Inauguration Demonstrators Admit They're 'Protesting the Peaceful Transition of Power'

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Because every time we send armed soldiers to a protest, BAD things happen.

So, you shouldn't shoot people burning cars / buildings, beating on cops / citizens, breaking windows and looting?

We just have to forgive them, they are just upset and misunderstood.

Here's a better article (from a newer thread) .... calling for violence !!

Protests will aim to disrupt Trump inauguration: organizers

Thousands of demonstrators are expected to turn out in Washington next week for protests aiming to "shut down" the inauguration of Donald Trump as the next U.S. president, organizers said on Thursday.

Protesters will attempt to close down 12 security checkpoints at the U.S. Capitol, where Trump will take the oath of office on Jan. 20, and along the 2.5-mile (4-km) parade route down Pennsylvania Avenue, according to leaders of a group called DisruptJ20.

"We want to shut down the inauguration," organizer David Thurston told a news conference. "We want to see a seething rebellion develop in this city and across the country."

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: gunshooter

good troll, keep it coming

Not a troll. A request.

Can you provide a quote where they said rioting was their intention?

not sensitive, just feel bad for you that's all

You feel bad that I support one's right to free speech and will not dismiss that right due to political partisanship?

because you don't know how to look at the bigger picture....

And what is that bigger picture?

never did I say one was quoted about starting a riot, looking at the bigger picture is seeing how paid agent provocateurs will be there leading the sheep through false propaganda to block a peaceful transition through blocking traffic, disrupting the parade however they can? sitting in the streets. Now, if you use a little patience and wisdom, and take a look at what all this will cause, you are out of your f******** mind to think this will be a civil peaceful protest. They surely aren't concerned for others safety with talks of being a resistance. You aren't supporting the right of free speech here, you are supporting disruption. The way they are going about this is not speech by stopping traffic. and you know there will be people mixed with the protestors inciting violence, and disruption/riot, hell, history has shown us that time and time again. believe what you want, but this is not peaceful protest if its done illegally.............

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: gunshooter

I am sure those that are there to cause chaos will never make it close to the inauguration site.

believe what you want..... good grief!
2

a reply to: xuenchen

It sounds like a very well planned attack to me, I am sure that those involved will never make it close to the areas they want to target.

I hope those that get caught will be jailed for a long time.

That is not even close to a "peaceful protest" definition at all.

originally posted by: Bramble Iceshimmer

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Because every time we send armed soldiers to a protest, BAD things happen.

So, you shouldn't shoot people burning cars / buildings, beating on cops / citizens, breaking windows and looting?

We just have to forgive them, they are just upset and misunderstood.

People doing that should be shot dead.

a reply to: gunshooter

never did I say one was quoted about starting a riot

So you just made the rioting stuff up?

looking at the bigger picture is seeing how paid agent provocateurs will be there leading the sheep through false propaganda to block a peaceful transition through blocking traffic, disrupting the parade however they can?

The event has not even occurred and you know there will be paid provocateurs?

Now, if you use a little patience and wisdom, and take a look at what all this will cause, you are out of your f******** mind to think this will be a civil peaceful protest.

It very well could be peaceful. Consitutional freedoms mandates we give them their right and the benefit of the doubt. Unless we have proof they are going to become violent, it is their right to peacefully protest.

You aren't supporting the right of free speech here, you are supporting disruption.

I've not said anything about supporting disruption or illegal activity.

You are making # up and trying to pass it off as an intelligent argument, but it's not. You are projecting your political partisanship and beliefs on to me.

a reply to: introvert

no, this group is into disruption...

What are you planning?

We’re planning a series of massive direct actions that will shut down the Inauguration ceremonies and any related celebrations–the Inaugural parade, the Inaugural balls, you name it. We’re also planning to paralyze the city itself, using blockades and marches to stop traffic and even public transit. And hey, because we like fun, we’re even going to throw some parties.

www.disruptj20.org...

And let's not forget the Democrats were already caught red-handed paying people to start violence at Trump rallies. I think they called it bird-dogging?

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Shamrock6

You are welcome to do whatever you want and feel whatever you want to feel, after all you do have freedom of speech and so do I.

Heyyyyy glad you understand that!

I'll pass on your permission to feel what I want, though. Your permission is neither wanted nor needed.

a reply to: TheBulk

and, I've already posted a video to this thread of a conservative trying to bribe liberal groups to be violent...

so, if the crap happens, what are we to believe??
personally, there's enough people with very strong feelings on both sides who are crazy enough to cause trouble for free...

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Shamrock6

I do, but do yous?? show me where in that 2 minute or so video that has been posted they are calling for violence.
because I posted a video on this thread with many more minutes where a conservative was trying to bribe people into being violent during trump's big day and everyone claimed that it was nothing!!
and it's much more obvious what they were saying!
what's good for the goose is good for the gander...
point me to the whole video of these idiots, or at least give me the spot on the video (time) where you hear them calling for violence.

disruption doesn't always mean violence. heck if half of the service workers in dc decided to call in sick that day, half the bus drivers and taxi drivers, ect.... it would be disurptive enough to practically shut it down!

Uh...I didn't say they called for violence.

I'll thank you in advance for not making snip up and then asking me to defend whatever you've concocted.

ETA - what's ironic about this is that my first comment in this thread, and subsequent comments, was in direct response to the notion of shutting down dissent and protest and how that's not okay. And now somehow you've made something up entirely and are trying to get me to defend it or explain it, when it's directly at odds to the very first comments I posted in this thread. The mental gymnastics is galling.

Anyone with half a brain will stay home and watch the riots on tv.

a reply to: dawnstar

If they do anything illegal, they should be dealt with accordingly. My point is that we should not automatically expect there to be "riots" when a protest is planned. It's a lazy tactic used by the Right to delegitimize the grievances of the vocal Left.

a reply to: DBCowboy
Somebody on ATS will probably link to a livestream.

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: DBCowboy
Somebody on ATS will probably link to a livestream.

Yeah, watch the blood shed from home.

Eat popcorn.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: dawnstar

If they do anything illegal, they should be dealt with accordingly. My point is that we should not automatically expect there to be "riots" when a protest is planned. It's a lazy tactic used by the Right to delegitimize the grievances of the vocal Left.

The only time you people ever protest is to protest Democrats political opposition. It's all fake just like the media that incites them.

They openly state they want to start a rebellion and disrupt the functioning of government. That is insurection. Off to prison with the organizers.

a reply to: TheBulk

The only time you people ever protest is to protest Democrats political opposition.

Who's "you people"? I'm not a democrat.

Also, isn't it their right to protest?

It's all fake just like the media that incites them.

Constitutional rights are now fake as well?

a reply to: TheBulk

The only time you people ever protest is to protest Democrats political opposition. It's all fake just like the media that incites them.

considering just how many times the conservatives have tried to link blm to all liberals like they are one in the same...
and what blm has been protesting for... I think your first statement is just bunk!

and, if you haven't figured it out now, just about everything has at least a tad bit of fake included in it now days, weather it's fake to lean left, or fake to lean right...
matter of fact, all the fake has left us at the point where we really wouldn't be able to know for sure just who paid for the violence if it does occur since both sides are now claiming to have proof that the other side has been involved in such activities.