It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Defending my liberal principles has become a conservative position.
I see on social media people using the phrase regressive left a bit less lately, and replacing it with terms like Bigoteer, Control Left, or Illiberal left. Whatever name you use for this well meaning, but painfully misguided set of ideals is largely irrelevant. We need to identify this backwards idea that puts groups before people, and sometimes you need a label to get people to understand an idea.
The only thing that can replace the regressive descent of the left is on a return to true Liberalism. A liberalism which defends free speech and expression, a Liberalism that is for liberty and right of the individual, and most importantly a Liberalism that is one for human liberty.
I truly believe the regressive ideology to be the biggest threat to freedom and western civilization that exists today. With the rise of Trump and constant comparisons they make to Hitler, the Left now has their perfect bogey man to use to excuse anything. If your opponent is a vile racist you can use violence and any means necessary to stop him.
The regressive/control/liberal left is a group of people who place identity, usually based on immutable characteristics in a pecking order of social importance, such as race gender and religion where victimhood is the highest virtue to be had. This oppression Olympics allows for groups to compete for who is the most oppressed, thus the most virtuous. And if someone isn't as oppressed as you, then you have full authority to oppress them accordingly. So Black Lives Matter can protest a gay rights march in Toronto, and a white gay man can be banned from leading a collage LGBT organizations, Pro-Life women can be kicked out of a woman's rights march's and so on.
This backwards ideology demands we judge one another not by the content of our character but by the color of our skin, or some other baked in trait, puts the collective ahead of the individual. It loves all of it's minority groups to behave as monoliths, so if you're a true individual, meaning you don't subscribe to the idea that the group think attributed to you based on those immutable characteristics, you must be cast out.
The individual must be sacrificed at the alter of the collective.
If we can't reign in this madness on the left Donald Trump will be all to happy to show them his authoritarian side.
If you're a Liberal is there anything Left on the Left or are you Left out?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JAY1980
I consider myself Classical Liberal.
Yet I'm often painted as a conservative because I disagree with those who embrace a more severe leftist ideology.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JAY1980
I consider myself Classical Liberal.
Yet I'm often painted as a conservative because I disagree with those who embrace a more severe leftist ideology.
Real liberalism does not have a mandate on how to talk. Real liberalism is free speech. Talk and listen is real liberalism. What we have today is none of that. Real liberalism tolerates language they prefer not to hear in hopes the people who feel they have to talk that way no longer do. And they stop. And everybodies happy. Not this crap we have today. It might have started with good liberal intentions but has become entirely non liberal.
Liberal Coastal Elites and that they are becoming a problem by promoting political correctness
originally posted by: Wookiep
Good job OP. For a least showing a shred of sanity might actually exist on the left, still. Maybe?
originally posted by: Wookiep
This guy has some pretty good videos. He really seems as genuine as you can be right now considering the current climate.