CNN: rioters at Berkeley were actually "Right wing" agent provocateurs.

a reply to: D8Tee

How dare you bring up this celebrity's interest in feet. The protesters are mere-cats trying to plagiarize what is dangerous in order to keep themselves safe; there is no shame

What happened to debate and delving into an idea of a conspiracy? This is 100% what ATS is about. This is a perfect topic to delve into, do research, to find out if it really is a conspiracy, but no, 6 pages of people reply "NO" and "LIBTARD" - can we move past that and get back to actual discussion?

-double post-

I'm mean, why not? Why is it that everything negative that comes out about the right = lies, and everything about the left = truth?

We saw it constantly between Trump and Clinton during the election cycle. Hillary vomits reptilian eggs... FACT! Trump touched a woman inappropriately... Lies from the left!

a reply to: Speedtek

as far as I'm concerned, unless the man that was in the interview can prove that he knows all 38,204 (Fall 2015) rounded up to 40,000 students that attend the University of California, Berkeley, by sight and with no help. everything he said is all bull@@.

a reply to: gladtobehere>>> He was right in that they were most likely not students but he is most likely wrong in that they were right wingers. Outsiders, some paid to show up and incite violence but again, they would have been on the payroll of someone like George Soros or inspired by a hatred of Trump. The guy is an idiot, but being on CNN that was probably easy to figure out.

nah nah nah nah nah nah I can't hear you. Fake news, Triggered. Libtards, Snowflakes. nah nah nah nah nah nah

a reply to: seagull

Is what I'm attempting to do to a degree. Get more of us to speak against these things.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: smurfy

Despite what it looks like by way of how it landed, my post was not directed at you.

Right, I get you now.

a reply to: gladtobehere

Well up until now, it's all been the liberals who've gone rioting, burning, looting and attacking people...so for the 'right' to dress up in 'mad cow' clothing and start doing the same thing...possible, but unlikely.

# CNN. They are most certainly one of the most untrustworthy places for news....not that we've a plethora of choices that actually do their jobs and don't just read what they're told mind you...lol.

Great post!

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: amazing

Sure people could do that, but that's just giving up and letting the rioters and looters win. All people want are for those who are actually protesting to stand up with us against the rioters and looters, and prove they don't approve that way. Prove they are non-violent and stand for decency.

Not just sit there and say, "But it's only a small percent of us, you can't blame all of us, whaaaaa!!!!" These people are rioting, and looting, hurting people and more all in your name, where's your goddamn outrage? It's all partly your fault, because you're not helping stand against them and doing your part to let them know, this is not acceptable and you all don't stand with them.

I'm left wing for the most part, I want to bring sanity back to the left. Stop making excuses and letting this # fly, and join me in denouncing these bastards, and make a pact with the right to in bipartisanship stand together against the crazy loonies on both sides that do this #. Sadly at this point if being honest we have to realize it's us on the left that are doing the worst # at the moment.

Join the just coined, "Normal rational people against crazy lunatics movement"

There are elements in society seeking to undermine us all with these violent protestors, many whom are paid to do so. Help stand against them. Legitimate protests cannot exist or succeed as long as we sit back and allow these violent elements to exist unchallenged.

Coincidentally that is also what muslims do.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: amazing

We need to find a way to bypass the media blackout then.

That's truth right there. I think we're trending that way with the rise of social media, but it's the main stream media that is the core problem and we play right along with it. And it doesn't matter what it is...

Take...
...the tea party..we only see the guys with colonial hats with tea bags hanging from it on the news.
...Gary pride parade...they only show the most flamboyant and controversial figures
...Black Lives Matter..we only see looting.
..Black leaders...they only show us Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson

They only show us what they want to show us and really control us by omission (they don't show us the real stuff)

originally posted by: Speedtek
What happened to debate and delving into an idea of a conspiracy? This is 100% what ATS is about. This is a perfect topic to delve into, do research, to find out if it really is a conspiracy, but no, 6 pages of people reply "NO" and "LIBTARD" - can we move past that and get back to actual discussion?

First, both sides have engaged in name calling. I try ti avoid it, but slip up sometimes too.

Secondly, I am all for discussing the conspiracy. Yet to me its seems the group or person putting out the conspiracy ought to provide some proof or evidence before a reasonable discussion can be had. I have yet to see anyone, including the CNN guest provide any evidence of this conspiracy that the rioters were paid right wingers.

In fact, to the opposite,on this thread and others I have provided example after example of the left doing these things in the recent past (and the night after at NYU), provided conservative speaker after speaker that have been censor on campuses through the use of violence, and even provided evidence that one of the masked protestors who was admitting beating trump supporters was an employye of UC Berkely.

I have also showed how the supposed "peaceful" protestors accepted instruction over and over again from the rioters to block streets so that stores could be looted, and then wildly cheered them on as it happened. They also chanted aggressive messages to the police when asked to leave.

None of these points has even been addressed by the people on the left or those pushing the conspiracy that these were right wing rioters.

In addition to this, I have asked if anyone can provide even one example of right wing people rioting or protesting to censor a liberal speaker on campus, and again not one person has responded.

So it appears that the people pushing this conspiracy are not interested in a serious discussion, and perhaps you should be criticizing them.

This is quite false actually

originally posted by: Speedtek
What happened to debate and delving into an idea of a conspiracy? This is 100% what ATS is about. This is a perfect topic to delve into, do research, to find out if it really is a conspiracy, but no, 6 pages of people reply "NO" and "LIBTARD" - can we move past that and get back to actual discussion?

Thank you. If the shoe was on the other foot they'd all be screaming 'PAID SHILLS' and 'OMG SOROS'. But now it's left wing riots, ALL liberals are violent rioters and there is NO WAY someone as lovely and respectable as Bannon might have paid them.

This site can be utterly ridiculous sometimes.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: fencesitter85

In their defense, the people supporting Trump are generally understood to be 'lesser educated'.

Yep!

You and fencesitter really sowed us conservatives by providing absolutely no evidence and ignoring every point that I raised on the issue! Shame you can't respond to my "less educated" points.

And you don't see the irony of claiming conservatives just call names while doing the exact same things yourselves.

And BLM terrorists are actually KKK provocateurs.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: fencesitter85

In their defense, the people supporting Trump are generally understood to be 'lesser educated'.

Seeing that over 55% of White females voted for Trump, your statement is very bigoted, racist, and sexist.

You will not divide us.

originally posted by: DrStevenBrule

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: fencesitter85

In their defense, the people supporting Trump are generally understood to be 'lesser educated'.

Seeing that over 55% of White females voted for Trump, your statement is very bigoted, racist, and sexist.

You will not divide us.

Lol... I won't divide you. Lol... shouldn't you be attending a vigil for the Bowling Green Massacre victims?