It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Trump, who made dismantling the Paris agreement a central part of his campaign message, does not intend to directly target the agreement, but instead will reduce U.N. funding, according to a Wednesday report by The News York Times.
Recent reports show 200 countries have reaffirmed pledges to comply with the Paris deal, which aims to keep so-called global warming below 2 degrees Celsius.
“[F]rom what we’ve seen the [executive order] does not mention the Paris Agreement directly, but rather that would be reviewed by default if in fact all multilateral treaties are to be reviewed,” Rhys Gerholdt, a spokesman for the environmental think tank World Resources Institute, told reporters shortly after TheNYT’s report was published.
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: D8Tee
How does the money help keep the temperature down exactly? Is it all used for green energy development? Or just....money..?
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: D8Tee
How does the money help keep the temperature down exactly? Is it all used for green energy development? Or just....money..?
Obviously research and development.
Also obvious, people comment without reading the link.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: D8Tee
How does the money help keep the temperature down exactly? Is it all used for green energy development? Or just....money..?
Obviously research and development.
Also obvious, people comment without reading the link.
Research and Development can be funded by the private sector like any task worth doing. I would encourage them to hit up Al Gore and DiCaprio for funding...I hear they are really excited about this.
How does the money help keep the temperature down exactly? Is it all used for green energy development? Or just....money..?
"The Green Climate Fund will support projects, programmes, policies and other activities in developing country Parties using thematic funding windows".[1] It is intended to be the centrepiece of efforts to raise Climate Finance of $100 billion a year by 2020. This is not an official figure for the size of the Fund itself, however. Disputes also remain as to whether the funding target will be based on public sources, or whether "leveraged" private finance will be counted towards the total.[2] A total of US$10.3 billion has been pledged so far, which is meant to cover investments over a four year period. Only a fraction of this sum had been pledged as of July 2013, mostly to cover start-up costs.[3
At its board meeting in South Korea held in March 2015, the GCF refused an explicit ban on fossil fuel projects. Japan, China, and Saudi Arabia opposed the ban. "It's like a torture convention that doesn't forbid torture", Karen Orenstein, a campaigner for Friends of the Earth US who attended the meeting told the Guardian. "Honestly it should be a no-brainer at this point"
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: reldra
Also obvious some people are busy. What are questions not permitted? Seriously grow up. Learn that sometimes people can not read the link. It isn't obvious though since money seems to be wasted quite commonly.
Regardless, great news.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: D8Tee
I am loving my President so far.
originally posted by: 727Sky
a reply to: D8Tee
Not only are we going to stop being the world's broke policeman but it would appear we are also going to stop being the worlds sugar daddy.
A roll you as a nation took on to control the worlds finances and politics
It was a self serving policy
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: D8Tee
How does the money help keep the temperature down exactly? Is it all used for green energy development? Or just....money..?