It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Which part of Trump - and some of his supporters said and did the things that the media then reacted to have you missed, exactly?
If Donald Trump doesn't appear in a video mocking a disabled reporter, then the press can't report on him mocking a disabled reporter.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
If Donald Trump doesn't suggest that hispanics are all rapists, murderers and drug dealers, then the press can't report on it.
originally posted by: neformore
And with regards to "your side" (lol, like it isn't, because you're sure as hell making it seem that way), you have the luxury of being on the winning team, but lets face it the crap would have hit the fan in the other direction had Hilary won (yeah yeah, you'll say it wouldn't have but the ramped up "shes a criminal, lock her up, traitor, not fit to be president" screams civil disorder had she won) and the rash of hate crimes against minorities since Trumps victory doesn't exactly sit well, does it?
originally posted by: neformore
and the rash of hate crimes against minorities since Trumps victory doesn't exactly sit well, does it?
INSIDE THE INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT: WAR, PROPAGANDA, CLINTON & TRUMP
Propaganda is most effective when our consent is engineered by those with a fine education - Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Columbia -- and with careers on the BBC, the Guardian, the New York Times, the Washington Post. These organisations are known as the liberal media. They present themselves as enlightened, progressive tribunes of the moral zeitgeist. They are anti-racist, pro-feminist and pro-LGBT.
And they love war.
While they speak up for feminism, they support rapacious wars that deny the rights of countless women, including the right to life. In 2011, Libya, then a modern state, was destroyed on the pretext that Muammar Gaddafi was about to commit genocide on his own people. That was the incessant news; and there was no evidence. It was a lie.
So he was murdered with a knife in his rear by fanatics, backed by America, Britain and France. Hillary Clinton cheered his gruesome death for the camera, declaring, "We came, we saw, he died!" The destruction of Libya was a media triumph. As the war drums were beaten, Jonathan Freedland wrote in the Guardian: "Though the risks are very real, the case for intervention remains strong."
Intervention - what a polite, benign, Guardian word, whose real meaning, for Libya, was death and destruction.
According to its own records, Nato launched 9,700 "strike sorties" against Libya, of which more than a third were aimed at civilian targets. They included missiles with uranium warheads. Look at the photographs of the rubble of Misurata and Sirte, and the mass graves identified by the Red Cross. The Unicef report on the children killed says, "most [of them] under the age of ten".
This blog documented media bias and war propaganda on the Guardian website from January 2013 to August 2015.
I believe some writers displayed their own genuine opinions that were perhaps at odds with my own ideas.
I believe some writers probably worked for or with think tanks which influenced their writing.
I believe some writers were directly paid by intelligence agencies or think tanks to propagate untruths and steer public opinion.
The Anglo-American writer Christopher Hitchens said of Pilger: "I remember thinking that his work from Vietnam was very good at the time. I dare say if I went back and read it again I'd probably still admire quite a lot of it. But there is a word that gets overused and can be misused – namely, anti-American – and it has to be used about him. So that for me sort of spoils it... even when I'm inclined to agree."
The Economist's Lexington columnist commented on Pilger's account of the Arab uprising: Next up is the egregious John Pilger, who thinks the Arab revolts show that the West in general and the United States in particular are "fascist." ... Maybe he hasn't noticed, but what most of the Arab protesters say they want are the very freedoms that they know full well, even if Pilger doesn't, to be available in the West. No doubt he believes they are labouring under some massive mind-control delusion engineered by the CIA.
The New York magazine columnist Jonathan Chait responded to Pilger's 13 May 2014 column in The Guardian about Ukraine.[110] In the view of Chait, Pilger "defend[s] Vladimir Putin on the grounds that he stands opposed to the United States, which is the font of all evil" as a comical "attempt to cast land-grabbing, ultranationalist dictator Vladimir Putin as an enemy of fascism."[111] It has also been reported that Pilger's column contained a bogus quote from a non-existent Jewish Doctor which misleadingly gave the impression that the demonstrators expressed pro Nazi and antisemitic views while preventing the victims of the Odessa tragedy of 2 May from being rescued.
Despite the journalist’s long career of opposing tyranny, oppression, and dictatorship wherever he may find it, Pilger’s loathing of the United States has led him to produce a film that acts as an apology for Chinese totalitarianism, distorts the truth about Asian politics, and presents China as a passive victim in a potential new superpower war. Actually, my sympathy for his intellectual descent is less sincere than my anger; what I watched was an incendiary spectacle that manages to circle the triumvirate of narcissism, ignorance, and propaganda.
What about his report there? Have you no words for that?
And about that Arab Spring, have you not seen this:
originally posted by: neformore
and the rash of hate crimes against minorities since Trumps victory doesn't exactly sit well, does it?
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: network dude
Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Bush: Whatever you want.
Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
are you smart enough to comprehend that? good lord.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: network dude
Exact words?
"You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."
"Grab 'em by the p---y. You can do anything."
Context, it's an amazing thing when you are smart enough to comprehend it.
It is and because I don't want you to miss out on just how amazing it really is, I'm going to help you out!
"I just start kissing them"
"I don't even wait"
Both of of those are in the present progressive tense. The present progressive tense is used for things that are occurring in the present and are on-going. In other words, he hasn't waited, he doesn't wait and he's not planning on waiting in the future.
Why? Because "when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything." He's stating his opinion that women allow male celebrities to do whatever they want (to those women). Elaborating on what he means by do anything, Trump gives an example — "grab em by the p---y" — beforing reiterating his point that "you" (by which he means a "star" such as himself) can do anything (to a female stranger).
I believe it was three women who accused him of actually putting his hand on their crotches. Notice that I didn't say "grab" because I didn't want you to get hung up on the minutiae of what constitutes a "grab" versus other forms of uninvited gential touching. Did he do it? The only ones who really know are PE Trump and his accusers.
Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. I'm always glad to help!
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Shall I go on?
WOW! My mind has been blown. My entire thread put to shame. No more reason to go on with any of this. Why did I even take the time to begin with?