It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
Have you seen this?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by bodrul
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
Have you seen this?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
cant find anything to do wiuth saudi owning 7% of the US
If any single "investor" becomes and Issue the "Gov" can "nationalize" the property. It is truely and investment nothinh else. FDR did it, Bush already has done it under the pat act.
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
You missed the point. The UN also has assets in the US, and they are big ones.
Originally posted by marg6043
Well taking in consideration that investing in American through purchasing and then finacing terrorist through donations, to then profit from the war on Terror through groups like Carlyle firm and the defensed budget is considered by the Saud family a way to make a buck.
Originally posted by bodrul
Originally posted by marg6043
Well taking in consideration that investing in American through purchasing and then finacing terrorist through donations, to then profit from the war on Terror through groups like Carlyle firm and the defensed budget is considered by the Saud family a way to make a buck.
the binladin family had a high stake in carlyle
but later withdrew after things were getting a bit to hot
Originally posted by astral_ice
Yes we can nationalize assets in some circumstances. It's why I don't worry too much about countries pulling in our national debt. If worst came to worst and the EU called in every debt we have with them we could declare china an enemy and rob peter to pay paul.l