It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.nydailynews.com...
Three Michigan police officers, who shot two dogs for lunging and barking at them during a drug raid, were once again justified in their actions — this time by a federal appeals court.
Mark and Cheryl Brown of Battle Creek, Mich., filed suits over unreasonable seizure of their property and a violation of their constitutional rights for the deaths of their pets.
The standard we set out today is that a police officer’s use of deadly force against a dog while executing a search warrant to search a home for illegal drug activity is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment when … the dog poses an imminent threat to the officer’s safety,” wrote Judge Eric Clay in the decision that saw the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati side with the U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids' dismissal.
"It was a good ruling," Police Chief Jim Blocker told the Battle Creek Enquirer. "It pointed out some things we have to improve upon, but supported our operating concept that officers must act within reason."
who shot two dogs for lunging and barking at them
originally posted by: imwilliam
who shot two dogs for lunging and barking at them
Were the dogs tied or on a leash? You don't want to be the cop that shoots my dogs if they're on a leash or tied or in their own back yard. Actually, you just don't want to be the cop that shoots my dogs period.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Urantia1111
Hold up, the story says if the dog barks, they can shoot them. How does barking interrupt a no know predawn raid?
And dogs are territorial pack animals. Anyone who has a dog can attest that if someone comes crashing trough the door, the dog is going to react.
Should we have mandatory tie up and muzzle your dog in the house laws?