Washington Post launches Chrome plug-in to fact-check Trump on Twitter

a reply to: Byrd

Exactly. There is nothing about it that makes it one sided only.

I think anyone in an official role should be auto fact checked to keep them honest.

a reply to: mOjOm

He did win by a landslide. It wasn't even close.

a reply to: Byrd

So when is the Chrome Plug In for Fact Checking the Washington Post coming out ? People Wanna Know .......

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: mOjOm

He did win by a landslide. It wasn't even close.

He only got just over 56% of the electoral votes though. Just over half isn't a landslide. Since you need at least half just to win it's actually just making it.

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Is this part of the the 600 million dollar contract the CIA has with the Washington Post

Who needs facts?

Facts mean nothing to his supporters.

They just need the fake news censor app to block out the WaPo website and it's job will be done.

a reply to: khnum

Is there supposed to be one?

What's wrong with having different sources available for what Trump says? Is it better to make a decision about something with less information?

Do you support the censoring of media you don't agree with?

If Trump isn't talking about things that are verifiably factual as president, he probably shouldn't be talking.

They're leading the charge to censor non-Official Version websites. They're a pure propaganda outlet which means they're no different, as them and the fedgov have declared propaganda to be fake news that needs to be censored.

a reply to: Byrd

That would be one of the last place I would go for information,they have made Alex Jones out to be a saviour,from what I've seen they print a lot of ink,but not much in fact