The Protest By Women is Too Huge to Dismiss as a One Hit Wonder.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Tardacus

That`s not up to Trump that`s congresses territory

Right.
When's the next election?

Speaking of that..WOMEN were severely disappointed by the first two years of Obama's Presidency. They demonstrated it by handing over a ton of nationwide Democratic offices to Republicans. I think that's when President Obama said that he was "humbled by the shellacking"..or something to that effect.

Source-1: www.foxnews.com...

Source-2: en.wikipedia.org...

Let's hope that Donald Trump's decisions and policies during his first 2 years lifts ALL AMERICANS, as he is promising. That will save HIM from a 2020 shellacking by female voters.

a reply to: UKTruth

It depends on how well the Trump administration does.

No. It depends upon voters.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Throes

Sure you have. So have I. But never once upon hearing someone say that did I think to myself, "Now there's a guy who'd make a good President."

I hear people say stupid sh*t daily. That doesn't somehow mean it's not stupid sh*t when they say it however. It is. It's always been stupid sh*t and will be again when the next guy says it too.

I won't start thinking that any of them are President Material the more they say it though.

And like I said earlier, there have been way worse things done by prior Presidents. Clinton (cigars, oral sex with an intern) LBJ showing off his penis whenever he could, JFK having affairs with a ton of women..

So this must be a new age we are in. The age where Men aren't expected to talk and act like men. Well, at least not in the public eye.

a reply to: carewemust

What I find amusing is two-fold:

1. The Main Stream Media is implying that this protest is motivated by Donald Trump.
2. Those protesting and supporting WMoW are not concerned about correcting this MSM false narrative - if we are to take their 'guiding vision and definition of principles' at face value.

Even blind Freddy can see what is going on here - it's not enough that they've pitted minorities against majority voters, they are now arrogantly subtly announcing that they represent all women, especially wash-up singers who want to bomb the White House - their own 'vision' includes giving a platform to the racist hate group BLM.

IMO, it's an incoherent toothless tiger of a movement with lots of hot air and no solutions (aside from getting rid of Trump, that's their 'final solution')

Womens March on Washington

a reply to: Throes

Me too. If it came from other workers it was easier to fend off. If it came from a boss, you had to deal with it more tactfully. 🙄
It also seems to diminish a little with each new generation, it used to be worse. Or maybe it was just more in the open, more verbalized, more grabby.

It's an uncomfortable environment to work in. Especially if you needed the job, and you have to be both tactful and blunt with a boss......

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Throes

I've heard this type of talk a thousand times.

I haven't. Except from adolescents.

I can walk in any bar in a 100 mile radius and hear it

Well that right there reaffirms my reason for never going to bars. Pigs need their grimy cesspits to bump chests in.

Like I said earlier, I've heard it in every single working environment as well. Retail, construction, governmental, and Professional. Every single one. Maybe most men are afraid to admit it, but I'm not. Usually it's the elder men, too.

I assume you're saying that elder men are "bolder". That only leads me point out that hey, check it out! As the generations aged & the youngins got older, that s# became not awesome anymore.

No, it was more of a ..wow, I guess Men don't really stop having these types of conversations ever moment..

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UKTruth

It depends on how well the Trump administration does.

No. It depends upon voters.

Well yes, fair enough.
Trumps performance is going to be a bigger factor than 2017 protests in liberal cities.

originally posted by: snowspirit
a reply to: Throes

Me too. If it came from other workers it was easier to fend off. If it came from a boss, you had to deal with it more tactfully. 🙄
It also seems to diminish a little with each new generation, it used to be worse. Or maybe it was just more in the open, more verbalized, more grabby.

It's an uncomfortable environment to work in. Especially if you needed the job, and you have to be both tactful and blunt with a boss......

Yeah, I hear you there. I had a female Project Manager text me all kinds of nasty things and illicit photos. You do have to do quite the tight rope dance.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Watch it, this isn't the mudpit hahahah

But since you represent "the right ideology", you owe it to people to call them names and disregard their right to an opinion because it's wrong.

But if anyone questions what you say you flip out and call names and act like they're scum.

a reply to: UKTruth

Trumps performance is going to be a bigger factor than 2017 protests in liberal cities.

Liberal cities. Okey.

The House and Senate members are probably more interested in the demonstrations than Trump is. But yeah, Trump could change some minds. Or not.

a reply to: Throes

Maybe it is a new age.

But somehow I've never understood how doing those things makes someone a "Man". Cheating on your wife and breaking your promise to the person you claim to love the most. Whipping your d*ck out for everyone to see and act like some child or monkey for people while you laugh at your genitals.

Is that how men act in your opinion??? Is that how Men who we want in charge of our lives should be acting??? Does that make sense to you honestly???

Because maybe you're right. If that's what made a Man in the past, maybe times have changed and some of us have set the bar higher than they did in the past. But you know what, I'm totally ok with that. Because I don't really want some knuckle dragging antiquated imbecile who still thinks his own d*ck and balls are entertainment to be in charge of my Government and my life. I'm not saying they can't exist. But they shouldn't be running sh*t of any importance.

Does that make sense??

a reply to: Sublimecraft


Like mOjOm said, Donald Trump's ability to get things done, gives the women HOPE, which is why they are choosing to voice their wishes on such a large scale, at this time... rather than 2, 5, 10 years ago.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Throes

Maybe it is a new age.

But somehow I've never understood how doing those things makes someone a "Man". Cheating on your wife and breaking your promise to the person you claim to love the most. Whipping your d*ck out for everyone to see and act like some child or monkey for people while you laugh at your genitals.

Is that how men act in your opinion??? Is that how Men who we want in charge of our lives should be acting??? Does that make sense to you honestly???

Because maybe you're right. If that's what made a Man in the past, maybe times have changed and some of us have set the bar higher than they did in the past. But you know what, I'm totally ok with that. Because I don't really want some knuckle dragging antiquated imbecile who still thinks his own d*ck and balls are entertainment to be in charge of my Government and my life. I'm not saying they can't exist. But they shouldn't be running sh*t of any importance.

Does that make sense??

I get your points. However, on three separate occasions I've personally been grabbed by women while they came on to me. Every time I thought to myself I'd be in jail if I ever did anything remotely close to that! So I personally don't see it as just a man thing any longer..

Maybe it's just my own personal experience that makes me think this way. That's it's just human nature and we all need to stop being so PC and get over it.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Throes

Maybe it is a new age.

But somehow I've never understood how doing those things makes someone a "Man". Cheating on your wife and breaking your promise to the person you claim to love the most. Whipping your d*ck out for everyone to see and act like some child or monkey for people while you laugh at your genitals.

Is that how men act in your opinion??? Is that how Men who we want in charge of our lives should be acting??? Does that make sense to you honestly???

Because maybe you're right. If that's what made a Man in the past, maybe times have changed and some of us have set the bar higher than they did in the past. But you know what, I'm totally ok with that. Because I don't really want some knuckle dragging antiquated imbecile who still thinks his own d*ck and balls are entertainment to be in charge of my Government and my life. I'm not saying they can't exist. But they shouldn't be running sh*t of any importance.

Does that make sense??

Exactly it doesn't make it alright because men have done it in the past and it's a supposed men's way of acting. In reality, those men exposing themselves(outside of the DC elite anyway) will end up in jail and registered sex offenders.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Sublimecraft


Like mOjOm said, Donald Trump's ability to get things done, gives the women HOPE, which is why they are choosing to voice their wishes on such a large scale, at this time... rather than 2, 5, 10 years ago.

No that isn't at all what I said. That's what you've decided to believe though, but that's all on you. You'd have to be pretty bad at reading comprehension to think I ever said that.

originally posted by: dreamingawake

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Throes

Maybe it is a new age.

But somehow I've never understood how doing those things makes someone a "Man". Cheating on your wife and breaking your promise to the person you claim to love the most. Whipping your d*ck out for everyone to see and act like some child or monkey for people while you laugh at your genitals.

Is that how men act in your opinion??? Is that how Men who we want in charge of our lives should be acting??? Does that make sense to you honestly???

Because maybe you're right. If that's what made a Man in the past, maybe times have changed and some of us have set the bar higher than they did in the past. But you know what, I'm totally ok with that. Because I don't really want some knuckle dragging antiquated imbecile who still thinks his own d*ck and balls are entertainment to be in charge of my Government and my life. I'm not saying they can't exist. But they shouldn't be running sh*t of any importance.

Does that make sense??

Exactly it doesn't make it alright because men have done it in the past and it's a supposed men's way of acting. In reality, those men exposing themselves(outside of the DC elite anyway) will end up in jail and registered sex offenders.

Well that was a President....so yes, I suppose LBJ would be registered in today's world.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Yeah that's what it was about.

That's why they were wearing pussy hats I guess?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UKTruth

Trumps performance is going to be a bigger factor than 2017 protests in liberal cities.

Liberal cities. Okey.

The House and Senate members are probably more interested in the demonstrations than Trump is.

Trumps performance will be a major factor in the Senate and House races.

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: dreamingawake

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Throes

Maybe it is a new age.

But somehow I've never understood how doing those things makes someone a "Man". Cheating on your wife and breaking your promise to the person you claim to love the most. Whipping your d*ck out for everyone to see and act like some child or monkey for people while you laugh at your genitals.

Is that how men act in your opinion??? Is that how Men who we want in charge of our lives should be acting??? Does that make sense to you honestly???

Because maybe you're right. If that's what made a Man in the past, maybe times have changed and some of us have set the bar higher than they did in the past. But you know what, I'm totally ok with that. Because I don't really want some knuckle dragging antiquated imbecile who still thinks his own d*ck and balls are entertainment to be in charge of my Government and my life. I'm not saying they can't exist. But they shouldn't be running sh*t of any importance.

Does that make sense??

Exactly it doesn't make it alright because men have done it in the past and it's a supposed men's way of acting. In reality, those men exposing themselves(outside of the DC elite anyway) will end up in jail and registered sex offenders.

Well that was a President....so yes, I suppose LBJ would be registered in today's world.

As would a woman doing the same.

There's a difference between sexual advances where both consenting adult parties allow it and sexual assault-rape and molestation. Yes, men are sexually abused as well.

"Today's world" was concerning to hear. Cue in that thread about setting clocks back 300 years.

a reply to: Throes

Women can assault men too. That is correct. It's not just a man thing. That doesn't make it ok though.

Just because you're used to it doesn't mean that it's ok either.

If someone grabbed your mother by the p*ssy every day when she went to work would you be ok with it too??? Or your wife was assaulted by her boss would you be like, "Ah that's cool because some chicks at a bar grabbed me one night too so it's not big deal."

It's not about being PC. That is a BS way of dismissing something as insignificant when it's not.