It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: savemebarry
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
Can I suggest that certain people stop bullying the OP and offer logical input for discussion?
I cannot believe that for a couple of one liners people get starred just because thay are well known here on ATS...
How embarrasing.
Warmest
Lags
I'd agree, but the OP has history of posting things claiming with certainty that it is paranormal, while no one else can hear a thing. Not saying they should stop, but rather than insist something is there, be a little more objective about it.
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lagomorphe
The logical input has been rendered. It's a dust mote caught in the strobe.
In your opinion Phage... (I respect and understand...) BUT...
It would be nice to hear other members thoughts and "detailed" questions etc too instead of trying to debunk straight away.
Did you see my response and my skeptical questions? This is what ATS is about... questioning... In my opinion...? (Maybe I am wrong in your opinion?)
Warmest
Lags
So if someone post a picture of a tomato and says it's a suspension bridge, we have to form "detailed" questions and attempt to discuss it with the op?
Were not allowed to debunk a picture strait away because a few people want to cling to delusion, so we have to tip toe around the obvious?
Discuss with the op all you want, but don't expect the rest of us to do the same just so a few people don't have to face facts, all for the sake of their emotional attachment to their own opinion.
DENY IGNORANCE...
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
ATS used to be about discussion and not trying to be a smart arse and debunking straight away
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lagomorphe
DENY IGNORANCE...
...does not mean accept everything someone says at face value.
did you overlook them and chose just to answer the OPs first post?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lagomorphe
did you overlook them and chose just to answer the OPs first post?
Since I responded to the OP before you did, I would say the answer is obviously yes.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lagomorphe
did you overlook them and chose just to answer the OPs first post?
Since I responded to the OP before you did, I would say the answer is obviously yes.
I do not posses a TARDIS.
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
a reply to: savemebarry
Monopoly : Go to prison
Warmest
Lags
" I have a love/hate relationship with Engineers "
You dont happen to be a Geologist are you?!
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
a reply to: Stevemagegod
Simple photography artifact, nothing paranormal about it. Anyone with basic photography knowledge can debunk this orb bs pretty fast. My sister was a photography major and one of my best friends freelances as a photographer at the racetrack and for local car clubs. "Orbs" pop up from time to time and can be(and have been) easily explained.
Lens flares explained
Your wasting a lot of time on something that's been throughly debunked, which means you either refuse to look at anything that might disagree with your paradigm, or you just refuse to believe it when you do look into it. Basic confirmation bias from someone who doesn't understand photography.
On another note, how much time do you spend recording yourself sleeping and then listening to that recording later?
Gotta be the most mind numbingly boring hobby ever.
originally posted by: WhateverYouSay
So you claim you saw this with your own eyes before the photo. You say it was around for a minute, so I have a few questions
Did you try and touch it? If no, why not?
What do you think the likelihood of taking a photo of 3 items when one is only slightly different and you acknowledge the other 2 are dust particles for the odd one out not to be a dust particle as well?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lagomorphe
The logical input has been rendered. It's a dust mote caught in the strobe.
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
Thanks for the pictures Steve.
My thoughts and questions :
1. Concerning the "orbs" : Have you considered the amount of dust that all that wood panelling and floorboarding may create (not to mention human skin/clothing particles and dog skin/fur particles)... Easiest way to check is to focus on a ray of sunlight shining into the room during the day and observing the dust particles.
2. Taking into account the amount of wood in the room have you also not considered the fluctation in temperatures from day to night that may contribute to the wood "moving to adjust" and creating those "banging" noises?
3. Those noises also sound almost mechanical with the same rythm... is this room above your boiler room or next to a room where you have a washing machine or another type of electrical appliance working?
4. What is that white object below the top "orb" and just above the right top side of the TV? A wall ornament?
Just thinking out aloud...
Warmest respects
Lags
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lagomorphe
DENY IGNORANCE...
...does not mean accept everything someone says at face value.