on Reddit, AboveTopSecret, Twitter and some other sites as well and the only thing I could gather from all of the hoopla is...

1. So far there are supposedly three factions involved; Riptide (Twitter Username), AnonScandinavia and Wikileaks.
2. Two major theories about Vault7; Hillary Clinton's emails (part of the FBI investigation) and 9/11 disclosure files.
3. Apparently February 19 is the deadline for full disclosure.
4. George Soros' name keeps coming up.

Plus, forgive me if it's been discussed here or elsewhere earlier, I'm a bit intrigued by a video released by AnonScan on February 9 on Twitter's #Vault7. As I cannot provide a link on the video I'll just post a verbatim text here:



On 2nd Feb. we posted an "ALERT"-video for the simple, yet very important reason that we saw A Bad Moon Rising. We made that for a reason.

As you all know, it became a little chaotic 2 days later, when Wikileaks launched their Tweet concerning #Vault7.

We have nothing but admiration for SAM and Wikileaks not to mention Whistleblowers in general.

We have always been Fighting for the Truth and Freedom of Speech so when that is endangered, we act accordingly. If you listened to the lyrics while watching the video, you have already observed that there is an intended "connection" between same. Just like our hints in the song you listen to right now, originally posted 7th Feb. and our video concerning: "We have the chance to Turn The Pages Over".

So maybe #ItsTime to rerun this video and listen again from the very beginning.

In example:
"Flew out of London"
"collect me from Kennedy"
"Well I really didn't wanna go there"
"But the man said ( you gotta go )"
"Watch out! America"

There's more in that and other videos too.

Did you see the CAT-video?
What does the cat ( kitten ) do ?
Does it have a name apart from a Twitter-handle ?
If not, what is the cat then ?
A bit Anonymous maybe.

Anyway, we anticipate you will all here from Wikileaks within the next 7 hours. The deal was once done. #ItsTime for compliance. It is like a Contract. For Both Individuals. A testimony. Another word for that is...

... the keyword for #Vault7

The keyword will be

"Will"



Very cryptic...I read somewhere that maybe it's Assange's "deal" with the U.S., release of Hillary's emails in exchange for his surrender. Although I highly doubt that Assange would turn himself in for the demise of just one individual power in his fight against truth and freedom. He still has a lot of big fish to catch out there.

What is the deal that needs compliance? For me, it seems that AnonScan is pressuring Wikileaks to do something that it promised to do or else they will do it for them. I'm not sure though...it's just an impression.

Plus I saw in their other post, there seems to be a link between, Hillary, Wikileaks and Google.

Sigh...

Obama's Air Force One is a good one.

a reply to: IQPREREQUISITE

I need to rewatch the Bad Moon vid (actually a fav song). Was watching so many they began to run together What/who is SAM?

As to the Its Time vid

There was much speculation he was taken to US (Kennedy) when internet was cut. There was some incident at London airport that evening as well...a cover? Who would he make a deal with in Obama adm? or was there a deal with CIA/FBI opposition? Think Weiner's laptop had been acquired about that time. But if they had him, why make a deal?

There is a long excerpt from JA book about his meeting with Google owner. Google is essentially part of the deep state gov. They know everything on HRC likely, as does JA.

Best I can do. Now just wait for release from someone.

a reply to: liveandlearn

So there's a theory he was taken in...well that goes right well into some of the things I've been reading. That Wikileaks was compromised and that JA is dead or indisposed.

Truth be told, I'm really wary about the way this whole thing is unveiling itself. I mean, this isn't JA's style...running clues here and there, teasing us with videos...etc. As one youtube channel pointed out...we're being Rick Rolled.

This isn't Wikileaks' style. Something's off somewhere that I can't put my finger into.

This is like playing a watered down version of CICADA 3301...or that Oct21011 website from way, waaay back.

Ok, I've been trying to make sense of all the back and forth about this issue but there's too many sources, too many threads to follow.....

However, in my travels i came across a YouTube video entitled "30 reasons assange is in room 101"


I'll paste the link but not sure if that's allowed? Anyway, it's easy to find. I IMPLORE you to go and watch that before i get onto the next bit... I'll wait...


m.youtube.com...


Ok, so, assuming you've watched the video, you will see that there appears to be a possibility that Assange has been taken and his safety maybe at risk.

With that in mind, some of the stuff coming from AnonScandinavia starts to make a little more sense.

They make reference to the embassy cat, ask what does it do (it stands guard/watchful), does it have a name?"If not then perhaps it's a little bit anonymous". This can be translated as: anonymous watches over Assange.
Now, with the talk in the video about dead man's switches and insurance files, it got me thinking that this could be further translated to: Anonymous (or parts thereof, perhaps anonscan) take care of the insurance files for Assange.

Perhaps the message here is not to us but to Wikileak, those who have compromised it (if it is) or those who are in the know about Assange's welfare or even to Assange himself. Perhaps they are saying that, unless they get the prearranged response/code to assure them that Assange is safe they will dump the insurance files as per the plan.

That would explain the cloak and dagger (they couldn't just come out and say "tell us you're ok or we'll dump the files, aside from anything else it would make them a huge target if they admitted they held that kind of info) , the deadlines and dates and the bad moon rising/foreboding tone. It would explain the reference to a contract being made, except it is THEY who are obliged by the contract, and it would explain why they said (in one tweet) that they anticipated that everyone would "hear from wikileaks within the next seven hours" (which proved to be incorrect).
It would also explain AnonScan's reluctance to divulge information and their trepidation in releasing the information. I assume whatever they have (if i'm correct in all this) would be HUGE and they absolutely would NOT release it unless they were absolutely SURE they needed to.

I know this is perhaps a bit of a stretch, i'm maybe reaching here,, but this is all I've got after a couple of days of trawling through all this stuff....

Sorry i haven't linked all the tweets and letters etc I've referred to but i'm not really on a device that's particularly good for this kind of thing.

ETA: Oh, weird, started writing this hours ago and only just got to posting it up, now i see there's similar posts above. Sorry about that..





AnonScan have also just retweeted wikileaks saying that julian assange has activated his twitter account with "we love this one" as the caption followed by
"And this one #rofl" which is a retweet of the julian assange message saying rumours of his death have been greatly exaggerated. In the context of what i wrote above the tone of the anonscan tweets seem to be mocking rather than celebrating... Could be reading it wrong though...

a reply to: IQPREREQUISITE

I think those who,what,why ect. tweets were directed to the US gov. A week or little more before they started there was a wikileak tweet directed to DOJ, if I recall right, saying "your move". It seemed to relate to Manning's release and what he said about turning himself in if Manning was pardoned. Seems their may have been some additional agreement that didn't happen. Someone in gov understands.

At the same time, he has to release something big regardless or all credibility will be lost. Just my thoughts.

BTW, wasn't his internet cut after Weiner's laptop was confiscated? Not sure.

a reply to: Indrasweb

Just watched the video. It was laid out nicely. In one of the docs release with the 1984 101 text also had a message 'They have my family'. Didn't go back to research so don't know if truely came from text.

The next seven hours was written last night and JA is back on twitter today with 1 tweet. Think they may have been referencing that.

As for the tweet, perhaps mocking a troll. AnonScan has been blocking them last couple of days.

I agree, too much input from too many it is hard to sort truth or know who to trust

a reply to: Indrasweb

This:

Perhaps the message here is not to us but to Wikileak, those who have compromised it (if it is) or those who are in the know about Assange's welfare or even to Assange himself. Perhaps they are saying that, unless they get the prearranged response/code to assure them that Assange is safe they will dump the insurance files as per the plan.

In a nut shell is what I'm understanding also.