It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: poncho1982
a reply to: LordAhriman
No, they can use their first amendment rights all they want!
So can we!
I've not seen anyone say they shouldn't be able to do it, just commenting on the absurdity of it all.
See how that works?
Admit this is a cryfest because a woman did not win like expected and socialist policies will not be enacted. World's biggest therapy session.
No I am not suggesting they are Trump fans. I am just correcting your false assertion that this march was due to Hillary losing the election.
The American Muslim woman believes Muslim communities should be free to use Sharia law within their communities - not that the whole country of non-Muslims must have Sharia law.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
What changes nations are very large groups of angry people. And we proved on DAY ONE that we are a force to be reckoned with, beginning now.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Throes
And you can go live in a cave with Jane. The stock market and business seem to be doing great. Giving them more money to hide in foreign countries is a bad idea.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Matt11
The women who originally planned the march weren't really doing it because of Trump. They were doing it because of issues women face. That doesn't mean there weren't plenty of women there against Trump, but that wasn't the focus of the march originally.
What the organizers hope for is that the march will empower and inspire women (and men) to go back to their communities and work for the change they want to see.
Not such a horrible thing, is it?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Matt11
The women who originally planned the march weren't really doing it because of Trump. They were doing it because of issues women face. That doesn't mean there weren't plenty of women there against Trump, but that wasn't the focus of the march originally.
What the organizers hope for is that the march will empower and inspire women (and men) to go back to their communities and work for the change they want to see.
Not such a horrible thing, is it?
Really?
So they would have marched like this even if Hillary had been elected?
Please, tell me more about this and how angry they would have been.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: kaylaluv
Oh, great. That's all we need...the fundamental transformation of America. (sarcasm)
This American muslim woman says "being a muslim means being an activist".
Interpret that any way you want.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: kaylaluv
Oh, great. That's all we need...the fundamental transformation of America. (sarcasm)
This American muslim woman says "being a muslim means being an activist".
Interpret that any way you want.
Perhaps she means Sharia for all.