Julian Assange & Sean Hannity Embassy (Video) Interview 1/3/17

originally posted by: everyone

originally posted by: MrPlow
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Awl man...Assange denied their source of leaked Government information. It must be true! What a total nail in the coffin this is!



So....did Assange tell anyone WHO the source is then....? oh ok...I'll wait.

Post info that shows where wikileaks posted false information in the past.

Assange is purveyor of stolen government secrets, a cyber fence, and most probably guilty of extortion and blackmail too!

a reply to: windword

Post info that shows where wikileaks posted false information in the past.

a reply to: everyone

Yes that is what I got out of what Assange was informing us on. I would imagine he would know, being that he is a Computer Security Specialist... I do believe one of the main focuses of the interview was to point out the weaknesses of the security being utilized in the US currently. & that due to the extreme security weaknesses, it allowed the hack to happen in the first place.

Nope... I know nothing about hacking.

leolady

rare.us...

When WikiLeaks became a thing in 2010, leaking classified U.S. documents, conservatives wanted Julian Assange dead. Literally. Mike Huckabee said he should be executed. Others wanted to execute leaker Bradley Manning. Sarah Palin said that Assange was an “anti-American operative with blood on his hands.” Sean Hannity accused Assange of “waging war against the U.S.”

Now, Sean Hannity loves Julian Assange. “I do hope you get free one day and wish you the best,” Hannity told Assange during an interview on Fox News last month.

Assange has become popular on the right. Why? Because he’s going after Hillary Clinton. It’s not about Assange or WikiLeaks anymore—the focus is Clinton and how much conservatives loathe her. When your team does it, that means it’s not illegal.

a reply to: neformore

Someone posted this somewhere:



I noticed the zig zag as well. At one point Conservatives hated him while liberals held him as a hero. Now the table's turn and the conservatives love him while the liberals hate him.

What I see here is proof that Julian isn't really on anyone's side, but rather remains neutral. (I'd say he is on the side of Truth and truth ain't necessarily a person.)

No matter how people see it, the Truth will always hurt one side and this will cause them to demonize him as much as possible. Your post proves just that. One moment he is hated by one side. The next moment the side that hated him turns him into a hero.

But rest assured if Assange dropped Dirt on Trump; CNN will turn Assange once more into a hero. Because that is how they roll. As long as they complete their objective's. the ends justifies the means.

originally posted by: everyone
a reply to: windword

Post info that shows where wikileaks posted false information in the past.

Why? Did I challenge the authenticity of some Email?

originally posted by: leolady
a reply to: everyone

Yes that is what I got out of what Assange was informing us on. I would imagine he would know, being that he is a Computer Security Specialist... I do believe one of the main focuses of the interview was to point out the weaknesses of the security being utilized in the US currently. & that due to the extreme security weaknesses, it allowed the hack to happen in the first place.

Nope... I know nothing about hacking.

leolady

It's not really that the security is bad when it comes to congress ,the senate ,the white house admin. its actually very good but the weakest link wil remain to be ignorant end users. ped0sta used A Gmail account and a phone that where protected with "Passw0rd".

Hillary clinton completely bypassed any government security protocols in its entirety (which for her position is a criminal offense in and all by itself). and lets some bobo set up one for her so she could keep everyone in the dark about her actions.

There is no way of securing unwilling end users and they are almost always the point or cause of entry for any breach.

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: everyone
a reply to: windword

Post info that shows where wikileaks posted false information in the past.

Why? Did I challenge the authenticity of some Email?

It was the question you responded to.

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: neformore

Someone posted this somewhere:

I noticed the zig zag as well. At one point Conservatives hated him while liberals held him as a hero. Now the table's turn and the conservatives love him while the liberals hate him.

What I see here is proof that Julian isn't really on anyone's side, but rather remains neutral. (I'd say he is on the side of Truth and truth ain't necessarily a person.)

No matter how people see it, the Truth will always hurt one side and this will cause them to demonize him as much as possible. Your post proves just that. One moment he is hated by one side. The next moment the side that hated him turns him into a hero.

But rest assured if Assange dropped Dirt on Trump; CNN will turn Assange once more into a hero. Because that is how they roll. As long as they complete their objective's. the ends justifies the means.

Yeah i posted it, to show the hypocrisy of reldra's post and to show exactly what you just said about it. It's a brilliant pic that shows and tells a lot.

originally posted by: everyone

originally posted by: MrPlow
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Awl man...Assange denied their source of leaked Government information. It must be true! What a total nail in the coffin this is!



So....did Assange tell anyone WHO the source is then....? oh ok...I'll wait.

Post info that shows where wikileaks posted false information in the past.

What a weird leap in logic...
So because Wikileaks never released anything that wasn't true, that means Assange himself is not lying when he says Russia isn't his source.

It seems the cynical are always the most easily duped....but only when it confirms your own current bias, huh

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Leak it all now and let the chips fall where they may.. that's what I say. Let justice prevail or the heavens fall (or however that saying goes).

Now's the time.

Otherwise Assange will appear to be playing the Trump administration.

The main problem with giving us more information is that we've stalled in how to digest the information we have thus far...

There seem to be laws in place to lead a prosecutor to seek justice in this matter...
We have the structure in place for the prosecutor to do his job...

We have yet afforded the investigator, but he's busy trying to make his job look legitimate...?

If I needed a security adviser, I'd expect him to tell me to keep my hands off other people's property?
I have a military force if someone is trying to steal my property; though in a case need be?

Take the salaries and perks and return them to the purse...we are evolving from meddling...
Isn't it time to begin the healing process?

a reply to: everyone

Like I said, I've never challenged the authenticity of the (stolen) data. Just because Assange publishes the data that he has purchased accurately, that doesn't make him an honest or a trustworthy man.

originally posted by: loveguy
a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Leak it all now and let the chips fall where they may.. that's what I say. Let justice prevail or the heavens fall (or however that saying goes).

Now's the time.

Otherwise Assange will appear to be playing the Trump administration.

The main problem with giving us more information is that we've stalled in how to digest the information we have thus far...

There seem to be laws in place to lead a prosecutor to seek justice in this matter...
We have the structure in place for the prosecutor to do his job...

We have yet afforded the investigator, but he's busy trying to make his job look legitimate...?

If I needed a security adviser, I'd expect him to tell me to keep my hands off other people's property?
I have a military force if someone is trying to steal my property; though in a case need be?

Take the salaries and perks and return them to the purse...we are evolving from meddling...
Isn't it time to begin the healing process?

No, to heal you have to get to the heart of the wound itself, where if there's Justice, then the winds of Liberty blow authentically into the American flag again.

It's tough stuff. The is a war that's being waged behind the scenes right now make no mistake.

The Satanists and the Neocons are OUT!

But to take down that whole structure of corruption, even if it looks good like a whitewashed sepulcher, you have to open it up.

There is no more absolute assurance of secrecy any more.

The corruption must all come out, and the networks of wicked forms of "power" dismantled.

That whole mountain has to be removed and thrown into the abyss, and that could be painful for many, but it's time for it all to come out, and for would be leakers to leak, and WikiLeaks to go ahead and publish it all without withholding anything back.

The time is now.

a reply to: windword

Then don't respond to my request for proof that he ever released false information.

Next to that as someone who created and runs the most trusted source in the world that has never been show to be partisan or dishonest i think it is rationale enough for sane people to trust him.

Sure can't say that about Mr. fast and the furious barrak hussein or benhgazi "what at this point does it matter" hillary.
You are reaching, deep.

a reply to: everyone

Julian Assange is nothing more than a cyber fence, dealing in stolen government secrets, besides being wanted for some kind of sexual perversion. For all I know he engages in blackmail and extortion as well.

Is neither trustworthy or honest and I will take the word of the people sworn to serve and protect the interests of America and the safety of the American people I'll trust someone who outwardly loathes the US and its leadership.

a reply to: windword

Do you have any clue how desperate you make yourself look?

a reply to: everyone

It's called patriotism, and I understand what a foreign concept that is to you. I support "the troops" whether they're boot on the ground in Afghanistan or leather soles on carpets in an office in the Pentagon/CIA/NSA/ETC.