It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Up to now, Trudeau has had a relatively smooth ride guiding Canada's relations with the U.S., thanks to being so simpatico with Barack Obama -- natural allies on climate change, with a close personal relationship that oozed brotherly affection.
So far, the Liberals have taken a wise approach in reaching out to the Trump's transition team, "in order to begin conveying the importance of our economic partnership and the American interest in maintaining it," said Roland Paris, Trudeau's former foreign policy adviser. But now the real work starts with Trump taking over the White House.
“It’s very clear to myself when I speak to business leaders here in Davos, when I met with automotive executives and business leaders in Detroit, having open borders benefits both Canada and the U.S.”
Trump’s spokesman recently stoked fears when he said Canada’s automotive sector may not be spared from a border tax.
(Former Canadian Prime Minister) Harper called Trump “a candidate without precedent in American history” who rejects the long-held notion that “America alone must accept overarching responsibility for global affairs.”
Harper said many in the world may not like this inward foreign policy shift, which will focus on narrowly defined U.S. economic interests.
...“It will work with friends and allies on shared interests, but only when such friends and allies are prepared to bring real assets to the table,” he said. “That, by the way, is going to apply first and foremost to Europe.”
www.newcoldwar.org... She was sanctioned by Russia prior to Trudeau making her foreign minster .Cant sit at the table if you are not allowed in the room . John Helmer, has a good bio on her .
MOSCOW – Chrystia Freeland, a leading figure in the Ukrainian and Canadian campaigns against Russia, was promoted last week in Ottawa to become Canada’s foreign minister. She is now one step away in her plan to replace Justin Trudeau as prime minister, sources in Ottawa, Washington, and Moscow report.
johnhelmer.net...-17016
Chrystia Freeland (lead image), appointed last week to be the new Canadian Foreign Minister, claims that her maternal family were the Ukrainian victims of Russian persecution, who fled their home in 1939, after Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin agreed on a non-aggression pact and the division of Poland between Germany and the Soviet Union. She claims her mother was born in a camp for refugees before finding safe haven in Alberta, Canada. Freeland is lying.
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
There is a price to pay for making the majority feel like, and treating it like a disenfranchised minority, and the Canadian political establishment, along with that of many other western nations is about to find out just how high that price is.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: mobiusmale
eta...and OP please do not make Kevin O'leary a kind of Trump equivalent . I think Canad can and must do better the KO .
I don't think you will see that ..Too much bad taste of the Harper years and besides Canada is more of a middle of the Road . Justin got in because it was a kind of protest vote . The right has a decent base but not one that can swing the majority their way , at least not for awhile . Alberta provincially is a kind of wake up call for the right nationally.
It will be cool to watch Canada swing back hard to the right next election.
But Trudeau is going to need to understand that, under the Trump Administration, Canada is going to have to trade on the basis of equal value/opportunity - not expect to be handed sweetheart deals just because we have always been friends and neighbours.
originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: Slickinfinity
Additionally, the Trans Mountain Pipeline will be built and will be exporting oil to China, so we will have lucrative trading partners other than the Americans. Also, 9 million American jobs depend on Canadian oil exports, so who will have the upper hand in the trade talks?
Seeing the whole premise on CO2 is to address temperatures and climate change the results could be quantified . How does BC make the claim of success ?
It seems there has been a carbon tax in B.C. for some time now and it is a success.
Diana Daunheimer • 20 days ago A fact is something that truly exists or happens and making a factual statement requires evidence. The facts stated here not only have not occurred, they do not have the proper evidence to support them. Fact #1: The Carbon Tax will cost 60% nothing at all. This "fact" is not supported by evidence. The Bill 20 Fuel Tax only began on Jan 1, 2017. Is there data to support this statement? No. To further, one must submit their tax returns to receive a rebate. Has everyone entitled to a rebate done so? Likely not. As well, it is obvious there will be externalized costs to this tax, school districts, municipalities, charities, transit, provincial air travel, all businesses will be passing on the tax to consumers. To suggest that the populous will not feel the burden of increased costing in numerous facets of every day life is defying all economic logic.
Fact #2: All money raised by the Carbon Tax will stay in Alberta. Is that so? Where is the evidence? If the Government of Alberta signs a contract with a multinational company to install renewable energy, or implement CCS, using Bill 20 fuel taxes, does all the money stay in Alberta?.....
Fact #3: Taxing carbon is not a new idea. Perhaps, but taxing fuel, and using it for a non-revenue neutral program is, which is what Bill 20 does. It is not a carbon tax, as carbon is not being taxed, fuel is, and the revenue can be used for general operations. This is a sales tax, guised as environmental policy. .....
Fact #4: There's no time like the present. For what? To fail on emissions reductions? There is no mandate in Bill 20 to reduce emissions and no qualifying or quantifying measures to ensure the Act achieves its advertised purpose, reducing emissions and mitigating climate change.
Fact #5: The Carbon Tax will not unfairly harm industry. It won't harm industry at all. Read Bill 20. It has numerous direct exemptions for the oil and gas industry. .....
To further, numerous truths were omitted from the discussion, such as Bill 20 enshrining warrantless search and seizure on Albertans, industry exemptions from the fuel tax and the utter failure of the Act to address actual reduction of emissions. Here are links to the legislation and MRR, where the exemptions and other factual details can be verified. www.assembly.ab.ca... www.energy.alberta.ca...
originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: tothetenthpower
I am on the fence with Kevin but if we end up needing a fiscally charged hard a**, he's the guy.
Fact #1: The Carbon Tax will cost 60% nothing at all. This "fact" is not supported by evidence. The Bill 20 Fuel Tax only began on Jan 1, 2017. Is there data to support this statement? No. To further, one must submit their tax returns to receive a rebate. Has everyone entitled to a rebate done so? Likely not. As well, it is obvious there will be externalized costs to this tax, school districts, municipalities, charities, transit, provincial air travel, all businesses will be passing on the tax to consumers. To suggest that the populous will not feel the burden of increased costing in numerous facets of every day life is defying all economic logic.
Fact #2: All money raised by the Carbon Tax will stay in Alberta. Is that so? Where is the evidence? If the Government of Alberta signs a contract with a multinational company to install renewable energy, or implement CCS, using Bill 20 fuel taxes, does all the money stay in Alberta?.....
Fact #3: Taxing carbon is not a new idea. Perhaps, but taxing fuel, and using it for a non-revenue neutral program is, which is what Bill 20 does. It is not a carbon tax, as carbon is not being taxed, fuel is, and the revenue can be used for general operations. This is a sales tax, guised as environmental policy. .....
Fact #4: There's no time like the present. For what? To fail on emissions reductions? There is no mandate in Bill 20 to reduce emissions and no qualifying or quantifying measures to ensure the Act achieves its advertised purpose, reducing emissions and mitigating climate change.
Fact #5: The Carbon Tax will not unfairly harm industry. It won't harm industry at all. Read Bill 20. It has numerous direct exemptions for the oil and gas industry. .....
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
We'll be just fine - Trudeau doesn't have to change a thing, other than to take a hard stance FOR Canadian values and policies and not let himself be bullied by a Trump admin.