President Trump Dominates Anti American Media

a reply to: uncommitted

No one controls my mind but me. No one tells me what to do. If they tried, i would shove their gonads down their throat. If they have no gonads, well, i'd improvise.

originally posted by: LuXTeN
a reply to: uncommitted

No one controls my mind but me. No one tells me what to do. If they tried, i would shove their gonads down their throat. If they have no gonads, well, i'd improvise.

Of course you think that, and quite right too. If you didn't think that then they wouldn't have done the mind controlling correctly, would they?

originally posted by: The GUT

originally posted by: uncommitted
Wow, and I was hoping you were being sarcastic. I think Trumps sleight of hand hypnosis is working well on so many of his subjects.

Let me ask you a question: Do you think the Globalist philosophy is a good thing or a bad thing? For this question it matters not whether Donald & Crew are anti-globalism and/or are just pawns of globalism at this point.

Interesting question, but one that is being viewed at a rather black and white level. Is isolationism a good or bad thing? Is it better to be part of the solution or to try and create a solution that works for you but nobody else?

I'm going to go for the Websters definition of globalism -

the policy or doctrine of involving one's country in international affairs, alliances, etc.

www.thefreedictionary.com...

Would you like to tell me what you think is actually a bad thing in that?

a reply to: uncommitted

The world could use a little break from us dont'cha think when it comes to nation toppling and throwing our weight around. So, from that aspect, a little "Isolationism" would probably be welcomed by folk worldwide. Wouldn't you agree?

Using all these "-ism's" & "-ists" as a slam, however, is part of the jedi mind-effing from the deep state and its media minions---I'm hoping you have perceived that? THAT'S certainly black & white thinking for sure.

Webster won't do for the definition of Globalism in the way, say, that a committed member of the Council On Foreign Relations sees it. I know it sounds good on paper, but are you really as unfamiliar with the topic in this context as you seem to be or are you just being coy? (Search terms: WTO, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, and the Group of Eight (G8))

I'm looking for common ground because I see unique potential right now if we just all pulled together over ONE very important thing.

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: uncommitted

The world could use a little break from us dont'cha think when it comes to nation toppling and throwing our weight around. So, from that aspect, a little "Isolationism" would probably be welcomed by folk worldwide. Wouldn't you agree?

Using all these "-ism's" & "-ists" as a slam, however, is part of the jedi mind-effing from the deep state and its media minions---I'm hoping you have perceived that? THAT'S certainly black & white thinking for sure.

Webster won't do for the definition of Globalism in the way, say, that a committed member of the Council On Foreign Relations sees it. I know it sounds good on paper, but are you really as unfamiliar with the topic in this context as you seem to be or are you just being coy? (Search terms: WTO, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, and the Group of Eight (G8))

I'm looking for common ground because I see unique potential right now if we just all pulled together over ONE very important thing.

I'm familiar with those terms, but thanks, I wasn't thinking of populist ways of looking at a word but what it's real definition is - often the two are very far apart.

I agree with you though that maybe the world does need a bit of a breather................... the fact Trump says Iran has been 'put on notice' and his views on why Brexit is a good thing for the UK suggest he isn't looking to stop having a view on things that if he was moving away from globalism he wouldn't be so vocal about. If Iran is a threat to any country it's Israel which as far as I'm aware has only become an American colony in name only under any US Republican government and Brexit isn't something he could really give any considered opinion on as at the moment it's not begun in earnest.

So, I guess the end result is if the US is going to take a step away from globalism then put your money where your mouth is and shut up about things that aren't in your purview.

Still not sure what that's got to do with the jedi mind tricks that have so hypnotised Trump supporters though.

What garbage.

a reply to: The GUT

I guess your right many Americans are tired of being the world police. You end up spending huge amounts of money trying to defend this group or stop the killing only to have both groups on the end hate you. What's really the point bush and Obama created a lot of enemies with deploying troops and drone strikes. And yet things haven't changed even top long dictators only made things worse.

I'd like to see our military recalled from many areas of the globe and let those countries defend themselves for a change. Like why do we still have troops in Germany defending their country? Time to pay for your own military.