This is why I think Trump never conspired with Putin

It's too risky. No one would risk that. The Podesta emails are minor and they contained very little dirt. They are not even Hillary's emails. The MSM other than Fox News never covered the Podesta emails. Only Fox News covered them a little bit. They were mostly covered by Trump himself. Liberals and independents don't watch Fox News or Trump's rallies. Only Trump's own supports ever seen the Podesta emails. The Podesta emails had no effect on the election because liberals and independents didn't see Podesta's emails.

a reply to: JeremySun

Really???? Another opinion thread dedicated to kissing Trumps butt. That's the third one today. By a new member even.

You may want to try and hide some of that agenda bias there buddy. You're really giving yourself away here.

Gonna have to be more subtle in your misinformation next time Barron Von Putin.

The Chinese have a good saying. Ruo yao ren bu zhi guo bu jue, chu fei ji mo wei. If you don't want people or ghosts to know what you did, the only way is never do it in the first place.

Of course Trump would never risk it by conspiring with Putin. He could easily win the election all by himself.

a reply to: JeremySun

Americans have a good saying too, "Something around here doesn't smell right." Which means someone's not being honest and their story is Bullsh*t.

Sorta cuts right to the chase doesn't it??

Amazing. Your exuberance over victory comes under fire right off the bat.
Pay no attention to bitter losers.

Great points, newish member...and I agree with them.
Trump is great...and haters gonna hate.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: JeremySun

Americans have a good saying too, "Something around here doesn't smell right." Which means someone's not being honest and their story is Bullsh*t.

Sorta cuts right to the chase doesn't it??

Trump never takes a risk with anything. He didn't need Podesta's emails. He didn't collude with Putin. If he did, FBI would have found out.

a reply to: mOjOm

You may want to try and hide some of that agenda bias there buddy. You're really giving yourself away here.

You are an expert on agenda bias.

Maybe clean up your own house before giving someone else 'advice'.

a reply to: JeremySun

What possible collusion / conspiracy could Putin & Trump have engineered to covertly coerce 60+ million yanks and the EC to vote for Trump and exceed the 270 count respectively?

a) Was her loss due to Wikileaks, Breitbart, Podestra emails, Project Veritas, Russian hackers, Putin et al?
OR
b) Was her loss due to her being a dodgy liar who labelled half the country as deplorable and refused to do a press conference?

I'm going with 5% for 'a' and 95% for 'b'

a reply to: Metallicus

You kinda have to be around here don't ya think.

Everyone has a bias.

But not everyone, especially new members, make that many threads pushing the same exact message completely based on their opinions without doing it for a reason.

Making false statements such as:

Liberals and independents don't watch Fox News or Trump's rallies. Only Trump's own supports ever seen the Podesta emails. The Podesta emails had no effect on the election because liberals and independents didn't see Podesta's emails.

Is another big clue as well.

You should know the signs by now too. Rather than go after me I would have thought you'd strive for more honesty around here and notice these things yourself. Guess I have to do all on my own.

Personally, I think the whole Russian thing is backwards.

I say Trump has the goods on Putin.

Lots of recent actions point to this idea.

If Trump colluded with Putin in the election, US intelligence would have certainly found out. Not only would he not be POTUS, his family would also go bankrupt. It is not something Trump would have risked.

originally posted by: JeremySun

Trump never takes a risk with anything. He didn't need Podesta's emails. He didn't collude with Putin. If he did, FBI would have found out.

Really???

Tell that to everyone in Atlantic City who lost their money when he used to to buy too many casinos that all went bankrupt. Ask them if Trump ever takes a risk.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: JeremySun

What possible collusion / conspiracy could Putin & Trump have engineered to covertly coerce 60+ million yanks and the EC to vote for Trump and exceed the 270 count respectively?

a) Was her loss due to Wikileaks, Breitbart, Podestra emails, Project Veritas, Russian hackers, Putin et al?
OR
b) Was her loss due to her being a dodgy liar who labelled half the country as deplorable and refused to do a press conference?

I'm going with 5% for 'a' and 95% for 'b'

The same kind of collusion implanted in the minds of our youth in this country to pay an exorbitant price for an education to learn nothing worthy of getting gainful employment upon getting their diploma but an entitlement attitude to demand they shouldn't have to pay back their loans because they were suckered into learning nothing more than hating their own freedom and liberty by a bunch of cultural Marxist college professors who would make Hitler proud! *hell even I had to take a breath after that one*

Now that's entitlement! Yet, we wonder where we went wrong?

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: JeremySun

What possible collusion / conspiracy could Putin & Trump have engineered to covertly coerce 60+ million yanks and the EC to vote for Trump and exceed the 270 count respectively?

a) Was her loss due to Wikileaks, Breitbart, Podestra emails, Project Veritas, Russian hackers, Putin et al?
OR
b) Was her loss due to her being a dodgy liar who labelled half the country as deplorable and refused to do a press conference?

I'm going with 5% for 'a' and 95% for 'b'

For me it was b..

All she had to do was be like 35% more human and trump would have been steamrolled.

This has nothing to do with the Russians unless Hillary is a Russian asset.

a reply to: mOjOm

That is in the business world. US intelligence don't care what he does in the business world.

a reply to: JeremySun

You may have a good point.

CNN said this:

WATCH: CNN Claims It’s Illegal for Anyone But the Media to Read Clinton WikiLeaks Emails

a reply to: xuenchen

gawd I love how far the media reached to appear like an authority figure..

Like we got this little humans you are not allowed to see what daddy does..
(the media is part of government? Is that what they were saying?))

omg I never thought this day would come so soon..

AND they are outing themselves..

Like whaaa?

a reply to: JeremySun

You said he doesn't take risks which is wrong. He takes them all the time. That's what he does. He doesn't always win however so now he just takes them without risking himself personally.

You really think that's going to change??? No. It won't.

He'll risk the people of this country rather than himself though at the drop of a hat.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: JeremySun

You may have a good point.

CNN said this:

WATCH: CNN Claims It’s Illegal for Anyone But the Media to Read Clinton WikiLeaks Emails

CNN never read any Podesta email. Neither did MSNBC. Ergo, only Trump supporters seen Podesta emails and therefore Podesta emails had no effect because no one else seen them.

originally posted by: JeremySun


CNN never read any Podesta email. Neither did MSNBC. Ergo, only Trump supporters seen Podesta emails and therefore Podesta emails had no effect because no one else seen them.

well you have data on that?

I don't know many outside of ATS that know about any of this so you could be right, but my sample size is too small and unscientific, so I'm not calling those numbers.