H.R. 193- Bill To end membership of the United States in the United Nations

a reply to: Aazadan

NO ONE is pulling OUT OF NATO.

originally posted by: TrueAmerican
a reply to: Britguy

I don't think Israel has too much to worry about with Trump at the helm, even if we did withdraw.

But seeing further down the road, this could also affect things like trade agreements, and the NPT. Of course, Israel was never too keen on the NPT anyways, now were they...

This also Includes the GENEVA CONVENTIONS correct? Hot dawg time to torture and assassinate again. lol(im kidding)

Anyway this will lead to another League of nations that only follow western ideals.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Now the IMF I can get behind, it shouldn't even exist, nor the Federal Reserve, the world should be rid of debt completely as it is ridiculous.

At work today I was talking to a colleague regards student debt, over here you don't pay back your loan until you earn enough.

But what if you never do earn enough (and it can happen) where did the money come from to lend to the student in the first place?

a reply to: BlueAjah


thanks for that, appreciate It.

I get this wasn't Donalds hand writing this bill but I'm very confident this was started on day 1 of his presidency because of his presidency.

This doesnt seem to be getting the media attention it feels like it should be.

It feels like the league of nations and the Nazi's for some reason.

originally posted by: Lolliek
If we lost Governor Haley for nothing, I'm gonna be pissed.

Now we'll have McMaster (booooo).

I don't envy her position- even if she's the UN Ambassador for the next 2 years, Trump has made her job infinitely harder.

Haley didnt do nothing but bend over and remove the Flag.

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
a reply to: BlueAjah


thanks for that, appreciate It.

I get this wasn't Donalds hand writing this bill but I'm very confident this was started on day 1 of his presidency because of his presidency.

This doesnt seem to be getting the media attention it feels like it should be.

It feels like the league of nations and the Nazi's for some reason.

It was not started on day one of Trump's presidency.
It was submitted on Jan. 3, and they probably started drafting it before that.
Trump did not become president until Jan 20th.

They might have been considering submitting it for a long time, but knew it would get nowhere under Obama.
They may have pushed it through pending Trump because they believe Trump might sign it.

originally posted by: solargeddon
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Now the IMF I can get behind, it shouldn't even exist, nor the Federal Reserve, the world should be rid of debt completely as it is ridiculous.

At work today I was talking to a colleague regards student debt, over here you don't pay back your loan until you earn enough.

But what if you never do earn enough (and it can happen) where did the money come from to lend to the student in the first place?

From the increased lifetime income taxes of the people who did pay back their loans.

a reply to: TrueAmerican. Just think, after we pull out then no more of our money will go to all the globalist programs like depopulation and Bill Gates can go by himself with all of his vaccines. Then the American people won't make the karma of all the crazy stuff they are doing with our money. It would kill the Millenium Declaration and Agenda 21. It would kill all the insane treaties.

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Sorry guys but, has this been confirmed? was this a genuine bill?

Exactly what will it take for this bill to pass?

Pardon my ignorance on US specifics, but on day 1 did Trump really allow a bill into Congress to removed the USA from the UN in its entirety?

Were we correct all along that the UN is as corrupt and useless as we believed?
Or is this a massive right hook to remove the US From all international agreements on peace?

kinda concerned...

No Trump Would not have "allowed a bill into Congress" as that's not his job. We still have separation of powers. The bill has to pass in the legislative branch and then come to the President to either sign or veto. Also I'm not quite sure what you think is the Nazis or League of Nations but League of Nations was the prior incarnation of the UN and was started by the Rothschilds.

a reply to: uncommitted
First of all, Obama has been busy disarming us...like all good lefties want.... Second to rebuild are military does not mean we have to go to war.

Hath mine ears bewitched me with whispers of Xanadu?!?!

Could there be...hope?

a reply to: TrueAmerican

Did I get off the Trump Train and get on the win train? Or wait, could they, no way, could it be!? They are the same train?

a reply to: TrueAmerican

First of all, this is a dream come true for me as I despise the U.N. and all their bullcrap.

However, the best part of this would be the huge blow to the N.W.O. and a-holes like George Soros and other Globalists. I hope this passes and happens. What a huge win for "We the People".

Why is it the UN's job to run other countries? That's what I hear in essence with some comments that they help blah blah blah. Are other countries not able to run themselves? Wouldn't each nation work out it's own laws and treaties with others, work out their own trade deals in their own interests? Why have any UN group who can play bully to another nation by threatening economic or military might against them?

Washington warned us long ago about engaging in entangling alliances. America needs to focus inwardly for at least twenty to thirty years. End all immigration. Why should America be the foster parent to the world for people to run to because their country sucks? No more. Shut the borders, be isolationist for a while, rebuild our nation from the ground up, it might be an amazing thing to see. Treat ALL Americans as brothers and sisters regardless of color, creed, or political party. Just put US first for once in a hundred years, how about that?

We have been sucked dry, used, and for what? Everyone around the world seems to hate us, so let them sort themselves out
and we will fix home for now, at least twenty years. Is that too much too ask to put us first for twenty years?

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: BlueAjah

We can do that while we're in the UN though. And as members of the UN we have veto power. If we were to leave, and we wanted something in the UN vetoed (because we would still have to pay attention to what's going on there), we would have to rely on convincing another nation with veto power to do so.

Why?
Why should the US be telling other countries what to do?

Um.. because the Deep State (run by the guys that invented
the UN, like Rockefellers and for the Rothschilds) are telling
the US what to do anyway. When there's a lot of money to be
made and tossed around though, I've seen a lot of examples
of the US having a hard time defunding stupid... or worse.

The UN is the biggest government proxy ever set up.. for the
sake of rich guys. NATO's always been the strongarm-- but you
know we've always funded the lion's share of the job with our
money and young blood.

I said a couple of decades ago the most useful function that
gross phallic symbol could perform: would be to saw it off the end
of Manhattan, drag it out to the Gulf and use it for target practice
by the Fifth Fleet. Hey it might even impress the neighbors...

Consequently, this is either some back room deal to get rid of
a couple of internal trouble makers; or else a couple of trouble
makers just made some rich, quite powerful enemies.

Trump's general isolationist attitude, in light of the nice cooked
up feuds with the CIA and media, is starting to make me think he's
one of the latter variety of described individuals.
MSM=Mockingbird=intel community... check.
It wouldn't be too easy for me to tell by now which covert clan
is more bloodthirsty and deadly-- CIA/Mossad/MI6. Really doesn't
matter as long as the paychecks are all drawn on the same bank.

Just another layer of disenfranchisement for the peeps. I say
LOSE 'em. They're as useful to me as mammarys on a tortoise.

originally posted by: solargeddon

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: solargeddon

I don't feel "repressed" by the UN, quite the contrary!

They're irrelevant!

Completely irrelevant!

So, there's that.

Although back in the 1940's the UN was thought to have relevance....to prevent a further world war ever.

So there's that.

Yeah, and in the 77 years following that there was...
-Korea
-Cuba
-Laos
-Viet Nam
-Suez
-Congo
-Rhodesia
-Dominican Republic
-Lebanon
-Arab-Israeli
-Cambodia
-Phillipines
-Ethiopia
-Angola
-Lebanon
-Uganda
-Chad
-Iran-Iraq
-Falklands
-Grenada
-Panama
-Kuwait
-Somalia
-Haiti
-Russia (Afghanistan)
-Bosnia
-Kosovo
-Ass-krackistan
-Iraq

...not to mention about 200 others. As we can see, the UN has done a bang-up job maintaining World peace in those 77 years, huh?

So, there's that.

The US pays over 22% of the entire UN annual budget, more than 2x as much as the #2 contributor, Japan.

Time to pull the plug! Time to de-fund the UN.

OR...here's an even better idea...

How about the US spearhead's a binding UN resolution to relocate the UN headquarters to Pyongyang, North Korea.

This Bill has been put forward every year for the past 20 years.

It's nothing new.

a reply to: neformore

WANNA bet?
Oh wait I forgot YOU people NEVER had honor to back up your crap.
YOU on that ISLAND bitching like YOU have a voice here?
Meh

a reply to: TrueAmerican

Let's hope it happens, it's time to leave that defunct organization.