It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Forensick
these are new magic PV cells - magic light deserves magic PV cells
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
This is how I know you guys never bother to actually look into anything before making your prognostications of fraud.
I watched both videos. Assume the "Hydrino" is real then both speakers give you the impression they are bringing a product to market.
The problem with the "Hydrino" is it changes the standard model of physics. I'm just a little skeptical this is real. You would think something this fundamental to physics would be discovered many times over. I've been listening to Mills claims for over 10 years now. What's another year of waiting for something real?
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
I'm assuming they will have a first generation prototype generator ready to demo sometime in February.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist
yes - i actually do - and you know EXACTLY what i am asking for - evasive dishonesty noted
I truly don't know what the hell you are asking for.
I literally provided lectures directly from the engineers of two separate firms that are working on BrLP's product launch. I don't know how I can get any more "primary" than that.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
This is how I know you guys never bother to actually look into anything before making your prognostications of fraud.
I watched both videos. Assume the "Hydrino" is real then both speakers give you the impression they are bringing a product to market.
The problem with the "Hydrino" is it changes the standard model of physics. I'm just a little skeptical this is real. You would think something this fundamental to physics would be discovered many times over. I've been listening to Mills claims for over 10 years now. What's another year of waiting for something real?
The OP was just an update on their progress.
I'm not sure what you consider "real" though. They have a functional reactor. All they have left to do is strap a PV dome on it and wire it all up into a closed system. As I said in the OP, if all goes smoothly, they should take delivery of the PV dome in January. I'm assuming they will have a first generation prototype generator ready to demo sometime in February.
What you believe about physics seems to be irrelevant. In fact, that's the problem with theoretical physics today. It's a belief system, rather than science.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: dfnj2015
Yeah I get that.
All that means is QM is a failed theory given that it cannot explain the reactions Mills is achieving.
That's the way science works. Theory does not dictate experimental results. Experiment dictates theory.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
This is how I know you guys never bother to actually look into anything before making your prognostications of fraud.
I watched both videos. Assume the "Hydrino" is real then both speakers give you the impression they are bringing a product to market.
The problem with the "Hydrino" is it changes the standard model of physics. I'm just a little skeptical this is real. You would think something this fundamental to physics would be discovered many times over. I've been listening to Mills claims for over 10 years now. What's another year of waiting for something real?
The OP was just an update on their progress.
I'm not sure what you consider "real" though. They have a functional reactor. All they have left to do is strap a PV dome on it and wire it all up into a closed system. As I said in the OP, if all goes smoothly, they should take delivery of the PV dome in January. I'm assuming they will have a first generation prototype generator ready to demo sometime in February.
What you believe about physics seems to be irrelevant. In fact, that's the problem with theoretical physics today. It's a belief system, rather than science.
I'm trying to be open minded. The Hydrino implies a new lower ground state of matter. The mathematics may make it look like it is real. However, as I said, if this claim were real it would have been discovered thousands of times over. Mills is very smart but he's not the only one with brains and skills in physics. Again, I want to be open minded. But I've been watching Mills for what seems like forever. The last round of demos really turned me off. Let's hope in February he shows us his electric bill in New Jersey is paying him a dividend and not a cost.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
Mills only discovered this catalytic excitation by completely abandoning QM.
His discovery is the result of first coming up with his own theory about how the electron works.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Bedlam
if we is making predictions for next year - how long till CT and misamo disappear - never to be heard from again ?
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: dfnj2015
Yeah I get that.
All that means is QM is a failed theory given that it cannot explain the reactions Mills is achieving.
That's the way science works. Theory does not dictate experimental results. Experiment dictates theory.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: dfnj2015
Yeah I get that.
All that means is QM is a failed theory given that it cannot explain the reactions Mills is achieving.
That's the way science works. Theory does not dictate experimental results. Experiment dictates theory.