It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: WhateverYouSay
Cant see why considering the Chinese, who would inevitability field far superior numbers, still don't have the capability of mounting any full scale invasion of the USA.
Maybe what he meant to say is that a US invasion/incursion on to Chinese foreign soil is an inevitability?
well one reason is that even with those numbers there is a large gun owning population in the US. so lets say half the us population has some guns thats 160 million armed people they would have to control.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: WhateverYouSay
Also the USA and south Korea may take the oppunity to take out North Korea.
edit on 3-2-2017 by Dem0nc1eaner because: (no reason given)
I don`t remember that trump ever ran on the platform of the "peaceful alternative"
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner
They cannot even properly accommodate the population they have enslaved never mind mount a full scale incursion 1000s of miles away.
No much chance of them invading anyone other than South Korea, which would not end well for ether side i imagine.
But i don't think there would be much left of the North Korean forces afterwards.
originally posted by: carewemust
Why so much China-vs-USA war drum beating this month?
Nov-Dec 2016, it was USA-vs-Russia
Which country will be the "hot" fear topic in March? Iran? North Korea?